The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

News from Berlin and Germany: 4th September 2021

Weekly news roundup from Berlin and Germany


03/09/2021

compiled by Ana Ferreira

 

NEWS FROM BERLIN

Neo-Nazis soon to stand trial

The two main suspects in the right-wing extremist attack series in Berlin-Neukölln are likely to stand trial soon. They have been charged by the public prosecutor’s office with aggravated arson, damage to property and threats. According to the indictment, the two men allegedly committed the arson attacks on the car of a bookseller and the car of a left-wing local politician on 1 February 2018. The accusation is based on several pieces of circumstantial evidence. The victims were quite active against right-wing extremism. Crimes like arson attacks on cars are very difficult to solve because there are often neither witnesses nor traces. Source: taz

SPD prefer concrete to the environment

Berlin’s building code – for two years, the Social Democrats, the Left Party and the Greens have been working on an amendment to the regulations. The new building code would present, for instance, greener roofs and facades. On Monday, however, the SPD representative Iris Spranger informed the Greens and the Left the talks were over. This means it is the end of the red-red-green coalition. Not only until election night, but beyond. Because the CDU and FDP seem to be better at the grey concrete. Now the gardens of grey seem to be back in vogue, thanks to Franziska Giffey. Source: taz

Socialisers under attack

The accusations of alleged sexual harassment against an activist of the initiative Deutsche Wohnen & Co Enteignen have now become public and the subsequent internal handling of the matter hold considerable explosive potential for the cause. While for some it is clear that in the case of allegations of sexual assault, the victim must first be fully believed, others consider it customary to first demand proof and also to let the alleged perpetrator describe his or her view of things. Two incompatible approaches. In this case, the feminist approach clearly prevailed. Source: nd

 

NEWS FROM GERMANY

Bundeswehr colonel leaves the AfD

Uwe Junge is leaving the party, citing its radicalisation as the reason. Among those radicals, he means the candidates for the Bundestag elections, Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla. But he himself is anything but moderate, having been side by side for instance with Pegida founder Lutz Bachmann, as well as many neo-Nazis at a demo in Chemnitz in September 2018. In the meantime, the first reactions have come from the AfD: candidate Tino Chrupalla wrote on Twitter: “I thank Mr Junge for his work in building up the party. All the best in your political retirement! Source: taz

GDL announces five-day passenger rail strike

The train drivers’ union GDL has announced new strikes in the wage dispute with Deutsche Bahn. The third strike within a few weeks will also be the longest so far in the current wage dispute. The strikes are to end on Tuesday next week at 02:00 in the morning. GDL leader Claus Weselsky said he was sorry for the rail passengers, but that the “unteachable railway board” was responsible. S-Bahn and regional services will also be likely “massively” affected. It is not yet clear to what extent these areas will also be affected by the third strike. Source: rbb

Mobile data in Germany costs more than the European average

The Federation of German Consumer Organisations has made a comparison of the costs of mobile data across Europe and found out internet is cheaper in not only countries like Estonia, Romania, and Poland, but also in neighbouring countries such as France and Italy. Just to compare, a gigabyte of mobile data cost an average of 3.35 euros in Germany in 2019, while in France it was something like 3.18 euros. In Poland, it cost the average of 0.83 euros. The Federation advocated measures against high costs. Source: iamexpat

#unteilbar

For a society of solidarity and justice

On September 4th the #unteilbar demo will take place in Berlin, three weeks ahead of the German elections. We will be taking to the streets in a stand against racism and in a show of solidarity for social justice.

#unteilbar started in Berlin but has become an important rallying point throughout Germany. We are organized into anti-racist groups, the hospital and care movement, tenant initiatives, human rights organizations, anti-fascist groups, trade unions, charitable organizations, feminist and queer groups, the anti-war and the climate movement. Our broad alliance includes more than 300 organizations which signed our call-to-action. In 2018 we went ahead with our first #unteilbar rally in Berlin and brought 242,000 people from diverse political backgrounds together.

