The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Letter from the Editors, 12th October 2023

Hello everyone, This week, some people will be celebrating Columbus Day. But there is nothing to celebrate! Since the genocide by the Spanish occupation of Abya Yala, official history from 1492 until today is written with the blood of Native peoples all over the world. Colonialism never ended – it continues to generate death and […]


12/10/2023


Hello everyone,

This week, some people will be celebrating Columbus Day. But there is nothing to celebrate! Since the genocide by the Spanish occupation of Abya Yala, official history from 1492 until today is written with the blood of Native peoples all over the world. Colonialism never ended – it continues to generate death and exploitation, imposing a falsely „civilising“ model of economic and cultural „development“, embodied in the extractivist structure of global racial capitalism. For this reason, Initiative 1210 Anti-Colonial and El Sur Resiste are organising a Global Day of Action against Neocolonialism. The demonstration takes place today (Thursday) at 4pm at the Auswärtiges Amt and will be going to the Humboldt Forum. El Sur Resiste (The South Resists) are our Campaign of the Week.

For more on the subject, La Jaima de Tiris and the Sahrawi Diaspora in Germany are organising a Protest Rally to show their rejection of Spanish colonialism (whose last territory not being decolonized is #WesternSahara) and in favour of the right to self-determination of the Sahrawi people. The rally organisers also support all the actions called within the framework of the #worlddayofactionagainstneocolonialism #globaleraktiontaggegenneokolonialismus organized in Berlin by @blackearthkollektiv Join up! The rally will take place on Thursday in front of the Spanish Embassy, Lichtensteinallee 1 from 5pm.

Also this evening, Bernie Sanders will be promoting his new book It’s ok to be mad at capitalism. The book is an impressive witness to his political life’s work and a fighting appeal to the next generation to question the hyper-capitalist system. Sanders’ vision goes way beyond the demand of his electoral campaign. He shows that economic rights must be recognised as human rights, so we can fight growing inequality. He encourages his readers to fight for a society which offers a reasonable standard of living for all. The meeting, in the Haus der Kulturen der Welt, has been long sold out, but you can watch via live stream on Thursday evening here.

On Friday and Saturday, in the main ver.di building, the Berlin Tech Workers Coalition will host Tech Conference 2023 – the largest English speaking and tech worker-led conference in Germany. Friday, 13 October is open for all Works Council members. As a Works Council training, you can do this training during working hours, and conference fee is paid by your employer. Registration is mandatory. Find further instructions here. Email us conference@techworkersberlin.com if you have questions! Saturday, 14 October is free of cost and open for all tech workers. It will have both a broader focus on social movements, trade union organising and political education.

On Saturday, the LINKE Berlin Internationals and Right2TheCity, the English-language section of Deutsche Wohnen & Co Enteignen (DWE), are combining to offer Eine Küche für alle – a fundraising event for the new DWE referendum to expropriate the big landlords. With spoken word performances, music, screen printing and food, there will be activities throughout the day. Let’s hang out, eat yummy food and trash on corporate landlords. Join us in Bilgisaray, Oranienstraße 45, from 4pm!

The programme looks like this:

16:00: Dumpling making workshop / Screen printing

18:00: Dinner!

19:00 Spoken word and comedy with:

  • Jacinta Nandi
  • Trevor

20:00: Short campaign announcement/break from activities/more room to socialise

20:30 Music with:

  • Nicolás Miquea
  • Nümmes
  • Franca

All money raised will go to the @dw_enteignen crowdfunding campaign to take back Berlin through a legally binding referendum ✊🏼

And on Sunday, it’s the latest LINKE Internationals walking tour – 1968 in West Berlin. As the year 1968 began, young people in West Berlin went wild. They began demonstrating against the imperialist war in Vietnam, against authoritarian structures at the universities, and against a “Federal Republic” run by former Nazis. All of West Berlin society opposed these “long-haired hooligans.” But this only radicalized them further.  1968 changed Berlin, Germany, and the world. The tour starts at 2pm in front of the Amerika-Haus, Hardenbergstraße 22-24. Follow the link to register, and receive more information on Saturday.

There are many more activities this week in Berlin, which are listed on our Events page. You can also see a shorter, but more detailed list of events which we are directly involved in here.

