The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Eight minutes and 46 seconds

Theses on the Police and White Supremacist Killings of African Americans in the USA


10/06/2020


The working class of US-America face a triple crisis at this moment. The first is the murderous violence by the police that continues against African American people. The second is the on-going uncontained COVID-19 epidemic, which affects the same vulnerable members hardest. Finally is the on-going economic crisis where the economy of the USA has faltered at least since the 2008 financial crisis. It is difficult to disentangle each strand.

This article focusses on the most immediate crisis – the intense and life-threatening crisis for African Americans. The long aftermath of slavery is a legacy still not fully acknowledged by the predominantly white ruling class of the USA.

1. What happened?

On May 25, 2020 Mr. George Floyd – an African American man – became the latest victim of racist murder by racists in police uniform. [1] This time the deed was done in Minneapolis, where four police officers arrested Mr. Floyd. Three of them calmly watched as their fellow-officer, Derek Chauvin murdered Floyd:

“George Floyd, a 46-year-old black man, after a deli employee called 911, accusing him of buying cigarettes with a counterfeit $20 bill. Seventeen minutes after the first squad car arrived at the scene, Mr. Floyd was unconscious and pinned beneath three police officers, showing no signs of life…

Derek Chauvin, the officer who can be seen most clearly in witness videos pinning Mr. Floyd to the ground. Mr. Chauvin, who is white, kept his knee on Mr. Floyd’s neck for eight minutes and 46 seconds…

Our video shows that Mr. Chauvin did not remove his knee even after Mr. Floyd lost consciousness, and for a full minute after paramedics arrived at the scene. The three other former officers, Thomas Lane, J. Alexander Kueng and Tou Thao — all of whom can be seen.. participating in Mr. Floyd’s arrest.” [1]

On a later bystander’s video, which went viral, numerous citizens are heard begging Chauvin to let Mr. Floyd go. Even more heart-rending, early on in the long 8 minutes 46 seconds – Mr. Floyd himself is heard desperately saying “I can’t breathe”. For about 2 minutes before Chauvin lifted his keen from Floyd’s neck, he had been motionless. Mr, Floyd’s death was followed at bewildering speed by an intense chain reaction.

Yet Chauvin was well known to the police department and the City as a violent man:

“Excessive force complaints against Minneapolis officers have become commonplace, especially by African-American residents. One of the officers involved in Mr. Floyd’s death, a 19-year veteran of the department identified as Derek Chauvin, 44, had several complaints filed against him, three of which led to reprimands for his language and tone.

Mr. Chauvin shot a man who was trying to grab an officer’s gun in 2008, according to The Pioneer Press. He was also present at two other shootings, one of them fatal, but it was unclear if he fired his weapon in those cases, according to Communities United Against Police Brutality, a local organization advocating police reform.” [2]

The initial city response to Floyd’s was obfuscatory to say the least. All four officers were fired, but not arrested:

“In a statement following the Monday night incident, the Minneapolis Police Department said they were responding to “a report of a forgery in progress” and claimed Floyd’s death was caused by an unspecified “medical incident.” Shortly after video of the incident emerged and spread rapidly across social media, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey announced the firing of four officers who were on the scene.” [3]

Democratic party notables including Senior Senator Amy Klobuchar for Minnesota, mildly called merely for an “investigation”. Only after considerable public agitation, and the Floyd family insistence on arrests, – was Chauvin finally arrested. Even then he was charged with 3rd degree murder and not 1st degree murder.

At time of writing (June 3rd), the other three co-murderers were finally to be charged – again finally the Minnesota state bowing to mass pressure.

2. The Immediate backdrop

The searing history of US-American capitalism’s use, exploitation and repression of Black American people, cannot be adequately summarized here. It is frankly impossible to recite all victims by name, certainly we will never know the true number, as so many were unrecorded. But here we indicate some relevant immediate issues.

i) Nation-wide injustice not legally remediable through the secretive ‘Grand Jury’

The systematic legalized lynching of black men in particular – although black women like Breona Taylor [4] and others [5] are also victims – has repeatedly sparked anger. With Floyd’s murder, a huge wave of demonstrations and protests was ignited. This has precipitated a further unmasking of the USA state hypocrisy on race. President Trump has also deliberately fanned racist hatred, for example by quoting an infamously bigoted Southern police chief.

The similarity of events to the New York police murder of Eric Garner is astounding – down to the cry “I can’t breathe”. No officer in the 2014 New York case has even to today, been convicted of murder. [6] In Mr. Garner’s case, a secret ‘Grand Jury’ refused to even indict the responsible police officer. [7] In fact the whole Grand Jury process depends upon how aggressively the State or city prosecutors argue for a case to be criminal:

“Grand juries determine whether enough evidence exists for a case to go forward to a criminal trial, either before a jury or a judge. By law, they operate in secret and hear only evidence presented by prosecutors, who also instruct the grand jurors on the law. Defense lawyers are barred from speaking. For a decision, 12 jurors who have heard all of the evidence must agree.” [7]

The American Bar Association 5 , and many progressive organisations 6 have long called for reforms, for example saying at a Subcommittee hearing in 2000:

“On behalf of the American Bar Association…

The grand jury is a unique body in our legal system. It possesses awesome powers: The grand jury’s work is conducted in secret… Courts do not generally supervise its work closely….
But the grand jury has also come under increasing criticism for being a mere ”rubber stamp” for the prosecution without adequate procedural safeguards. Critics argue that the grand jury has largely lost its historic role as an independent bulwark protecting citizens from unfounded accusations by the government.” [8,9]

We noted Amy Klobachar above. As a Hennepin County Prosecutor – she refused to file charges against police officers, preferring to use the secretive Grand Jury approach:

“Over eight years beginning in 1999, the city of Minneapolis paid $4.8 million in legal settlements related to 122 police misconduct incidents. And police officers and county sheriffs were involved in 29 civilian deaths. Klobuchar, however, chose not to criminally charge any fatalities involving law enforcement. Instead she routinely put the decision to a grand jury, a process widely criticized for its secrecy and for mostly allowing the police version of events. Klobuchar also didn’t take on any of the misconduct claims. The mother of a black teenager who was shot and killed by police in 2004 begged Klobuchar to file charges against the officer instead of presenting the case to a grand jury.

“The grand jury is a way of hiding that the prosecutor is not giving the full information of guilt to the grand jury,” Tahisha Williams Brewer wrote to Klobuchar at the time. “I want this process out in the open, where everyone can observe it and make sure that it is fair to my son.”