Solidarity – now more than ever

Social problems and injustices have dramatically gotten more acute in the last year. More and more people live in poverty or fear losing their livelihoods. At the same time, the consequences of climate change are becoming more and more dangerous. While hatred and racism become more and more socially acceptable, people are dying every day on the EU’s borders.

Now is the time to take to take to the streets and show that we are #unteilbar #indivisble

  • We demand decent working and living conditions and demand that education, healthcare and housing not be left to the market!
  • The rich should pay for the pandemic and accompanying crisis!
  • We fight for an antiracist and inclusive society, that makes society fair for all genders, in which everyone can participate and that is there for everyone!
  • We insist on forceful action against the climate crisis and on worldwide just access to Covid-19 vaccines.
  • We are for the right to refuge and asylm—Human rights are #unteilbar #indivisible

Join up, get involved and share this information!

Support us with a donation!

www.unteilbar.org

mitmachen@unteilbar.org [Facebook, Twitter, Instagram]

Donations to: Digitalcourage e.V. | IBAN DE41 3702 0500 5459 5459 39 | BIC BFSWDE33XXX

 

 

ViSdP: Lukas Theune, Karl-Marx-Str. 172, 12043 Berlin

Afghan Refugees trapped on the Polish Eastern Border

European migration policies are putting vulnerable refugees in even more danger


02/09/2021

According to the Ocalenie Foundation, an organization which provides assistance to refugees, 32 refugees are trapped on the Polish border with Belarus, close to Usnarz Górny. They include women and a 15 year old girl.

The refugees can’t move forward and they can’t go back. They are trapped on the border surrounded by the Polish military on one side, and Belarusian soldiers on the other. The standoff has been going on for about 20 days already, and they say that they have no water or food. Images show them soaked by the rain and freezing. One of the women is complaining about difficulties breathing and pain in the kidneys. Her condition is critical. It is not exactly clear what’s wrong with her, because no medical workers are present. There has been no help, either from the Polish side or from Belarus.

The Ocalenie Foundation also reports that the health of other refugees is also deteriorating: 25 people are ill, 12 of them seriously. Yet potential help is just a few hundred metres away. For weeks activists have been trying to organize support and to provide food, water and necessities to the group of trapped refugees, but the border guards are actively preventing contact. Belarusian authorities have closed the country’s borders to prevent the refugees from returning. Poland is arguing that the refugees are currently on Belarusian territory, meaning they should apply for asylum in that country.

The situation all over the Eastern EU-border is tense and inhumane. According to activists’ reports, illegal push-backs from Poland to Belarus are happening on a regular basis. These are the actions of state services which prevent migrants from applying for international protection by forcing them to return to Belarus after crossing the Polish border, even when they declare their will for protection. The actions of the border guards are violating both human rights and the Polish Constitution and are exposing refugees to unnecessary danger.

The violations by the Polish border guards, who are commissioned by the Defence Ministry, have caused great indignation in Poland. Protests demanding that the refugees are welcome have taken place all over the country and are supported by the left parties. Demonstrators hold posters and banners with slogans saying: “Border of Shame”, “Enough cruelty!”, “Enough of the policy of torture and humiliation!”, “No human is illegal”, “We do not want Polish borders of death”, “Decency is more important than order”, “Accept Refugees, kick out the Nazis.”

There are fundraising campaigns to help collect food, water, clothes, tents, sleeping bags, and money for legal aid. The MEP of the left party Razem, Maciej Konieczny, was admitted by the border guard to meet the group of refugees. He managed to hand over sleeping bags and powers of attorney for legal representation in Poland.  Grzegorz Pietruczuk, the only left-wing mayor of a district (Bielany in Warsaw) offered to provide housing for Afghan families after they are allowed to enter Poland.