In News from Berlin, 5,000 right wingers demonstrate on Reunification Day, and teaching union plans strikes for smaller classes.

In News from Germany, no evidence to back up AfD leader’s claim that he was attacked, Bavarian politicians try to prevent the legalisation of cannabis, AfD makes big gains in elections in the West while die LINKE suffers significant losses, the CSU win in Bavaria but with their worst ever result, and 60 LINKE members call for the expulsion of Sahra Wagenknecht.

Read all about it in this week’s News from Berlin and Germany.

New this week on theleftberlin, Nathaniel Flakin looks at the chances of Berlin’s new housing referendum, As we will be working with Nathaniel and neues Deutschland to republish his Red Flag column, we talked to him about the column. There are responses to the latest events in Gaza by the Feminist Bloc | Palestine Speaks and the marx21 editorial board, and we interview Julia Schreiber about her work talking to Palestine activists in Germany.

You can follow us on the following social media:

If you would like to contribute any articles or have any questions or criticisms about our work, please contact us at team@theleftberlin.com. And please do encourage your friends to subscribe to this Newsletter.

Keep on fighting,

The Left Berlin Editorial Board

El Sur Resiste

Global Action on October 12, 2023


11/10/2023

More than two thousand years ago, the war between empires for the acquisition of land, natural resources, and geostrategic trade sites was based on the conquest of territories and the creation of borders. This was always done at the expense of the destruction of cultures and the blood of indigenous peoples.

This history of genocide and plunder, has Europe at its centre, seeking to expand itself to Africa, Asia, and Oceania. Thanks to this massive plundering, the great economic and political powers emerged. They started to compete for power and hegemony in a world under construction, for its borders and trade routes.

This ambition would finance campaigns of “exploration” to all corners of the planet. One of them took place more than 500 years ago, with “the discovery of America, the clash of worlds”. This history was written by the victors, with the blood of millions of murdered indigenous people and the ethnocide of millenary cultures.

At this point in time, the plundering and looting became global, and the main commercial routes of the great capitals were established. This, together with the advance of industry and technology, made historical developments more and more violent, happening simultaneously everywhere in the world.

Here and now, when we talk about NEOCOLONIZATION, we reflect beyond the theory, discourses, and historical debt of the GLOBAL NORTH (these are issues that we must continue to work on individually and collectively). To speak of NEOCOLONIZATION is to speak of the threats and violence happening to all corners of the GLOBAL SOUTH and to MOTHER NATURE. These are destroying our PRESENT and threatening the FUTURE of all of us.

However, this is also a history of resistance. We are the insurrections against pharaohs and kings, we are the revolts against landowners and rulers, we are the guerrillas, the independences, the revolutions, the strikes, the occupations, the recovery of lands, and of course we are also Organization and Autonomy, Cultures and Traditions, Alliances, Networks and Articulations, we are our Ancestries and Territories. We are equal because we are different and among so many differences, there are more things that unite us, than those that divide us.

In order not to forget, to remember, to unite in the face of so much adversity, WE CALL on the Peoples, Communities, Organizations, Collectives, Cooperatives, and all expressions of social movements relating to Indigenous, Peasant, Popular, Anarchist, Feminist, Environmentalist, Human Rights Defenders, Free Media and other struggles, to organize and carry out actions on October 12 in a decentralized, organized and coordinated manner.

  • We demand the end of the dispossession, plunder and destruction of nature and territories by big global capital and corporate states!
  • Stop racism, fascism and imposition of new military and industrial borders, migration is not a crime!
  • Stop violence and repression against social movements, organizations, communities, and peoples defending nature, the future and life itself on the planet!
  • Stop the war of extermination against the ZAPATIST, Kurdish, PALESTINIAN peoples and all the peoples of the GLOBAL SOUTH, who struggle and resist for a dignified human life!
  • Enough of trans-feminicide violence, respect for diversity and gender dissidence!
  • We demand Truth and Justice for those who were disappeared and murdered!
  • Freedom for political prisoners!
  • For housing and a dignified life, stop gentrification and predatory tourism!
  • If they touch one of us, they touch us all!
  • For an anti-patriarchal, anti-capitalist, anti-colonial, anti-racist, anti-racist and anti-imperialist struggle, another system is possible!

THE SOUTH RESISTS! in every corner of the GLOBAL SOUTH!