Klobuchar did not directly respond to Williams Brewer and proceeded to present the case to a grand jury, which found the shooting was justified.” [10]

Plainly the legal system is stacked against blacks and African-American victims, and the working class. Long ago, in ‘The German Ideology’ Marx and Engels warned that the law is only the expression of the will of the ruling class, it becomes the law of state; and it then becomes simply a reflection of the ruling class’s economic and social relations:

“The individuals who rule in these conditions – leaving aside the fact that their power must assume the form of the state – have to give their will, which is determined by these definite conditions, a universal expression as the will of the state, as law, an expression whose content is always determined by the relations of this class, as the civil and criminal law demonstrates in the clearest possible way.” [11]

ii) African-American Response to Institutional Injustice

Minneapolis itself has a long history of police violence against African Americans:

“The city has been rocked by officer-involved shootings in recent years and subsequent protest. In 2015 two Minneapolis police officers faced no repercussions for shooting and killing Jamar Clark a twenty-four-year-old black man. In 2016 police killed Philandro Castile, thirty-two-year-old black man, in nearby Falcon Heights, an encounter that was captured on social media and received national attention. A jury ultimately acquitted the officer who took Castile’s life.” [12]

But this is beyond Minneapolis, it is a pan-USA struggle, one pitting the black working class against the police. African-Americans have not been silent over the USA in the last 50 years. As Hinton points out, blacks populations have adopted a repetitive resistance, nearly always precipitated by police violence:

“These types of uprisings have been a nearly perennial occurrence in the United States for more than fifty years. In the month following the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., black uprisings erupted in more than 125 cities, leading to 50 deaths and more than 15,000 arrests. In the years that followed (1968–72), at least 960 segregated black communities witnessed 2,310 separate incidents of what journalists and state security officials described as “disturbances,” “uprisings,” “rebellions,” “melees,” “eruptions,” or “riots.”

As in Minneapolis today, this type of collective violence almost always started with contact between residents and the frontline representatives of the state—the police—and then quickly moved to other institutions.”[11]

The US-American ruling class recognise accurately enough the potential menace to them. But their solution has been to increase policing. More – they have militarised the police with intimidating equipment and ‘riot control training’. As Hinton correctly points out, this misses the fact that at least a portion of the response of the street is mis-characterised as ‘criminal’ – rather than the ‘political violence’ it is:

“In fact, U.S. cities had been beset with black rebellion since the enactment of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal policymakers and officials blamed this earlier period of disorders (and the hundreds of millions of dollars in property damage it caused) primarily on the behavior of young black men.

They sought to address it as a criminal problem, launching the War on Crime and passing the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, which incentivized increased local policing and surveillance of black urban areas, as well as formal “riot control” training.

However, a proper understanding of sixties-era urban rebellion—and similar rebellions now—depends on our ability to interpret it not as a wave of criminality, but as a period of sustained political violence.” [2]

3. Disproportionate effects of the COVID 19 pandemic upon Black workers

We will not dwell here, on the on-going decimation of the COVID 19 virus upon the most vulnerable black sections of the US-American working class. It is enough to make three points. First that there has been an ‘excess’ burden – meaning higher death rates and rates of infection – in the African American population than other sections of the US-American population. [13, 14]

“In Illinois, 43 percent of people who have died from the disease and 28 percent of those who have tested positive are African-Americans, a group that makes up just 15 percent of the state’s population. African-Americans, who account for a third of positive tests in Michigan, represent 40 percent of deaths in that state even though they make up 14 percent of the population. In Louisiana, about 70 percent of the people who have died are black, though only a third of that state’s population is.

Initial indications are that doctors are less likely to refer African-Americans for testing when they visit a clinic with symptoms of Covid-19, the disease caused by the virus. Since the disease can progress quickly, researchers say, a disparity in testing can lead to considerably worse outcomes.” [15]

Second this has a relationship to the overall higher rates of poverty and ill-health in this most vulnerable section of the class. [16]

Finally, the notorious lack of adequate health care coverage was designed to maximize the disastrous effects of COVID. As long time reformers – Woolhandler and Himmelstein comment, a change is possibly coming, precipitated by the post COVID crisis:

“Although the COVID-19 crisis demands urgent action, it also exposes the imprudence of tying health insurance to employment, and the need for more thoroughgoing reform. A trickle of families facing the dual disaster of job loss and health insurance loss can remain under Washington’s radar.

However, the current tsunami of job and coverage losses along with a heightened risk for severe illness demands action. A decade ago, Victor Fuchs forecasted that “National health insurance will probably come to the United States after a major change in the political climate—the kind of change that often accompanies a war, a depression, or large-scale civil unrest.” Such a major change may be upon us.” [17]

Meanwhile, the Coronavirus rages on. Now with more than 100,000 US-Americans dead, and more than 40 million unemployed officially. [18]

4. The Economic Crisis facing the divided USA Ruling Class

This has been dealt with in several analyses including our own. [19] One that especially takes into account the COVID-19 health crisis is that of Michael Roberts. [20] We cannot reiterate the many, basically concurring analyses in depth here. However perhaps it is worth restating what does not get adequate attention, that there is a battle for supremacy inside the USA ruling class.

What is this all about? After all, the intense warfare between the Republican and Democratic party wings of the capitalist class is pretty unusual. This is a war taking place between those representatives of finance capital primarily, and representatives of old industrial type capital (automobile, oil, gas etc).

This has a corresponding political war between the main parties. We identified Trump as a representative of the old industrial capitalists.19 We believed he would try to ‘re-shore’ industrial capital, and prepare a trade war against both the European Union and the Chinese state.

The effort to bring manufacturing industry back to the USA – so-called ‘re-shoring’ – has been not been hugely successful to date. [21] But a renewed attempt has been launched by Trump, invoking the critical shortage of medical protective equipment.

5. The People’s Reaction To Floyd’s Murder – Black and White and Brown

Demonstrations began the day after the murder, on Tuesday May 26th. The outpouring of people on the streets of US-America’s cities, was and remains – a deep roar of rage and anguish. This was a largely spontaneously roar. It found expression in chants of ‘I Can’t Breathe”, and the older chant of “Black Lives Matter”.

Most recently, a speech by Tamika Mallory expressed vividly the “state of the emergency for black People. Black people are dying”. Mallory was a previous co-organizer of the 2017 Women’s March, and a ‘Black Lives matters’ advocate. Her views on the widely viewed video referenced here have resonated deeply – and clearly represent those of the African American people [22]

It is crucial to understand, that while this rage was primarily voiced by African-Americans it was loudly echoed by non-blacks – including many who are white. Many immigrant organisations have signed solidarity statements. [23] Such solidarity is an expression of recognizing today, the validity of Marx’s dictum:

“In the USA, every independent workers movement was paralysed as long as slavery disfigured a part of the republic. Labour in a white skin cannot emancipate itself where it is branded in a black skin.”[24]

Almost all of the marches and demonstrations had one immediate central demand – arrest the 3 other police officers – who had simply and calmly watched as Chauvin murdered Mr. Floyd. The cry was ‘One down, three to go!” On June 3rd they won that demand. But of course they were also saying at a more fundamental level, no more state-sanctioned police killings of African-American people.

