The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Berlin orders removal of memorial statue against wartime sexual violence against women

Attack on artistic freedom and freedom of expression: The Berlin District Office of Mitte bows to pressure from the Japanese government and revokes authorisation for the Statue of Peace in Moabit


12/10/2020


Statement by Korea Verband, October 8, 2020

 

Last Wednesday (October 7th) the district mayor of Mitte, Stephan von Dassel, ordered the Berlin Korea Verband to remove the Statue of Peace (which was unveiled on September 28, 2020) within a week. The main reason cited for the removal is “current difficulties interfering with German-Japanese relations”. Immediately after the unveiling of the statue, the Japanese government in Tokyo complained and put pressure on the Foreign Office, the Berlin Senate, and the Mitte District Office, demanding its removal. It took only a few days for Berlin to cave in, and in doing so is attempting to restrict fundamental rights to freedom of expression and artistic freedom.

The “Comfort Women” working group of the Berlin Korea Verband unveiled the Statue of Peace in late September in collaboration with other civil society organisations from South Korea and Germany. It commemorates the fate of the so-called “comfort women”, the hundreds of thousands of girls and women who were kidnapped by the Japanese military during the Asia-Pacific War (1931–1945) and forced into sexual slavery. These are historical facts that Japanese right-wingers and nationalists have been denying and attempting to suppress for decades.

“The Berlin District Office of Mitte is constructing flimsy pseudo-arguments to accommodate the Japanese government,” says Nataly Jung-Hwa Han, chairwoman of the Korea Verband. “Since the very beginning, the Korea Verband has worked in a very transparent fashion and also pointed out that the Japanese government will most likely firmly object. The responsible commission Art in Urban Space / Art in Architecture has never asked to see the exact wording of the plaque at the base of the statue, Han says. “Its content corresponds exactly to what we wrote in our permit application. The Berlin District Office of Mitte knew that the statue would address the proven crimes of the Imperial Japanese Army.”

The Korea Verband is a German organisation that has been active for more than thirty years. The majority of its work is done by German citizens, completely independently of both the North and South Korean governments. This was also the case for the preparatory work for the Statue of Peace in Berlin, because the focus of the artwork is on those affected by sexual violence.

Referring to the wartime sexual violence in Asia during World War II, the statue’s message is, above all, to commemorate the courage of the women who, as survivors, broke the silence. It admonishes everyone to “take a stand against this violence so that these crimes will never be repeated anywhere in the world,” as the inscription reads. The statue calls for peace, democracy, women’s rights, and human rights, which is why it is called the “Statue of Peace”. It was given the afffectionate nickname “Ari” (Armenian for “courage”) to honour to the courage of the survivors and also to draw attention to the genocide in Armenia.

“The Korea Verband expected the red-red-green coalition in the Senate and the district mayor von Dassel to rise to the challenge and show more political backbone. A constitutional democracy is supposed to protect freedom of expression and artistic freedom, not attempt to restrict these due to pressure from a foreign government,”

says Han, chairwoman of the Korea Verband. “The Mitte District Office made its decision without even talking to us. However, we continue to seek dialogue with the Mitte District Office.

The Korea Verband is considering taking legal action against the revocation of the installation permit.

This is not the first time the Japanese government Tokyo demands for a “comfort women” statue to be removed

In early October Japan’s Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi had directly asked Heiko Maas to remove the statue. This is not the first time that the Japanese government protests a Statue of Peace in Germany. In 2016 for example, the city of Freiburg bowed to Japanese pressure after its Japanese sister city Matsuyuma threatened to terminate the city partnership. In 2017, explanatory plaques on a statue erected in the Nepal Himalayan Park in Wiesent near Regensburg were also removed under pressure from the Japanese embassy in Germany. In the present case, the Mitte District Office also cited concerns about the future of the town twinning as a factor for its decision, as it sees the statue as a threat to amicable inter-city relations, and criticised the explanatory texts. But it is a work of art and as such, it should not be censored!

There have been similar cases in South Korea and the Philippines, where the Japanese government pressured the South Korean and the Philippine governments into removing the Statue of Peace. But in South Korea, the strong civil society protested and successfully prevented the removal.

There will be a ,,demonstration against the removal of the statue on Tuesday, 13 October at 12 noon on the corner of Birkenstraße and Bremer Straße. This will end with a rally at Rathaus Moabit at 1pm

Cleaning lady: a job like any other?