We call you to stay tuned for information and future communications through the website www.elsurresiste.org.

News from Berlin and Germany, 11th October 2023

Weekly news round-up from Berlin and Germany

NEWS FROM BERLIN

Right-wing demonstration in Berlin on German Unity Day

On October 3rd around 5,000 right-wingers and Alternative for Germany (AfD) supporters gathered on Museum Island for a protest which was seemingly in favour of “Transparent Political Dialogue.” However, according to Taz, some participants openly declared their hostility towards the reunified Germany, chanting “East East East Germany”. Police presence at the event was minimal. A police spokesperson did confirm that arguments between the demonstrators and passers-by took place. Around 50 individuals from the left-wing group “Omas gegen Rechts” had a counter-protest nearby. Source: exberliner

GEW calls for three-day warning strike

The Berlin Education and Science Union (GEW) has called for a teachers’ warning strike, from next Tuesday to Thursday. The union wants smaller classes in schools. Currently, up to 29 children learn in a primary school class, and up to 35 in secondary schools. For teachers, this means grading piles of class tests, writing more reports, and having many discussions with parents. The Berlin education administration and the financial administration call the strike irresponsible, asking the union to suspend it since the Senate is already using possibilities to improve the staff situation at schools. Source: rbb24

NEWS FROM GERMANY

‘No evidence’ of attack on AfD leader Chrupalla

German prosecutors and police issued a statement last Thursday there was “no evidence” to suggest there was an attack on Alternative for Germany (AfD) co-leader Tino Chrupalla. According to the statement, Chrupalla had been taking selfies with several people at an event, when contact with others was involved. He was found to have “a surface-level redness on his arm as well as swelling.” The AfD earlier said Chrupalla was involved in a ‘violent incident’ but police said there’s no evidence of an attack. The incident came before the key state elections in Bavaria and Hesse. Source: dw

Bavaria and the draft law for legalising cannabis

Cannabis is likely to be legalised in Germany in 2024, but politicians in Bavaria are planning to limit its availability. Last week, the Bavarian Health Minister, Klaus Holetschek, announced that the local government would set up a “central cannabis control unit” once legalisation has been enshrined. Considering procedures, the draft law is expected to return to the Bundestag for tweaks before being read by the Bundesrat. According to Holetscheck, the government in Bavaria plans to “submit a motion to reject the bill” in the Länderkammer. However, Karl Lauterbach (SPD) said such action will not stop that law since it does not require the approval of that chamber. Source: iamexpat

AfD achieves record results

Beaming broadly, AfD leader Alice Weidel roared into the microphone amid applause. “We are on the right track!” she shouted at the election party, once again underlining the course of fundamental opposition. Meanwhile, the first projections of the state elections in Bavaria and Hesse caused shockwaves nationwide. In its soaring popularity, the AfD benefited from a strong focus of the public debate on migration and from other right-wing populist campaigns, especially in Bavaria with a lot of populist competition from Markus Söder (CSU) and Hubert Aiwanger (Free Voters). The AfD instrumentalises fears of social decline and provides racist answers to social distribution efforts. Source: taz

Hesse and Bavaria: The Left departs into the unknown

If one thing can be said about the elections in Bavaria and in Hesse, it is that federal policy issues were the determining factor. Together with the fact that CDU/CSU has shown a populist pose – whether done by Markus Söder or Friedrich Merz. And the Free Voters owe their success to the people who cheer for a reactionary and self-righteous beer tent speaker. Considering such scenarios, the most delicate point comes from the Left Party, which struggles for its existence in Hesse. What is being witnessed is a farewell in chapters into the unknown. Source: nd-aktuell

Self-made defeat

The CSU in Bavaria and the CDU in Hesse won the state elections with comfortable margins, and the incumbent minister-presidents Markus Söder and Boris Rhein can look forward to another term in office, although, in Söder’s case, with the worst CSU result ever. In contrast, the SPD, the Greens, and the FDP, who govern together in the federal government, are experiencing a double defeat. In Hesse, where the SPD announced a change of government with aplomb in the spring, it clearly chose the wrong candidate: Nancy Faeser could not separate herself from the office of Federal Minister of the Interior. Source: taz