6. Working class core content

In the standard press, the role of class is relatively minimized. Only latterly as the eruption of black anger rises has it been acknowledged. But because the black population are the most disadvantaged people in the USA, there is an overlap with class and poverty. Even the most ‘standard of USA media’ are now forced to recognize this. For example, just today, there are some compelling graphics carried by CNN. [25] We show one of these below.

Of course, ‘wealth’ as described by the CNN is not fully equivalent to a Marxist definition of class. But it bears enough validity for our purposes here. It cannot be forgotten that the fundamental division in USA society is that of class.

That is why there has been such a resonance to the manifest injustice here:

“Scrawled across several buildings, alongside “Black Lives Matter,” was another slogan: “Eat the Rich.”…

“The anger being felt is not just the deep injustice of police brutality,” said Saru Jayaraman, who has for years organized for fair wages for tipped workers. Those workers, she said, are now being told that their wages aren’t high enough to qualify for state unemployment insurance — at a time when large corporations are getting millions in aid. Anger boiling over now, she said, is also about “the injustice of the corporate control of our democracy and the 1 percent really benefiting off the fruits of their labor.” [26]

7. Smearing the demonstrators.

The protestors are mis-characterised in a section of the press, and certainly by the Republican party, as mainly violent looters. But the vast majority of the protesters and demonstrators are undoubtedly peaceful in their intention.

The slanders against the vast majority by most of the media should be viewed with skepticism.The issue of violence was repeatedly used by the USA State to smear the demonstrators as a whole. But at heart is the absence of justice, resulting in an intense frustration.

Mallory was very eloquent on this. While it is better to actually hear her say this out loud (see the video 19 ) as she says it – her isolated stark words are searing enough:

“We cannot look at this as an isolated incident. The reason why buildings are burning, is not just for our brother George Floyd. They are burning down because people here in Minnesota are saying to people in New York, to people in California, people in Memphis, to people all across this nation that “Enough is enough!”

We are not responsible for the mental illness that has been inflicted upon our people time and time by the American government, by the institutions and those people who are in positions of power. I don’t give a damn if they burn down ‘Target’. Because ‘Target’ should be on the streets with us, calling for the justice that our people deserve… Young people are frustrated and instigated by the people you pay., You are paying instigators to be among our people out there. To be throwing rocks, and breaking windows, and burning down buildings.

And so young people are responding to that. They are enraged. And so there is an easy way to stop it. Arrest the cops. Charge the cops! Charge all the cops. Not just some of them. … Do your job. .. DO what you say what this country is supposed to be about the land of the free for all. It has not been free for Black people, and we are tired. Charge the cops – all of them. Charge the cops in every city…” [19]

In case anyone is mystified about why the supermarket chain ‘Target’ is singled out:

“The company has long been associated with police surveillance and Minnesota Police Department’s treatment of black and low-income residents of the city…

In 2004, the company made a $300,000 donation to the city to install CCTV throughout the downtown area. Target also established the “SafeZone” program that same year to help the police department with surveillance logistics. Target has a number of similar law enforcement programs in more than 20 cities in the U.S., though its first police partnership was in Minneapolis, where the retailer’s headquarters are located. [27]

8. Deliberate inflammation and infiltration

We repeat, the vast majority of protesters were and are peaceful. But the actions of agent-provocateurs should not be minimized. There is concrete evidence for this.

Even the Minnesota Attorney General has questioned the activity of suspected agent-provocateurs. [28] In another example, the video referenced here, shows “A group of young white men beat a non-white protester in Minneapolis as protests raged across the city, disturbing video obtained by VICE News shows.”  [29] Such incidents are bad enough.

There is now also well documented evidence of an active infiltration by members of the extreme right. A more systematic background of the infiltrators into the fully legitimate reaction is seen in an investigative report by ‘Bellingcat’. [30]

Now admittedly the crazed politics of the far Right are difficult to get a grasp upon. And it seems at first, counter-intuitive that these movements, which are racist at core, would glorify a dead African-American. But in their vehement attacks on ‘big government’ – even a dead African-American is hailed as a fellow-victim. If this seems doubtful, consider this:

“On the Facebook page, Big Igloo Bois, which at the time of writing had 30,637 followers, an administrator wrote of the protests, “If there was ever a time for bois to stand in solidarity with ALL free men and women in this country, it is now”.
They added, “This is not a race issue. For far too long we have allowed them to murder us in our homes, and in the streets. We need to stand with the people of Minneapolis. We need to support them in this protest against a system that allows police brutality to go unchecked.”

The accompanying commentary from ‘Bellingcat’ – says:

“In a United States made even more unstable by a contentious presidential elections season, and the social and epidemiological effects of COVID-19, every protest or street battle and its aftermath will carry the potential for serious acts of violence. As protests over the death of George Floyd heated up in Minneapolis on May 26th, members of so-called ‘Boogaloo’ groups across Facebook considered it a call to arms. Memes were churned up that day, adding George to the movement’s list of martyrs.”

Nonetheless, the mass of the demonstrators have themselves – policed and resisted – against provocateurs and looters. There are countless reported incidents of this. This makes absolute sense. A veteran of demonstrations in Egypt during the heady days of the Arab Spring, had this as advice to offer to the Floyd marchers:

“The easiest and most futile-feeling, time-consuming, and infuriating to deal with are the troublemakers. They will exist in every protest, even the most well-organized one, because opportunists are fostered by capitalism and indoctrinated from birth to seek their own benefit.” [31]

Of course the biggest ‘trouble-maker’ is the President of the USA – who actively seeks to incite mayhem. His now notorious tweet: “When the looting starts, the shooting starts,” was widely interpreted as an incitement to violence. The phrase originates from a racist Southern policeman in the 1960s during the Civil Rights marches. [32]

9. The Militarized Response – Tear gas, Mounted Police National Guard and army mobilization – The Armed State

If ever there remained illusions of how democratic the USA was, especially under Trump – the sight of the armed might of the state might dissolve them. Frederick Engels described the state as “a public force of armed men, but also of material appendages, prisons and coercive institutions of all kinds” [33]

Trump is showing that to be true. He has already deployed some 20,000 National Guardsmen in at least 29 states. Although some state governors (including Minnesota’s Tim Walz) have declined the offer of military police. Trump is threatening to over-rule them and send in troops, using an Act dating from 1878:

“Trump has the authority, however, to deploy the military to states under the Insurrection Act, which would represent a dramatic escalation of Trump’s executive authority and likely spark pushback from state and local officials.