Fortress Europe and “Migration Diplomacy” 

This group of Afghan refugees is not an isolated case. Soon after they arrived, information reached the public about nine Somalian women trapped on the Polish-Belarus border near the village of Bobrówka. Many groups of migrants, including women and children, have arrived at the Polish border to the West of Belarus and at the Latvian and Lithuanian borders to the North. While some of them are Belarusians seeking refuge from Lukashenko’s regime, many more are Middle Eastern refugees – mostly Iranians, Afghanis, Syrians, Kurds, and members of the Yazidi minority in Iraq. They’re hoping to ultimately reach the EU.

The governments of Lithuania, Latvia, and Poland are interpreting the increase in migrants reaching their territory as a threat to their national security. Speaking to the Financial Times, the Lithuanian president, Gitanas Nauseda, accused the Belarusian authorities of engaging in a “hybrid attack against Europe” by offering package travel deals via the state-run tourist agency Tsentrkurort.

On Monday 23rd August at a press briefing near the Belarus frontier, Polish defence minister Mariusz Blaszczak said “we are dealing with an attack on Poland. It is an attempt to trigger a migration crisis”. Many commentators see the reason for the current escalation at the Belarusian borders as an effect of sanctions which the EU imposed on Belarus last year. It is also an impact of the politics of its neighboring countries, especially Latvia and Poland, who present themselves as allies of the Belarusian opposition and take in people fleeing Lukashenko’s regime.

The kind of “migration diplomacy” implemented by Lukashenko is nothing new. A similar situation occurred in the aftermath of 2015 when the Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan adopted a more aggressive stance toward the European Union. Erdoğan threatened to flood Europe with migrants if European Union leaders did not offer him a better deal to keep refugees in Turkey.

In May 2021, Morocco froze a deal with the European Union about managing  migration to the Spanish exclave, Ceuta. The reason was Spain’s decision to offer medical treatment to Brahim Ghali, the leader of the Frente Polisario, a political organisation claiming liberation for West Sahara from Moroccan occupation. Fearing a new refugee influx, Poland is increasing its security measures on the border with Belarus by building a 2.5m high wall, similar to the one built by Hungary on its border with Serbia in 2015, and Lithuanian soldiers are installing razor wire on the border with Belarus. Turkey and Greece are both installing walls and surveillance systems to prevent asylum seekers from Afghanistan from reaching Europe.

It’s a disturbing state of affairs considering the various reports pointing out that increased border security leads directly to violence against refugees. It puts them at risk of returning to unsafe countries and leads to a disturbing rise in avoidable deaths, as countries close off certain migration routes, forcing migrants to look for other, often more dangerous, alternatives. This is a fatal sign of a failure of European migration policy. EU politics are leading to migrants being detained and subjected to gross human rights violations in transit countries in Eastern Europe, the Balkans, West Asia and Africa.

The argument propagated by the right-wing and liberal media saying that letting migrants in would favor Lukashenko and Putin is dehumanizing and acts as a cover for the real reasons why people decide to leave their homes. It is also is the main reason for the polarisation and destabilization of society. The Polish authorities are running a heated campaign using the state-owned media, presenting refugees as a threat to health, security, and stability. This has been accompanied by right wing politicians declaring the need to “protect the Polish family and guarantee security for the nation from possible terrorist attacks”. This form of fear management policy was previously used by politicians in 2015. The racist rhetoric turned out to be successful: in May 2015 72% of Poles were in favor of letting refugees in, in October 2015 – after a massive hate campaign – the support sank to 21%.

European countries have adopted policies of outsourcing migration outside of the EU to keep migrants out of their own territory at all costs. The securitisation of the EU’s asylum and immigration regime is currently funded by billions of Euros. The idea that a hard external border is important has been imposed into the European economic integration project and serves to construct refugees as the dangerous Other.