Around 60 members of the Left call for Wagenknecht’s expulsion

Almost 60 party members of the Left Party have filed a motion for the expulsion of Sahra Wagenknecht from the party. The reason is that Wagenknecht has been hinting at founding a new party for several months. In the motion, she is accused of “particularly damaging and disloyal behaviour” towards the Left Party. However, excluding Wagenknecht from the party could jeopardise the Left’s parliamentary group status in the Bundestag. In the 2021 Bundestag elections, the party fell short of the five-percent hurdle but was able to enter parliament thanks to winning three direct mandates, two of them in Berlin. Source: rbb24

Escalation in Palestine: Break out of the Open Air Prison – End the Occupation and the Blockade

Violence in Palestine is escalating again. Who is to blame and how should the Left react in this situation?


10/10/2023

After Israel’s extreme right wing government organised a wave of violence against Palestinians in recent months, Hamas struck back with an unexpected counter-attack. In a secretly planned operation, fighters from Gaza broke out of the coastal strip which has been hermetically sealed for the last 16 years, and attacked both military and civil targets on Israeli territory.

According to the Israeli government, the number of dead has risen to more than 700. At least 2,200 people were injured, and at least 100 were captured by Hamas fighters.

State of War in Israel

The Israeli government has proclaimed a state of war, and continuously bombed both military and civil targets in Gaza. The Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant announced a “total blockade”, including a ban on the import of food and fuel. He described this as part of a war against “brutish people”.

According to the army, so far 800 targets in the Gaza strip have been bombed. Palestinians report that more than 500 people have been killed, and several thousand injured. For example, Israeli forces bombed an eleven story building in the Al-Nasr district in the West of Gaza City. In Khan Younis in the Gaza strip, a mosque was hit by fire and largely destroyed. Electricity has been turned off for the whole enclave with around two million inhabitants.

Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu called all surviving civilians in Gaza to leave the area. But because of the blockade there are virtually no possibilities to flee. At the same time, the Israeli government is sending 300,000 reservists to the Gaza strip.

Who is to blame?

Even Ofer Cassif, member of the liberal Hadash party and the Israeli senate has said that the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory and the actions of the government led by Netanyahu are responsible for the death of Israelis and Palestinians. Speaking to Al-Jazeera, he said “It [the casualties] is unacceptable … As long as the occupation remains, this terrible crime will continue … and this is what this government wants.

According to UN figures, between 2008 and 2023 (not counting the victims of recent days), Israeli attacks on the Gaza strip have killed 6,407 Palestinians and wounded 152,560. On the Israeli side, 308 people have been killed in the same period and 6,307 wounded.

The Israeli Government Escalates

Since the formation of the extreme right wing government in Israel, settlers have become even more radicalised. Armed settlers regularly enter Palestinian villages in the West Bank and attack the inhabitants. In this sense, these people are no longer civilians, but armed colonisers and conquistadors.

According to UN reports, this violence of Jewish settlers against Palestinians has risen massively. With around 99 cases per month, there have been 39 per cent more attacks in 2023 compared to the previous year. The actions of the settlers have the backing of the Israeli government and the army leadership, who support their actions.

Only recently, Israeli soldiers also entered the Palestinian village of Ja’bad, attacked Palestinian villagers and shot tear gas into the streets. Every day, houses are destroyed by Israeli forces, olive groves are flattened, and the livelihood of the Palestinians are increasingly taken away.

Gaza: The Largest Open Air Prison in the World

Life in the Gaza strip where land, water, air and even the underground are fully sealed off by Israel is inhumane, even though this is not recognised by the media and the international public. Over 97 per cent of the water in the sealed-off coastal strip is unfit for human consumption.

Power is often only available for 2-4 hours per day. Even the average daily food consumption is limited by Israel to 2279 calories per day. Recently even former generals and Mossad agents have admitted that their actions in Palestine amount to war crimes.

The Hamas Offensive

Israel offered an open flank for the offensive from Gaza because of the deeply broken political environment in the midst of mass protests against the extreme right wing government coalition. In addition, there is the crisis of the occupation architecture in the West Bank which was established by the “Oslo negotiation process”. As the Palestinian Authority acts as the extended arm of the occupation as part of its “security cooperation” with Israel, it is increasingly losing its support from the general public.

In cities like Nablus and Jenin, formerly disbanded PLO militias are reaching once more for their weapons in newly formed military formations together with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Gaza seemed to be forgotten for months. Now Hamas is using the situation for an offensive.