While the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 prohibits the domestic use of military for law enforcement purposes without specific congressional authorization, the Insurrection Act gives the president authorization to do so under certain circumstances, according to legal experts.

The Insurrection Act has been invoked dozens of times in the country’s history, most recently during the 1992 uprising over the Los Angeles police officers’ beating of Rodney King.” [34]

Rodney King – is another instance of police brutality – that younger militants may not know:

“March 3, 1991 — Rodney King is pulled over by California Highway Patrol officers for speeding on a Los Angeles freeway. King, who later admitted he tried to elude authorities because he had been drinking and was on probation for a robbery conviction, pulled off the freeway and eventually stopped his car in front of a San Fernando Valley apartment building.

At that point, Los Angeles police officers took charge of the traffic stop. George Holliday… videotaped the scene, filming four white officers beating and kicking the black motorist dozens of times, including after he was on the ground…Holliday turns over the video to a local TV station.” [35]

Despite a graphic and horrifying video made public, the four officers beating King were acquitted by a jury. This sparked huge protests in which Los Angeles saw the deaths of 63, and 2,383 injuries. The Army National Guard, and the US Army, and the US Marine Corps were deployed by Republican President George H.W. Bush the First.

Already more than just the National Guard have been deployed. To seize a photo-opportunity and ‘his domination of the streets’ – Trump and his lackey Attorney General William Barr concocted a plan. They ordered a violent dispersion of protesters opposite the White House by many varieties of federal controlled troops:

“After a weekend of protests that led all the way to his own front yard and forced him to briefly retreat to a bunker beneath the White House, President Trump arrived in the Oval Office on Monday agitated over the television images, annoyed that anyone would think he was hiding and eager for action.

He wanted to send the military into American cities, an idea that provoked a heated, voices-raised fight among his advisers. But by the end of the day, urged on by his daughter Ivanka Trump, he came up with a more personal way of demonstrating toughness — he would march across Lafayette Square to a church damaged by fire the night before….

In Washington, Mr. Barr was in charge of the federal response and an alphabet soup of agencies had contributed officers, agents and troops to defend the White House and other federal installations, including the Secret Service, the United States Park Police, National Guard, Capitol Police, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the Marshal’s Service, the Bureau of Prisons, Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement.” [36]

Alongside hitting out at peaceful and law-abiding protesters and demonstrators, an un-restrained attack has been launched on journalists covering the protests. [37] Ultimately both national guardsmen and army are composed of alienated working class people. Some of these know their true allegiance and are refusing to deploy:

“Veterans and GI rights organizations told Truthout that dozens of GIs are reaching out to assess their options… Some National Guard and active-duty GIs are refusing to deploy to U.S. cities rising up against police-perpetrated killings, saying no to complicity in the repression of the American populace and that they have not been properly trained in riot response or de-escalation tactics on domestic soil.” [30]

10. Reformist solutions have not worked so far – What is left?

Reformism – whether of the Republican or Democratic strands (including Obama) –ignores the root problem, and either criminalises it or offers mere pablum responses:

“Policymakers and officials, from Richard Nixon’s War on Crime to the bipartisan War on Drugs to Donald Trump’s embrace of “Law and Order” politics, have consistently sought to manage the material consequences of socioeconomic problems (e.g., urban decay and drug abuse) with more police, more surveillance, and, eventually, more incarceration.

We as a nation still fail to reckon with the wisdom King prophetically offered toward the end of his life: that only “social justice and progress are the absolute guarantors of riot prevention. There is no other answer. Constructive social change will bring certain tranquility; evasions will merely encourage turmoil.” [38]

Regrettably, the voice of Dr. Martin Luther King was not heard. After all – capitalism will not hear such words, as – it just would not be capitalism otherwise….

Indeed the more far-sighted capitalists (including Jamie Dimon chief executive of notorious J.P.Morgan firm of financial wheeler-dealers [39]) recognize there must be changes if the system is to survive. But again: “capitalism would not be….. etc”!

Lenin said that we could recognize a revolutionary situation by three criteria:

“What, generally speaking, are the symptoms of a revolutionary situation? We shall certainly not be mistaken if we indicate the following three major symptoms:

(1) when it is impossible for the ruling classes to maintain their rule without any change; when there is a crisis, in one form or another, among the “upper classes”, a crisis in the policy of the ruling class, leading to a fissure through which the discontent and indignation of the oppressed classes burst forth. For a revolution to take place, it is usually insufficient for “the lower classes not to want” to live in the old way; it is also necessary that “the upper classes should be unable” to live in the old way;

(2) when the suffering and want of the oppressed classes have grown more acute than usual;

(3) when, as a consequence of the above causes, there is a considerable increase in the activity of the masses, who uncomplainingly allow themselves to be robbed in “peace time”, but, in turbulent times, are drawn both by all the circumstances of the crisis and by the “upper classes” themselves into independent historical action.” [40]

We are fulfilling much of this check-list now. The bourgeois regime is in crisis and whatever reforms are made, it cannot extricate itself from it. While Trump huffs and puffs about further trade wars, thus far he has not succeeded to improve the capitalist economy:

“Nothing has reversed the decline of the county’s manufacturing base. From January 2017 to December 2018, it lost nearly 9 percent of its manufacturing jobs, and 17 other counties in Michigan that Mr. Trump carried have experienced similar losses,” [41]

The crisis of the COVID-19 shortage of Personal Protective Equipment, was the dramatic back-drop of a further push by Trump on this matter:

“President Trump rattled Wall Street when he demanded U.S. firms move production out of China. But many have already taken steps to do so, and, in earnings calls just over the past month, dozens of executives have signaled plans to further diversify their supply chains amid the intensifying trade war.

On Aug. 23, Trump took to Twitter, ordering American companies to “immediately start looking for an alternative to China” and build more products in the U.S. In doing so, he cited the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) — passed in 1977 to deal with an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.” The president’s threat unsettled investors, sending stocks to session lows on a day when the Dow Jones Industrial Average shed more than 600 points.” [42]

“The Trump administration is “turbocharging” an initiative to remove global industrial supply chains from China… The US Commerce Department, State and other agencies are looking for ways to push companies to move both sourcing and manufacturing out of China.

Tax incentives and potential re-shoring subsidies are among measures being considered to spur changes, the current and former officials told Reuters…. “There is a whole of government push on this,” said one. Agencies are probing which manufacturing should be deemed “essential” and how to produce these goods outside of China.” [43]

At bottom the capitalist solutions to the combined three-fold crisis will be only temporary solutions.