Capitalism needs borders in order to maintain its system of wealth accumulation through maximum exploitation. The borders of the European Union are entangled with global postcolonial politics of race and the global neoliberal politics of labour mobility and subordination that produce and capitalise upon these racialized differences. Poland’s policy of marginalisation and exclusion of racialized non-Europeans aims at stabilising the internal economical order. Thus capitalist territorial imaginations remain central to the European project.

Eastern European Route

The human rights violations happening at the Eastern border of the European Union aren’t new. Since 2016, activists and human rights organisations have been reporting cases of regular disregard of EU- and international law for people trying to apply for international protection at the Terespol/Brześć.

People have been camped for weeks on the train platform on the Belarusian side of the Polish border sometimes, trying to cross. The Polish Border Guards arbitrarily refused passage to refugees, mainly from Chechnya, Ukraine and Tajikistan. According to many reports, the vast majority who tried to pass at official border crossing points were returned immediately and refused the right to seek asylum. Officers refused to submit an application for international protection. The main reasons for the refusal  were the lack of valid travel documents and a claim that those people were  “economic migrants”.

In 2020, the European Court of Human Rights decided that Poland has ignored applications for asylum submitted by newcomers to the Border Guard officers, and violated several articles of the European Convention on Human Rights (including the order to protect against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment). There have been cases reported which expose the inhumane treatment of migrants by the Polish and Belarusian border authorities including sending back Chechen refugees to Russia and violent treatment by armed border guards.

The European Commission has maintained cooperation with Belarus since 2016, and supports it financially in the construction and/or renovation of detention centres. While the EU is sanctioning Belarus and refusing to recognize Lukashenko as the lawful president, the cooperation on migration continues. Once again, this shows the hypocrisy of the  European Union’s border regime: it presents itself as a protector of fundamental rights while equipping regimes violating those rights.

Although European nations may have formally rejected their colonial past, there is still a deeply uneven and imperialist power balance between Europe and countries of the Global South. Western powers are unable to face the consequences of leading and/or participating in the imperialist war in Afghanistan, including an inability to rescue people and establishing safe escape routes. This clearly shows the brutal failure of Western interventionism and the idea of “peace and state building” which is based on domination-submission dynamics which aim to maintain the peripheral status of the region in global capitalism.

It is time to take responsibility and face the consequences of years of intended destabilization and exploitation in the region. Countries on the outskirts of the European Union need to follow international law instead of breaking it. People seeking asylum must be let into the European Union while their cases are handled. This is the minimum that must be guaranteed under the current conditions.

The Left should go even further and demand opening the borders and freedom of movement as a fundamental right. We must  criticize the European asylum system and migration law, as part of global migration management, which creates and reproduces inequality and secures Europe’s position in global capitalism through restrictions on immigration. The function of such restrictions is on the one hand to maintain a high competition between workers, so that they agree to  work for less, and on the other to keep the undocumented migrants down, so they can be even more easily exploited and intimidated with the threat of deportation. More restrictions will never stop migration.

The economic needs of workers struggling to make ends meet will force them to cross borders, no matter what the risk is. Borders exist almost exclusively for the world’s working classes. Fortress Europe is becoming more and more militarized, as European powers fear the uncontrolled migration from the Global South. While there are very few legal routes for migrants in the global context, for the world’s billionaires and their capital it is quite the opposite. Their capital can flow under the almost borderless globalized economy.

In The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels declared that “the working men have no country” which means that national divisions are just another obstacle preventing the working class from realising their common interests. A common struggle for freedom of movement is an essential part of international working class solidarity and a basis to build networks of resistance.