On Women’s Day this year, which seems a million years ago now, a time when we were all suddenly realizing that just because hysterical hypochondriacs thought they probably had COVID-19 didn’t automatically mean it wasn’t actually really fucking terrible (God, what a horrible realization that was!), the UK Guardian published a feminist article by Sally […]


10/10/2020


On Women’s Day this year, which seems a million years ago now, a time when we were all suddenly realizing that just because hysterical hypochondriacs thought they probably had COVID-19 didn’t automatically mean it wasn’t actually really fucking terrible (God, what a horrible realization that was!), the UK Guardian published a feminist article by Sally Howard, entitled, somewhat melodramatically, I thought: “Is it ever acceptable to hire a cleaner?”

“The day my cleaner used to visit,” the article begins, “I would return home in the evening to the smell of Dettol mixed with Tania’s sweat, to a clean kitchen and a drenching sense of guilt.”

It’s a white woman thing, a bit, feeling guilty about paying for a cleaner, I think. I’ve never felt this guilt – it’s a guilt I’ve never shared. Even when my cleaner came from Bangladesh, I just told her about how my dad spoke Bengali with a British accent, and didn’t feel overly guilty. Shame yes – shame at being such a terrible housewife, shame at letting someone come inside your home and see your dirt, shame at failing – guilt, no. But to be honest, I’m not an overly guilty kind of person!

White feminists feel a lot of guilt about paying for professional help to clean their private homes. It’s something that unites white feminists and white sexists, actually, interestingly enough.

In the book I just published with Nautilus, Die Schlechteste Hausfrau der Welt, my friend, nicknamed Pegida-Kevin, (as you can tell from his nickname, he’s not exactly the most woke guy on Earth!) accuses my friend Zandra, who considers herself a feminist, albeit a bad one, of hypocrisy and general rubbishness, for paying a cleaner from Poland fifteen euros an hour “under the table” to come and clean her flat for her.

“’You disgust me!”’ Pegida-Kevin says, loudly, angrily – and sarcastically. ‘White men are all rapists – but this poor woman from Poland should come and clean for you for just fifteen euros an hour!’”

Zandra doesn’t even understand the argument because she herself earns only twelve euros an hour. But there are a lot of rich, white women who earn more than Zandra – and pay their cleaners less than her. Some of these women call themselves feminists, some even think they are good feminists! Are they hypocrites? Is what they are doing unacceptable?

I think it’s super-interesting, this argument. Is it ever acceptable to hire a cleaner, Sally Howard asked in the Guardian on Women’s Day. Well, yes, it certainly is. Nobody has feminist dilemmas about paying people to clean our nursery schools, our schools, our hospitals, our streets. Our public parks get cleaned. My little brother used to clean ambulances for a living. How come people can clean public spaces without bringing feminism into it – but as soon as it is the private sphere, it suddenly becomes this great feminist betrayal?

People say – well, white people say, mainly, it is a white thing – that paying for a cleaner is “outsourcing” your feminism. But why is it not a feminist issue that we all pay – through taxes, and I think, Betriebskosten – to get our rubbish taken from our house to the Mülldepot? Paying someone to take your rubbish down to the collective rubbish bins is some kind of feminist failure – but paying people to drive your trash from your collective bin area to the public waste site is okay? What happens to that rubbish on its journey from the kitchen to the public bin area? Why does it suddenly lose its association with feminism, or femininity?

The only reason it is a feminist issue to pay for a cleaner inside your house, but not a feminist issue to pay a gardener outside the house, is because many people, including feminists, still see the dirt that is created inside the house as women’s responsibility. It is, essentially, an anti-feminist argument.

It’s true that cleaners – cleaning ladies and also, the less common cleaning men – are underpaid and overexploited. I actually think, and I’m not sure if I should be admitting this here, that it is fairer and more moral to pay your cleaning lady “Schwarz” than through Helpling. But I find it interesting that cleaning is the only job left in the Western society where people have these kind of qualms? Many people pay a babysitter Schwarz as often as once a fortnight or even twice a week. Nobody would think for a SECOND that you were robbing this person of their pension!?! And, while we are on the subject of pensions – Lieferando delivery drivers, TEFL teachers and socialist columnists are also fucked over 1750% when it comes to pensions, so maybe, instead of bringing feminism into it, we should be talking about socialism instead? Because I am not saying that capitalism doesn’t suck or poverty doesn’t exist here. What I am saying is that this is not a feminist issue!