Conclusions:

Capitalism in the USA is confronted not only by its own internal problems that it cannot solve. It is also confronted by at least two major rival imperialists powers. One is that of China – its main threat. But the European Union, if it can sort out its own internal problem, is another. There is little doubt that Trump is itching to install a military style clamp down. The indications are that the crisis persuades sections of the US capitalist class to support him.

The problem facing the working class and its supporters is that there is no viable organised Marxist party to fight for a socialist path. Decidedly Biden and the Democratic Party is not that. While they are obviously preferable to the Trump option, it is far short of what is needed. What is needed is a determined party both in theory and practice.

 

Footnotes

1 8 Minutes and 46 Seconds: How George Floyd Was Killed in Police CustodyBy Evan Hill, Ainara Tiefenthäler, Christiaan Triebert, Drew Jordan, Haley Willis and Robin Stein, June 1, 2020; New York Times.

2 Matt Furber, John Eligon and Audra D. S. Burch, ‘Minneapolis Police, Long Accused of Racism, Face Wrath of Wounded City’, NY Times, May 28, 2020

3 Jake Johnson, ‘ Disgusting Display’: Police Fire Rubber Bullets, Stun Grenades, and Tear Gas at Demonstrators Protesting Killing of George Floyd, Common Dreams’ May 27, 2020,

4 Associated Press, ’Attorney: Breonna Taylor ‘Executed’ by Police in Her Home’, New York Times, May 20, 2020’

5 Kate Abbey-Lambertz,These 15 Black Women Were Killed During Police Encounters. Their Lives Matter, Too, 02/13/2015HuffPost US. ,

6 Andy Newman, The Death Of Eric Garner, And The Events That Followed,’New York Times, Dec. 3, 2014.

7 J. David Goodman and Al Baker, Wave of Protests After Grand Jury Doesn’t Indict Officer in Eric Garner Chokehold Case 3 Dec 2014.

8 Constitutional Rights And The Grand Jury, Hearing Before The Subcommittee On The Constitution Of The Committee On The Judiciary House Of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Second Session July 27, 2000, Serial No. 114.

9 http://grandjuryresistance.org/reformlinks.html

10 Tom Scheck, Brandt Williams, Nikki Pederson, As prosecutor, Klobuchar let grand juries decide police-involved fatalities; 25 March, 2019. SC Times

11 Marx and Engels, The German Ideology, ‘The Leipzig Council: II Saint Max; II Law’; Volume 5 of CW Ibid; p. 329.

12 Elizabeth Hinton, ,The Minneapolis Uprising in Context; Boston Review, May 29, 2020.

13 Linda Villarosa, L. Kasimu Harris, A Terrible Price: The deadly Racial Disparities of COVID-19 in America. New York Times, April 29, 2020.

14 Michael Barbaro, Adizah Eghan, Alexandra Leigh Young, Sydney Harper and Luke Vander Ploeg, and edited by Lisa Chow; ‘Why Is the Pandemic Killing So Many Black Americans? Racial disparities in the death rate contradict the claim that the novel coronavirus is “the great equalizer.” May 20th, 2020; NYT

15 John Eligon, Audra D. S. Burch, Dionne Searcey and Richard A. Oppel Jr. Black Americans Face Alarming Rates of Coronavirus Infection in Some States, April 7, 2020

16 Macinko J, Elo I,‘ Black-white differences in avoidable mortality in the USA, 1980-2005.’; J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Sep;63(9):715-21.

17 Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. Intersecting U.S. Epidemics: COVID-19 and Lack of Health Insurance. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 7:M20-1491

18 NYT Katie Glueck, Joe Biden Laces Into Trump for Fanning ‘Flames of Hate’

19 Hari Kumar, What is Behind Trump – Is There Method Behind His Madness? Finance Capital and Industrial Capital – An Evolutionary History; 2019;

20 Michael Roberts, A war economy?; March 30, 2020; The Michael Roberts Blog.

21 Patricia Cohen, Many Jobs May Vanish Forever as Layoffs Mount With over 38 million U.S. unemployment claims in nine weeks, one economist says the situation is “grimmer than we thought. New York Times; May 21, 2020

22 Tamika Mallory Speech

23 Asian Minnesotans Against Racism & Xenophobia Collaborative, Open Letter to Community: A call for unity and solidarity in the face of violence; May 29, 2020.

24 Karl Marx, Capital Vol 1”; Pelican edition Tr Ben Fowkes London 1976; p. 414.

25 Tami Luhby, US black-white inequality in 6 stark charts; CNN.

26 Emily Badger, June 2, 2020, Beverly Hills, Buckhead, SoHo: The New Sites of Urban Unrest,New York Times.

27 Aaron Mak, Target Has A Long History With The Minneapolis Police; May 29, 2020. ‘Slate’.

28 Roman White, Minnesota Attorney General Suggests Auto Zone Starters was ‘Provcateur; May 29, 2020; ‘The Source’.

29 Tess Owen, Roberto Daza, and Amel Guettatfi, 3 Young White Guys With a Machete Beat Up a Nonwhite Protester in Minneapolis,

30 Robert Evans and Jason Wilson, The Boogaloo Movement Is Not What You Think, May 27, 2020.

31 Ahmed Nada, Some Words of Advice for our Comrades in the Streets; 31 May 2020; at ‘Cosmonaut”.

32 Rebecca Shabad, Where does the phrase ‘When the looting starts, the shooting starts’ come from?, NBC News.

33 Frederick Engels, Origins of the Family, Private Property, and the State IX. Barbarism and Civilization.

34 Candice Bernd, As Trump Threatens to Send Military Into Cities, Some GIs Refuse to Comply‘ Truthout’; June 3 2020;

35 The Associated Press: Rodney King riot: Timeline of key events; April 26, 2017.

36 Peter Baker, Maggie Haberman, Katie Rogers, Zolan Kanno-Youngs and Katie Benner. Videos by Haley Willis, Christiaan Triebert and DavidBotti. ‘How Trump’s Idea for a Photo Op Led to Havoc in a Park’; New York Times, June 2, 2020.

37 Nick Waters,US Law Enforcement Are Deliberately Targeting Journalists During George Floyd Protests, May 31, 2020.

38 Elizabeth Hinton, ,The Minneapolis Uprising in Context; Boston Review, May 29, 2020.

39 Dominic Rushe, Covid-19 a ‘wake-up call’ to build fairer society, says billionaire JP Morgan boss; The Guardian

40 V. I. Lenin, The Collapse of the Second International Works, Moscow 1974, Volume 21, pages 205-259.

41 Michael Tackett, Trump Promised a Manufacturing Renaissance. What Happens in 2020 in Places That Lost Those Jobs? New York Times, June 24, 2019.

42 J.R.Reed, President Trump ordered US firms to ditch China, but many already have and more are on the way; Sep 4 2019; CNBC News.