Reaction of the Media and Politicians

The reaction of the media and politicians in Germany is one-sided and aimed against the Palestinian liberation movement. Although the attack by Hamas and Palestinian fighters was described as “barbarism”, “terror”, and “unacceptable”, this is exactly the everyday experience of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank under Israeli occupation.

It would be a mistake for the Left to follow these politics of our rulers. The delegitimisation of the Palestinian resistance finds its expression in the attacks on Palestine solidarity in Germany: fundamental rights like the right to assembly, freedom of association or speech, and job opportunities are restricted by the repression.

In this context, Micha Brumlik, the educationalist and Senior Advisor to the Centre of Jewish Studies in Berlin-Brandenburg spoke of a “new McCarthyism” (see our FAQ “The Left and Palestine Solidarity”).

Palestine and the Hypocrisy of our Rulers

As usual, US President Joe Biden and the German Chancellor Scholz have stood on the side of the occupying force. Scholz spoke of the Israeli government’s right “to defend itself”. The hypocrisy of our rulers is clear. They deplore Putin’s annexation of Eastern Ukraine, but support the annexation of East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Golan Heights with weapons.

They call the Palestinian resistance fighters against the colonial occupying force “terrorists” and are silent about the everyday terror of the Israeli settlers and the Israeli army in the West Bank and in East Jerusalem.

Right to Resist in Palestine

The Palestinians have every right to defend themselves against their oppression. But now the oppression and the resistance to it are resulting in fatalities. Each one of these fatalities is one to many. At the same time, every fatality, the suffering and the brutality is also the result of decades of racist ethnic cleansing and the Israeli State’s occupation of Palestine.

Responsibility for the occupation and oppression of the Palestinian civilian population lies with the Israeli state machinery, its organs of violence and the settler movement. Death, violence and degradation is part of the everyday life of Palestinians under Apartheid.

Mohammed Salah from the Beit Lahia district in the North of the Gaza strip told Al-Jazeera about the bombing by the Israeli army: “Last night Israeli planes indiscriminately bombed our district. The situation was very dangerous. Like other families, I have lost my house.”

He continued: “The Israeli bombs do not distinguish between civilians and resistance fighters. In every war we lose our houses because of the random bombing. We have been living in this situation for years, without anyone defending us or standing up for us. We have the right to defend ourselves against our occupiers.”

How can the Violence in Palestine be Ended?

Without the Israeli State’s brutal displacement politics against the Palestinians there would be no need to resist. In Israel, military service is compulsory from the age of 17 for all non-Arab citizens. This means that people are militarily trained as combatants or reservists in the framework of the occupation of Palestine. This practice is an elementary integral part of the settler colonial state.

The solution would be a joint democratic state with the lifting of checkpoints, the pulling down of walls and fences, the opening of the Zionist settlements and streets in the West Bank along which everyone is allowed to travel. The spiral of violence will only be permanently broken if the roots of the problem are addressed by ending the occupation and granting the same rights to Palestinians as the Jewish population.

It is therefore decisive what echo the Palestinian fight finds in surrounding countries and worldwide.

Reaction of the Left

Solidarity with the Palestinian liberation movement must urgently be put on the agenda of the international Left, including the Left in Germany. The German Left is strong at building anti-racist protests, as mobilisations like #unteilbar, Seebrücke and other initiatives clearly show. But much of German civil society, including the Left, is silent when it comes to solidarity with the Palestinians. This is related to uncertainty in the fact of accusations of antisemitism.

Solidarity with Palestine

It is the role of the Left (and of the party Die LINKE) to change this now and in the coming years. Left wing organisations and parties in Germany can seek out joint work with organisations like Palästina Spricht, Samidoun, or the Jüdische Stimme für gerechten Frieden in Nahost (Jewish Voice for a Just Peace in the Middle East) and plan joint meetings and protests which would help to develop a position which is not on the side of the oppressor, and to take it onto the streets.

The occupation and blockade must be ended.

Solidarity demonstration with Palestinians – Wednesday 11th October, 4pm, Richardplatz Berlin. Called by the Palestine Campaign and the Palestinian community.