And the thing I find most interesting is the idea that this work is so demeaning AND so disgusting that nobody can ever choose to do it. As with sex work, people talk about cleaning as if the thing you are being paid to do it so disgusting, you are just being paid to do what nobody else wants to do – there is no skill involved at all. Other people don’t want to suck dick/clean toilets, you are so poor and desperate you have no choice but to do it. Whereas some white feminists want to ban paid sex work, most people just think you should feel guilty about paying for a cleaner.

But here’s the thing: maybe it is because I am truly, truly, truly HORRENDOUSLY HORRIFICALLY frighteningly amazingly bad at cleaning – but I really do think it is a skilled job. If it wasn’t a skilled job, how could there be so many YouTube tutorials on how to descale your kettle? I think it’s a skilled job, and I think there must be moments when it is disgusting, but there must be moments when being a HNO doctor, a nursery school teacher or even a carer are disgusting too. As far as I am concerned, the yuckiness is not the point. A good cleaner is a skilled worker – and some cleaners are actually total fucking artists, that’s what. We should respect this job – not just as a job like any other, but a hard job. And we should pay cleaners our respect – and decent amounts of money, too.

When we talk about women revealing to the world that their partner, their ex-partner, (and it’s invariably cis-men is who I am talking about here), raped or hit them, we talk about them airing their dirty laundry in public. In both German and English we use this expression. I think perhaps it comes from times when men would hit women so hard they would bleed – or maybe even they would rape them so violently they would bleed. Some women would just wash these blood-stained sheets in public, at the river or the well maybe, and not try to hide away the stains which revealed the violence going on inside the house. And I can’t help feeling that some of our disgust about getting outside help with cleaning – paid, professional outside help, inside the privacy of our own home – this isn’t all to do with the poo stains on your toilet lid or the blood stains on your mattress or the dusty magazines under your bed. This is to do with male power over women. A man should be the king of his castle, and a woman should be his unpaid slave. And dirt, and the act of cleaning it up, should be unseen – and unpaid. I think this idea of the domestic becoming public, the inside turned outside, the man usurped as “owner” of the woman’s body, is the true reason why people find the idea of paying for someone to clean your bathroom disgusting and gross.

Let’s smash the patriarchy and capitalism at the same time! Tell our lazy cis-male partners to go fuck themselves, pay our cleaning ladies a decent wage for good, hard work and not confuse anti-feminist ideas with feminist ones.

Jacinta’s new book Die Schlechteste Hausfrau der Welt is now available in most good book stores (and several bad ones)

Anticolonial Berlin

Providing a voice for the marginalized


09/10/2020

Our goal is to connect and amplify the colonised and marginalised, to share strategies for organising and visions for the future. We want to offer a platform and space for activists in anticolonial struggles around the world to meet online. We also aim to link struggles between regions and metropoles, and to form common goals.

Last year, the launching of the Anticolonial Month in Berlin garnered astounding reach both in online space and physical attendance. The forums and workshops focusing on themes within the framework of anticolonial discourse were very well attended, with attendees and speakers alike highly engaged in discussions and debates. It culminated in one of the biggest migrant and people of color demonstrations in Berlin, which also coincided with the demonstration of Kurdish people against the Turkish invasion of Rojava.

This year we are continuing the work that has started last year, which deemed to carry out activities that strengthen, articulate and make visible the work of immigrants in Berlin, the current capital of European imperialism, in an anti-colonial perspective.

The anti-colonial month this year starts on the 10/10 with the anti-Columbus kundgebung with infostands that is being organized by Latin Americans, from 14h to 18h and will go until the 15/11 (date of the Berlin conference when Africa was divided among european countries).

Due to the limitations imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic, most of the activities this year will be carried out online. These activities and events will be in the form of lectures, forums or online workshops. In this regard, we are inviting all interested organisations to propose activities and send us so we can add to the calendar, popularize it through our platform and networks. In the end, we will do an assembly to discuss the process.