43 Trump administration pushing to rip global supply chains from China: Officials; MSN, PRESS TV; 5/4/2020;

Mary Shelley

Rebellious Daughters of History #21 by Judy Cox Mary Shelley (1797-1851) Mary Shelley was the daughter of the radical philosopher William Godwin and the famous feminists, Mary Wollstonecraft who died days after Mary’s birth. Mary grew up with five semi-related siblings in an unconventional but intellectually electric household. At the age of 16, Mary eloped […]


Rebellious Daughters of History #21

by Judy Cox

Mary Shelley (1797-1851)

Mary Shelley was the daughter of the radical philosopher William Godwin and the famous feminists, Mary Wollstonecraft who died days after Mary’s birth. Mary grew up with five semi-related siblings in an unconventional but intellectually electric household.

At the age of 16, Mary eloped to Italy with the poet Percy Bysshe Shelley. Each encouraged the other’s writing, and they married in 1816 after the suicide of Shelley’s wife. They had four children, of whom only one survived.

A ghost-writing contest on a stormy night with Lord Byron at Lake Geneva in 1816 when Mary was just 20, inspired Frankenstein, the first true work of science-fiction and powerful exploration of the destructive nature of power when allied to wealth. It was an instant wonder, and spawned a mythology all its own that endures to this day.

After Percy Shelley drowned in 1822, Mary returned to London and pursued a very successful writing career as a novelist, biographer, editor of Shelleys poetry, which would not have been published without her, and single mum.

Mary did not abandon the radicalism she had shared with Shelley, as many suggested. Mary was lifelong reformer and feminist. She supported all European revolutionary movements and wrote articles for Leigh Hunt’s radical periodical The Liberal. She also corresponded with radical abolitionist and feminist Frances Wright who invited her to join her utopian community in Tennessee.

Mary had affairs with women. Writing to her close friend in 1835, Mary recalled her loneliness saying: “I was so ready to give myself away – and being afraid of men, I was apt to get tousy-mousy for women.” (Tousy-mousy was sexual slang for vagina). She was also instrumental in procuring fake passports for two friends, Isabel Robinson and Mary Diana Dods, to flee to Paris and live there as man and wife.

Her novels, such as Lodore and Falkner, had strongly feminist plots. Valperga was a feminist, republican version of Walter Scott’s historical novels. Mary’s works often argue that women were the ways to reform civil society. She died aged just 54.

Her poem Ode to Ignorance (1834) is scathing account of how the tyrannies of her day are sustained by military might and ideological control. She calls for hope in possibilities of change. It is as powerful and militant as the brilliant poems written by her husband (it’s a bit long but you can read whole version here.

Ode to Ignorance

Hail, Ignorance! majestic queen!
Mysterious, mighty, dark, profound in mien!
Sprung from no upstart brood of Light,
But of the ancient house of Night!
Daughter of that stupendous line,
Which ere the base-born Sun did shine,
Or one plebeian star appear’d,
Their awful throne in chaos rear’d-
The old nobility of Hell,
Who through the realms of darkness wide,
With lordly morgue and feudal pride
Did reign, and when imperial Satan fell,
By rebel cherubim cast down
And robb’d of his ancestral crown,
Received him like a Bourbon there.
With fond aristocratic care.

Hail! bounteous mother of each royal race;
Corruption, Bigotry, and Fraud,
Reflect thy dim patrician face;
They many a kingdom fair and broad,
Great Ignorance, receive from thee–
Thou who didst take the World in fee!
Ay! thou dost call the total earth thy own;
And every tyrant for his throne
Doth homage at thy knee!
Thou dost for kings, in dungeons bind
The anarch Truth, the rebel Mind,
Who never slip their iron bolts
But some fair realm revolts,
All hail! Legitimacy’s star!
Protectress of the despot Czar!
Thee Czars invoke, and, gorged with Polish blood,
Hallow thy name, and style thee great and good!
Night of the Mind, how long, how long,
Thy praise hath blazoned been in song!
Hail! mighty, mighty queen!
August ! Serene!
Peers are thy children-noble peers!
Thou sucklest them upon thy breasts;
Thine is their youth, and thine their years.
Transfus’d on them, thy ample spirit rests:
Night of the Mind! all hail!
Gloomy and grand,
Through every land,
Great queen! dost thou prevail!

But, hah! what hideous change is this?
What damn’d magician interrupts thy bliss?
The eye-ball aches,
And flashes on the sight a horrid gleam
Alas, His Day that breaks!
‘Tis orient knowledge darts that baleful beam-
Knowledge, thy dauntless foe!
Where wilt thou fly, how shun the blow?
What work, what palisade behind?
Night of the mind!
Thy sons are stricken with dismay;
They cannot bear
The hateful glare,
But curse the name of Day.
Prelates wake who long have slumber’d,
Peers believe their days are number’d,
Priests before their altars tremble,
Courtiers shudder, kings dissemble,
Pensioners and place-men quake,
All the sons of rapine shake;
Guillotines are lordly themes,
Barricades haunt royal dreams,
Bigots frighted to their souls,
Shrink into their narrow holes,
To den of filth corruption steals,
Reform fierce-barking at his heels,
All expect disastrous doom,
All the things that love the gloom,
All that crouch, and skulk, and prowl,
Wolf and tiger, bat and owl;
Yet still to thee, their bounteous patroness,
They lift adoring eyes;
And none apostatize,
Nor aught the less
Thy name they bless,
Because thy kingdom hath been rudely torn,
And of a mist or two thy stupid skull been shorn.
Oh! for thy loyal sons
Hast thou no guerdon fair, no just reward?
No new resource,
No untried force,
To save them from their foe abhorr’d?
Come with a host of Huns!
Unlock once more thy garners of the North:
Unleash the Goth and send the Vandal forth;
Exert thy waning might;
Rally the powers of Night;
Renew the desp’rate fight!
That tyrants may rebuild thy mouldering fanes:
So may’st hope,
Loading thy foes with slavery’s ponderous chains,
With holy, heavenly light, triumphantly to cope!

Rose Pastor Stokes and Rani Lakshmibai

Rebellious Daughters of History #20 by Judy Cox From Celebrity Cinderella to Communist: Rose Pastor Stokes (1879-1933) Rose Pastor Stokes was born into poverty, ‘I slipped into the world while my mother was on her knees, scrubbing the floor’, she later recalled. Born Rose Harriet Wieslander in Poland, 1879, and moved to England with her […]


09/06/2020


Rebellious Daughters of History #20

by Judy Cox

From Celebrity Cinderella to Communist: Rose Pastor Stokes (1879-1933)

Rose Pastor Stokes was born into poverty, ‘I slipped into the world while my mother was on her knees, scrubbing the floor’, she later recalled.