 

Gallery 1: more photos from the Poland-Belarus border

On the border with Belarus
Doctor being prevented from reaching the Afghan refugees
One of the 32 Afghan refugees stuck on the border
“Pushback” of refugees over the border to Belarus. Photo: Mikołaj Kiembłowski
“Pushback” of refugees over the border to Belarus. Photo: Mikołaj Kiembłowski
Photo: Mikołaj Kiembłowski
Photo: Mikołaj Kiembłowski

Gallery 2 – photos of the protests in Poland (first picture – 2nd day of protest in Wrocław (01.09.2021). Others taken from the Pracownicza Demokracja facebook page. Reproduced with permission)

“Domestic violence is a global problem”

Interview with the director of a new award-winning documentary


01/09/2021

Interview with Chloe Fairweather (CF), director of the film Dying to Divorce, which has just been nominated for a Prix Europa award and will be showing in Berlin on Friday

 

Can you start by introducing yourself

CF: Hi I am Chloe Fairweather – the director of Dying  to Divorce.

Why did you make Dying to Divorce?

CF: I was in Turkey working on different short films to go with feature articles with journalist Christina Asquith. We were actually working on something completely different when she had heard about the work of the ‘We Will Stop Femicide Platform’, and we decided to work up a story completely on spec. I filmed the activist from ‘We will stop femicide’, Aysen, meeting Arzu. Arzu’s legs and arms had been shot at close range, when she tried to leave her husband. I remember we were both so shocked by the level of the violence, we felt a real urgency to get the story out there. Arzu was so keen to tell her story, that it really drove me to work on this film.  I started talking to the Producer Sinead Kirwan and we both felt that although this was about Turkey, the story of women standing up for themselves was universal.

Sinead has said elsewhere that you started hoping that you could change the law, but came across too many obstacles in Turkish society. How have people in Turkey reacted to your film?

CF: We have had an overwhelmingly positive response to the film in Turkey. Due to censorship it has not been widely seen yet but Turkish audiences tell us they think its really important because it is the first real record of all the events of the past 5 years in one narrative. Things have changed so much since the attempted coup that the Turkish audience really appreciates the opportunity to actually reflect on that change.

Do you think that domestic violence is a specific Turkish or Muslim problem?

CF: No. Domestic violence is a global problem. We have had to do a lot of research into femicide and it’s shocking how high the levels are all over the world. Things are bad in Turkey but unfortunately not unique. We also don’t think that religion is the reason – sometimes it is the excuse but the religion used changes from country to country, so it’s not a Muslim problem, otherwise how could explain levels of violence in Russia or even the US.

What seems to more of the common denominator is the existence of opportunistic politicians who refuse to condemn violence against women, and attack those who are protesting this violence.

Do you think that there has been a rise of domestic violence since Erdogan came to power?

CF: According to We Will Stop Femicides there has certainly been a rise in femicides in the last few years. It is difficult to say the two are directly related. But it is true that the number of women being killed even since 2015 has risen sharply.

How has Covid affected women trapped in abusive relationships?

CF: Covid has negatively affected women all over the world at risk of abuse. Abuse thrives on isolation and during Covid support was not very easy to access. In Turkey there has been the double blow of Turkey withdrawing support for the Istanbul convention.

This year, Chlöé Zhao became only the second woman to ever win the Best Director Oscar and a few directors like Céline Sciamma are finally starting to gain critical acclaim. Are things improving for women in film, and how far do we still have to go?

CF: Things are improving but there is still a long way to go in terms of removing the structural barriers for women filmmakers. There are many assumptions made about a female director and male directors are often seen as a ‘safe’ pair of hands. On top of that, women face the burden of dealing with expensive childcare so often need to be out of the workplace longer. But I think there are some positive things evolving. Documentaries seem to be much better then dramas, but there is still definitely not equality.

Do you have any future projects planned? What do you intend to do next?

We have a couple of exciting projects in the pipeline that look at female resistance and resilience, but at the moment we are concentrating on releasing Dying to Divorce.

From November 25th to 10th December it is the UN 16 Days of Activism to Stop Gender Violence. We want to organise as many community, festival, and cinema screenings of Dying to Divorce across the world during this period.

 

Dying to Divorce will be screened in Berlin this Friday (3rd September) as part of the Human Rights Film Festival. Doors open at 7.30pm, the film starts at 8.45pm.