We propose some thematic axes for the different weeks of the anticolonial month, these are transversal themes that can unite the agenda of different collectives:

  • Indigenous peoples and the struggle for ancestral territories

  • Incarceration and state violence

  • Racial capitalism and migration

  • Repression exports: arms exports and military training

John Lennon – Protest from the car boot

On the 80th anniversary of John Lennon’s birth, we republish this article, originally written for the 75th anniversary


On October 9 2015, John Lennon would have been 75 years old. Phil Butland recalled that there was more to his life and art than the Beatles and hippy peace songs

We will have to celebrate John Lennon’s birthday without him. This is because of another, much more tragic anniversary: 35 years ago, on December 8th 1980, Lennon was shot dead by Mark David Chapman. The musician had just released his first album in five years.

People generally remember Lennon as the hippie pacifist who wrote songs like “Imagine”, “Give Peace a Chance” and “All You Need is Love”. He was this person, but he was also much more. His artistic and political vision constantly developed – sometimes forwards, sometimes backwards, but was rarely static. Within his short life time, he was a rebellious rocker, a pliant boy band member, a mystic, and, for a short time, an active revolutionary socialist.

The Influence of working-class and port cities

Lennon’s early development is closely linked to two cities – his hometown Liverpool and Hamburg, where the Beatles learned how to perform. Both are predominantly working-class port cities, and were the first contact points for American sailors bringing rock and roll music to Europe.

In the 1950s, pop music was still a new phenomenon, a breath of fresh air in conservative post-war Europe and America. But by the time the Beatles moved to Hamburg in 1960, the nascent music scene had already undergone its first crisis.

In an interview in August 2015, Lemmy, the lead singer of Motörhead, recalled the first generation of rebellious musicians: “the first time around, we had people like Elvis, Little Richard, Chuck Berry, Jerry Lee Lewis – all them people. And they were gone within two years. Chuck Berry was in jail [for transporting a minor across a state line for immoral purposes]. Jerry Lee’s career had been destroyed by the British press [for marrying his 13-year-old cousin]. Elvis was in the fucking army … And then we got Bobby Rydell and all them ****s. It took us a couple of years to get rid of them, then the Beatles showed up. That was all right.”

Bobby Rydell’s departure from our collective memory is no tragedy. Nonetheless, at the start of the 1960s, the charts were dominated by kitsch bubblegum pop produced by him and his contemporaries. In contrast, the Beatles played songs by black artists such as Chuck Berry, Little Richard and the Isley Brothers – artists who were rarely played on the radio, and whose records were hard to find in record shops.

It was only in port cities like Liverpool and Hamburg that the local youth had access to black American music, shipped ashore by passing sailors. A subculture started to grow, which by-passed the capital cities. By geographical accident, the Beatles found themselves at the centre of a decisive moment in the history of modern music.

Artificial war against the Rolling Stones

The Beatles’ early rebellious phase did not last long. Manager Brian Epstein encouraged Lennon to swap the leather jacket that he had worn on the Reeperbahn for a smart suit and sensible haircut. A phoney war with the Rolling Stones was created, with the Stones depicted as rebels, and the Beatles as nice young men, whom a girl could take back to their parents.

Much of this war was fought through song titles – Jagger implored his fans to “Spend the Night Together”, while the Beatles only offered to Hold Your Hand. Jagger had Sympathy for the Devil, while the Beatles just wanted a Little Help from My Friends. The Stones couldn’t get No Satisfaction, while the Beatles passively suggested Letting it Be.

Nonetheless, Lennon’s songs from the period are still outstanding, and the Beatles were never as mild as their manager liked to portray. But their incomparable chart success was always dependent on a degree of artistic compromise.

British Prime Minister Harold Wilson was quick to recognise the political potential of identifying himself with the Beatles. Wilson’s constituency was in Liverpool, and he took office in 1964, at the peak of Beatlemania. Wilson was also born into the working-class – something which he shared with the Beatles – but not with his conservative predecessor Lord Alec Douglas Home.

Wilson spoke enthusiastically about the “White Heat of Technology” and supported the establishment of many new Universities, Polytechnics and art schools. Particularly the art schools provided a hotbed for future musicians, who took advantage of an education that was denied to their parents. These real developments meant that Lennon and the Beatles felt a natural affinity with Wilson’s Labour Party.