Born Rose Harriet Wieslander in Poland, 1879, and moved to England with her single mother when she was three. She lived in slums of London’s East End and started work at the age of eight. Her mother married Israel Pastor and they resettled in Cleveland, America. In 1890, Rose found work in a ‘buck-eye’,”a cigar-sweatshop. Israel Pastor abandoned the family, Rose became the breadwinner for her mother and her four siblings.

In 1901, she began contributing to Yidishes Tageblat (Jewish Daily News) and was employed as a columnist in New York City. She continued to write articles, plays and poems for the rest of her life.

For one assignment, Rose interviewed James Graham Phelps Stokes, a reform-minded millionaire. Their relationship caused a sensation. On 6 April 1905, the front page of the New York Times headlined with ‘J. G. Phelps Stokes to Wed Young Jewess’, calling Rose the ‘Cinderella of the sweatshops’.

In 1906, the couple joined the Socialist Party of America and became a prominent speaker. In 1909 Rose took part in the Shirtwaist Strike which involved 40,000 New York garment workers. In May and June 1912, She lead a strike by the New York City restaurant and hotel workers. Rose also distributed birth control information.

Rose was an opponent of the First World War and was arrested on March 22, 1918, for an anti-war speech in Kansas City, Missouri, in which she declared, ‘No government which is for the profiteers can also be for the people, and I am for the people, while the government is for the profiteers’.

Rose became more radical than her millionaire husband and they divorced. She was a founder member of the Communist Party of American in 1919 and was elected to its Central Executive Committee, taking charge of the Women’s Work Department. She was a delegate to the Comintern’s Fourth World Congress in Moscow in 1922 where she submitted a minority report on the ‘Negro question.’

Rose remarried in 1927, to Jerome Isaac Romain, a Russian-Polish Jewish Communist. In 1929 she was arrested during a garment workers’ strike. An activist in the Lower East Side, Rose became known as ‘Rose of the Ghetto’.

On June 20, 1933, Rose died in Germany, where she had been treated for breast cancer. She was 53 years old.

Rose began writing her autobiography in 1924 and gave it to Samuel Ornitz, a communist writer, and later member of the blacklisted Hollywood Ten, but he did not finish it. It was called ‘I Belong to the Working Class’.

Rose Pastor Stokes wrote ‘Patterson’ in 1913 and it was published in Crystal and Max Eastman’s paper The Masses

Patterson
Our folded hands again are at the loom.
The air
Is ominous with peace.
But what we weave you see not through the gloom.
‘Tis terrible with doom.
Beware!
You dream that we are weaving what you will?
Take care!
Our fingers do not cease:
We’ve starved–and lost; but we are weavers
still;
And Hunger’s in the mill!…
And Hunger moves the Shuttle forth and back.
Take care!
The product grows and grows …
A shroud it is; a shroud of ghastly black.
We’ve never let you lack!
Beware!
The Warp and Woof of Misery and Defeat…
Take care!–
See how the Shuttle goes!
Our bruistd hearts with bitter hopes now beat:
The Shuttle’s sure–and fleet!….

Princess Mutineer: Rani Lakshmibai

Rani Lakshmibai was born in 1828 in Varanasi into a rich Brahmin family. Rani married the Maharaja of Jhansi in May 1842. She gave birth to a boy in 1851. Her husband died in 1853 and British East India Company, which ruled India, annexed the state. Rani was ordered to leave her palace.

On 10 May 1857 the Indian Rebellion, a mass uprising against British rule, erupted. In June 1857, rebels seized the Fort of Jhansi and massacred 40 to 60 British officers.

When mutineers left Jhansi and Rani took over the city. She set up a foundry to cast cannon and assembled a military force to defend the city.

In March 1858 British forces arrived aiming reconquer Jhansi. When Commander Hugh Rose demanded the surrender of the city, Rani issued a proclamation:

‘We fight for independence. In the words of Lord Krishna, we will if we are victorious, enjoy the fruits of victory, if defeated and killed on the field of battle, we shall surely earn eternal glory and salvation’.

Sir Hugh Rose’s forces besieged Jhansi in March 1858 and in April he launched an assault. Rani lead determined resistance to the British forces who slaughtered men, women and children. Rani fled the city with her son and joined the Indian mutineers occupying the city of Gwalior.

When General Rose’s forces attacked Gwalior in June, Rani lead the resistance. British forces slaughtered 5,000 Indian soldiers and inflicted a decisive defeat on the rebels. Rani was killed by a British soldier.

Sir Hugh Rose described her as ‘remarkable in her bravery, cleverness and perseverance … the most dangerous of all the rebel leaders,” and called her “a sort of Indian Joan of Arc’.

Colonel Malleson wrote about Rani in his History of the Indian Mutiny: ‘Whatever her faults in British eyes may have been, her countrymen will ever remember that she was driven by ill-treatment into rebellion, and that she lived and died for her country, We cannot forget her contribution for India’.

Subhadra Kumari Chauhan (1904 – 1948) was an Indian poet. One of her most popular poems is ‘Jhansi ki Rani’ about the courageous Queen of Jhansi.

The thrones shook and royalties scowled
Old India was re-invigorated with new youth
People realised the value of lost freedom
Everybody was determined to throw the foreigners out
The old sword glistened again in 1857
This story we heard from the mouths of Bundel bards
Like a man she fought, she was the Queen of Jhansi

Charlotte Despard and Josephine Baker

Rebellious Daughters of History #19 by Judy Cox Suffragist, Socialist, Republican, Communist: Charlotte Despard (1844-1939) Charlotte French was born in Kent in 1844. When she was ten her father died and her mother was committed to an asylum. In 1870, Charlotte met Maximilian Carden Despard, a wealthy businessman. When he died in 1890, Charlotte dedicated […]


08/06/2020


Rebellious Daughters of History #19

by Judy Cox

Suffragist, Socialist, Republican, Communist: Charlotte Despard (1844-1939)

Charlotte French was born in Kent in 1844. When she was ten her father died and her mother was committed to an asylum.

In 1870, Charlotte met Maximilian Carden Despard, a wealthy businessman. When he died in 1890, Charlotte dedicated her life to fighting for socialism. In 1894 Charlotte was elected as a Poor Law Guardian in Lambeth.

She joined the Social Democratic Federation and later the Independent Labour Party. She became friends with Eleanor Marx and was a delegate to the Second International in London in 1896. She campaigned against the Boer War as a “wicked war of this Capitalistic government”

Charlotte joined the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU). On 23rd October, 1906, Charlotte was arrested during a protest meeting at the House of Commons. In 1907 she was imprisoned twice in Holloway Prison.

Despard spent time in Ireland and in 1908 she helped to form the Irish Women’s Franchise League.

In 1909 she met Gandhi and, influenced by his theory of passive resistance, Charlotte and 70 others left the WSPU to form the Women’s Freedom League (WFL). The WFL was a militant but non-violent. From 1912 to 1921, Charlotte had an intense, passionate relationship with Kate Harvey, another pacifist feminist.

Charlotte supported the workers during the Dublin lock out of 1913. She was a tireless and courageous opponent of World War One. In 1918, when women finally won the vote, Charlotte became the Labour Party candidate for Battersea but was defeated.

In 1920 Despard toured Ireland, collecting first-hand evidence of army and police atrocities and helped to set up the Women’s Prisoners’ Defence League to support republican prisoners. Charlotte became involved in the Sinn Fein campaign for a united Ireland.

In 1930 Charlotte toured the Soviet Union and joined the Communist Party of Great Britain and became secretary of the Friends of Soviet Russia organization. She was an active anti-fascist and powerful public speaker.

Charlotte Despard died on 10th November 1939, after a fall in her new house near Belfast.

Resistance, civil rights and stardom: Josephine Baker (1906 – 1975)

Josephine Baker, who spent most of her life in Paris, was a celebrated performer at the Folies Bergère in Paris. Her performances caused a sensation and she became an icon of the Jazz Age.

Josephine renounced her U.S. citizenship and became a French national after her marriage to French industrialist Jean Lion in 1937. She raised her children in France.

She aided the French Resistance during World War II and was awarded the Croix de guerre by the French military, and was named a Chevalier of the Légion d’honneur by General Charles de Gaulle.

Baker supported the Civil Rights Movement during the 1950s. On a visit to New York Josephine and her husband were refused reservations at 36 hotels and she wrote articles about the segregation in the United States. She also began traveling into the South and giving talks on “France, North Africa And The Equality Of The Races In France”.

She refused to perform for segregated audiences in the United States. Her insistence on mixed audiences helped to integrate live entertainment shows in Las Vegas. She received threatening phone calls from the Ku Klux Klan but said she was not afraid of them.

Josephine worked with the NAACP and was presented with life membership. In 1963, she spoke at the March on Washington at the side of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. While wearing her Free French uniform, she introduced the ‘Negro Women for Civil Rights’.

In her powerful speech, Josephine said:

‘I have walked into the palaces of kings and queens and into the houses of presidents. And much more. But I could not walk into a hotel in America and get a cup of coffee, and that made me mad. And when I get mad, you know that I open my big mouth. And then look out, ’cause when Josephine opens her mouth, they hear it all over the world.’

Josephine continued to perform throughout her life. On 8 April 1975, Baker starred in a revue, celebrating 50 years in show business and won rave reviews. Four days later, Baker was found lying in bed. She died aged 68 on 12 April 1975.

Lucy Parsons, Claire Lacombe and Pauline Leon

Rebellious Daughters of History #18 by Judy Cox Racism, Riot and Unceasing Revolt: Lucy Parsons (1851-1942) Lucy Parsons was born in Virginia in 1851, the daughter of a slave. In 1863, she was moved to Texas where she worked as a seamstress and a cook for white families. In 1870, Lucy was living with a […]


07/06/2020


Rebellious Daughters of History #18

by Judy Cox

Racism, Riot and Unceasing Revolt: Lucy Parsons (1851-1942)

Lucy Parsons was born in Virginia in 1851, the daughter of a slave. In 1863, she was moved to Texas where she worked as a seamstress and a cook for white families. In 1870, Lucy was living with a former slave, Oliver Gathing, and had a baby who died at birth. In 1871, Lucy married a white man, Albert Parsons. They were driven out of Texas by racists and settled in Chicago, Illinois.

Lucy began writing for The Socialist and The Alarm, the journal of the International Working People’s Association. In the 1880s, she led marches of seamstresses in Chicago. On 4 May 1886, Albert addressed a rally at Haymarket Square, organised to protest against police violence during a May Day strike.

Lucy was in the crowd when police moved in, a bomb was thrown at them and they shot several protesters dead. The authorities arrested eight men and, despite a lack of evidence, executed four activists. Albert was one of them. Protests against these judicial murders were beginning of May Day labour rallies in the US.

Lucy refused to be silenced. She spoke alongside William Morris and Peter Kropotkin during a visit to Great Britain in 1888. In the 1890s, she published Freedom: A Revolutionary Anarchist-Communist Monthly. In 1905 Lucy joined in the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), and began editing the Liberator. She organized the Chicago Hunger Demonstrations in January 1915.

In the 1920s, the Chicago Police Department described Lucy as “more dangerous than a thousand rioters”. In 1925 she worked with the National Committee of the International Labor Defense in 1927, a Communist-led organization that defended labour activists and victimised Black people. Historians believe that Lucy joined the Communist Party in 1939.

In her 80s, Lucy continued to speak out against capitalism. One of her last major appearances was in 1941 when she addressed striking workers at International Harvester.
Lucy died on March 7, 1942, in house fire. Her lover, George Markstall, died the next day from injuries he received trying to save her.

She was approximately 91 years old. After her death, police seized her 1,500 books. She is buried near her husband, near the Haymarket Martyrs’ Monument in Forest Park, Illinois.

Revolutionary Republican and Armed: Claire Lacombe (1765-?) and Pauline Leon (1768 – 1838)

Claire was an actress but when she arrived in Paris in 1792, in the middle of the Great French Revolution, she left acting to become a revolutionary. Pauline was born to a family of Parisian chocolate makers and became a political radical after witnessing the execution of leaders of a bread riot.

Like many working women, Claire and Pauline asserted their right to speak, to vote and to bear arms in defence of the revolution. Pauline took part in the women’s march to Versailles in 1789. During the insurrection of 10 August 1792, they both took part in the storming of the Tuileries. Claire was shot through the arm but kept fighting and was awarded a medal for her courage.

In May 1793, the two women united to set up The Society of Revolutionary Republican Women, the most radical female revolutionary organisation of the French Revolution. The society first acted as Jacobin Sans Culottes and then the more radical Enragés. They demanded that women be armed to defend the revolutionary republic and that women should have the right to vote in the councils of the Revolutionary Committee.

Claire lived with Théophile Leclerc, leader of the Enrages, and supporter of women’s rights. They broke up and Pauline married him. Under the Reign of Terror, the Enragés were suppressed as was the Society of Revolutionary Republican Women.

On September 16 1793, Claire was publicly denounced as a counter-revolutionary to the Committee of General Security. She was arrested and released in August 1795. She went back to the theatre but soon left and vanished into obscurity. In May 1794 Pauline and her husband were arrested and held separately in prison but later released.

Pauline died at home on 5 October 1838.