The highpoint of Wilson’s and the Beatles’ mutual admiration campaign came in 1965, when the four Beatles visited Wilson’s office in 10 Downing Street and were made Members of the British Empire (MBEs). Since then many musicians have been similarly honoured, but Wilson was the first leading politician who realised that he could reach a young generation of voters by rewarding pop musicians.

Lennon and 1968.

Three years later, this young generation was starting to lose its patience with Wilson. Many took to the streets against Wilson’s support for the Vietnam War – protests which were directly celebrated in Jagger’s song “Street Fighting Man”.

Lennon’s reaction was much more ambivalent. Like Jagger, he wrote a song about the movement, giving it the promising title of “Revolution”. Yet he sang “if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao / You ain’t gonna make it with anyone, anyhow”, and: “when you talk about destruction / Don’t you know that you can count me out”.

Even two months later, you could see how Lennon’s political understanding was developing. In the version of “Revolution” on the White Album, Lennon still sings “you can count me out”, but adds, in a slightly quieter voice “in”.

The year 1968 was a turning point both for the Stones and for Lennon. Jagger and co made their first tentative steps on the slippery slope towards conservatism and tax evasion. And Lennon entered his most radical phase.

In 1969, Lennon returned his MBE to the British queen with the statement “Your Majesty, I am returning my MBE as a protest against Britain’s involvement in the Nigeria/Biafra thing, against our support of America in Vietnam and against ‘Cold Turkey’ slipping down the charts. With love. John Lennon of Bag.” This was just the start.

Radical Appearances

He started to take part in demonstrations, even if his first appearances were somewhat idiosyncratic. At the demonstration for James Hanratty, one of the last victims of the death penalty in Britain, he demonstrated from inside a bag in the boot of a Rolls Royce. He joined a demonstration against nuclear weapons by telephone.

By 1971, he was starting to learn. The journalist Robin Denselow reports as follows: “Wearing denims and a jaunty black cap, he paraded through London carrying a poster ‘Red Mole for the IRA against British Imperialism’, and chanting ‘Power to the People’. The following day, 12 August, he sent £1,000 to the union Fighting Fund for the Upper Clyde Shipbuilders in Scotland.” [Red Mole was a revolutionary newspaper produced among others by Tariq Ali, who conducted many discussions with Lennon at this time]

Throughout his life, Lennon was a committed anti-racist. The Beatles continually refused to appear in apartheid South Africa, and Lennon remained active on this issue. In 1970, British activists successfully sabotaged games of the South African rugby team, The Springboks, incurring large fines. The mother of British socialist Sally Kincaid was one of the activists.

Sally explains what happened next.

“After the Springbok team was stopped from playing by massive numbers of anti-apartheid protesters occupying the pitch the police arrested huge numbers of those occupying. During a meeting to organise fund raising to pay for fines my mum suggested that they ask the Beatles to pay a benefit gig in Aberdeen…. She wrote to john Lennon with the request and he wrote back saying they were unavailable but sent a cheque to cover the fines.”

Political radicalization

Lennon’s political radicalisation was reflected in an artistic radicalisation. Although this was the period when he wrote “Imagine” and “Give Peace a Chance”, these are among the least interesting of his songs of the time. In “Working Class Hero” he called for class struggle against those who “hate you if you’re clever and they despise a fool.” And his political evolution since he wrote “Revolution” is clear in the lyrics of the song “Power to the People“. Now he was singing: “Say you want a revolution… We better get on right away We’ll you get on your feet, And out on the street “.

And then, on January 30th 1972, came “Bloody Sunday”. British troops shot dead 14 unarmed protestors in Derry, Northern Ireland. Lennon was living in New York by now, and participated in the protest there. He quickly released two songs, “Sunday Bloody Sunday” and “Luck of the Irish“, both bitter attacks against British imperialism: “A thousand years of torture and hunger Drove the people away from their land. A land full of beauty and wonder Was raped by the British brigands”.

Lennon 1972 album “Some Time in New York City” is his most explicitly political album. Unfortunately, it was also arguably the last time that he managed to produce an album’s worth of artistically relevant material. This does not mean that he was finished – in the ensuing years, he released (the IMHO highly underrated) “Mind Games“, and recorded the superlative “Fame” with David Bowie. Nonetheless by 1975 he had stopped producing music altogether, and would not do so in the subsequent 5 years.

Retreat in the late 1970s

This meant that, the artistic wave which produced punk, ‘Rock Against Racism’ and the mass mobilisations of British musicians against fascism passed Lennon by. While his contemporary Neil Young was celebrating the Sex Pistols’ Johnny Rotten in the song “Hey Hey My My”, Lennon was silent.

The nadir was maybe in 1975. In New York’s Central Park, activists organised a free concert to celebrate the end of the Vietnam War. The concert was directly across the street from the home of the singer who had issued posters saying “War is Over If You Want It”. Lennon did not even make it to the balcony of his penthouse suite.

How did Lennon sink into passivity so quickly? Part of the answer lies in the state of the US left. In 1972, when the ex-Beatle moved to New York, the momentum from 1968 was already dying down. The FBI had liquidated the Black Panthers. The socialists with whom Lennon did have contact – people like Jerry Rubin – were ultra-leftists with no social base. This meant that the man who once urged Tariq Ali to reach out to young workers, was left with no contact with the working class.

When Lennon started recording again in 1980, expectations were massive. But if we are brutally honest, the music that he produced was largely mediocre. The album “Double Fantasy” contains a few interesting songs and a lot of filler. The posthumously released album “Milk and Honey” is even more forgettable.

Celebrate Lennon’s life

We will never know whether Lennon would have found inspiration again, and to be honest that’s not the most important thing. He had already made a significant contribution. Between 1968 and 1975, he wrote and sang some of the best songs of our – or any other – era. His political commitment of this time is a bonus.

Today, on the anniversary of Lennon’s birth, we should take the opportunity to celebrate his life and mourn his death. But we should be singing much more than just the dirge “Imagine”.

The original version of this article appeared in German on the marx21 Website on October 9th, 2105, the 75th anniversary of John Lennon’s birth: 

From IWS to Liebig34: Solidarity!

This is a letter from International Women* Space (IWS). IWS was formed in December 2012 during the Refugee Movement’s occupation of the former Gerhart-Hauptmann School in Berlin-Kreuzberg. The letter concerns the planned eviction of the Liebig34 squat, which is planned for later this week. The eviction has been initiated by the “owner” of Liebig34, Gijora […]


07/10/2020


This is a letter from International Women* Space (IWS). IWS was formed in December 2012 during the Refugee Movement’s occupation of the former Gerhart-Hauptmann School in Berlin-Kreuzberg. The letter concerns the planned eviction of the Liebig34 squat, which is planned for later this week. The eviction has been initiated by the “owner” of Liebig34, Gijora Padovicz, who is believed to own at least 2000 houses in Berlin and who is known for the deliberate buyouts and destruction of house-projects.

Dear Companheiras and Companheirxs of Liebig34,

We, the International Women* Space, are very proud of you!

We see your struggle and we recognize ourselves in it!

In 2014, more than one thousand cops tried to evict us from the Gerhart-Hauptmann School on behalf of the racist capitalist system!

They didn’t succeed, they simply lost one million euros by trying to evict a movement!

We hope this will be the same in your case.

At the time we were surprised by our strength because we were not always this strong. But throughout the struggle we developed the strength to fight the capitalist patriarchy and its misogyny, classism and racism.

Padovicz embodies this patriarchal capitalism. He clearly hates the likes of us and only cares about money. Padovicz is a serious predator and should be treated as such but instead the state continues to protect his right to accumulate more millions. Once again, we see the state sending thousands of cops to defend a property that Padovicz has decided is his. Everything that this man represents and the complicity of the state in this process is disgraceful!

Companheirxs, the fight must continue and our struggle is historical!

Your house, our movement are a way out of this racist capitalist madness!!

We are angry! We are livid each time we see these power junkies that oppress us trying to stop people living self-determined lives!

Let’s transform our anger into energy and let’s not allow rich assholes to come and take our sense of belonging, our sense of identity and purpose! Because it’s not worth any amount of money. You can’t put a price tag on us!

The whole city should join this struggle and wreak civil disobedience. We should come together to protect not only the Liebig 34 house, but the idea of this space!

Whatever you do in the next few days, make sure you are making history and adding a new chapter to this rich feminist movement that has brought us so much since the moment women, queers, and trans folks decided to get together and fight back!

We stand in so much fucking solidarity with you!!!

International Women* Space

This article first appeared on the IWS Website. Reproduced with permission