This article, written by the marx21 editorial board, first appeared in German on the marx21 website. The article appeared on 9th October, so some of the figures quoted may now be even higher. Translation: Phil Butland. Reproduced with permission.

Risky Allyship: Germans in Support of Palestine

Interview with Julia Schreiber about people in Germany who are fighting for Palestinian rights


09/10/2023

Thanks for talking to us. Could you start by briefly introducing yourself?

I’m Julia. I’m originally from Germany, but I moved to the UK a year ago to do a PhD on risky allyship – why people advocate the rights of another group although it might be risky for them and they don’t gain any direct benefits from their activism – indeed, it may even harm them.

Within this project, I’m looking at different groups. And because I’m German, I’m interested in why Germans actively support Palestinians although this can be really hard in Germany and you can be accused of antisemitism as soon as you criticize Israel or say something pro-Palestinian.

In Germany, it’s really hard to find a perspective other than a really pro-Israel narrative.

Why are you specifically interested in Israel and Palestine?

When you grow up in Germany, you hear about the Holocaust a lot in school. You hear much less about the Israel-Palestine conflict apart from media reports about escalations between Israelis and Palestinians without further knowledge of the background of this conflict, and Israel defending themselves against Palestinians.

This meant that when I was a kid I didn’t think much about the conflict. If I thought about it at all, it was as a conflict between two religions. Then I got to know an American Jewish person who had recently moved to Israel. I visited him there, and I heard a lot of the Israeli narrative. I saw soldiers everywhere and how the tension and fear affected people’s daily life. I only heard about this from the Israeli side, but I now felt a personal connection.

Over the years, I became more and more interested in being active for peacebuilding efforts. I did a training to become a peace worker. And the more I learned about the conflict, the more I heard also about the “other” side, the Palestinian side. I also saw how little I knew about how the conflict actually evolved because there is not much discourse about this in German society. I realized that in conflicts such as in Israel and Palestine, it is not enough to just foster positive relations between the groups – the power inequalities and injustices also have to be addressed for sustainable peace efforts.

You’ve lived in Germany and in Britain. What differences have you noticed about how Palestine is discussed?

While I was still in Germany, I saw a lot on social media about Palestinians‘ experiences. I found these emotionally touching. But I didn’t really have people to talk to about it.

Then I moved to the UK. In my project I originally wanted to look at Israelis who support Palestinian rights – people who are part of the conflict, and then step in for the other group and try to empower them, because I imagine it to be very challenging in these contexts to support an oppressed group and as soon as the risk is higher to be an ally, not many people engage in allyship actions. But at some point, I realized how hard it is in Germany to step in for Palestinians – and that it can also be risky there.

When I moved to the UK, I realized how much easier it was to talk openly about the subject. I learned much more about topics like settler colonialism, which were new to me, as they aren’t really addressed in Germany. For me, the German context meant that you always had the fear of saying something wrong about the conflict and not having open discussions about the injustices that are happening there, because of being seen as being antisemitic.

As I’ve been working in academia, I’ve been in a bit of a bubble. In German academia, this is almost a topic that is not covered or talked about, even among more liberal people who are used to talking about inequalities. I would say most research on this conflict focusses on how to create harmony between the groups. I remember one researcher who looked into the differences between criticizing Israel and antisemitism facing a lot of accusations of being antisemitic. This is not the same in the UK, at least for the people I talk to.

Why do you think Germans should feel particularly bad about antisemitism?

From my memory, we spent at least four years at school just talking about World War II and the awful things that we did. I think this is very important to make sure that what has happened will never happen again. My friends and I grew up being taught this guilt towards Jewish people, and feeling bad about our history and what our ancestors did. Overall, I think this makes us feel that we have a higher responsibility compared to other countries to protect Jewish life.

At the same time, there are not that many Jewish people in Germany anymore. Many German people I know say that they’ve never met a Jewish person personally, or at least no-one that they knew was Jewish. So it makes it harder for people to know how to interact with Jewish people appropriately since many hold this guilt and fear to do something wrong in an interaction.

Also, in Germany, Israel is perceived as the representation of all Jewish people and the only way to provide them with a safe environment. It is perceived that we cannot say anything against Israel, because this would be antisemitic, would deny Israelis the right of existence and would be against our responsibility to protect Jewish people. The easiest way for people to show that we‘ve learned from the past and that we are not antisemitic is to openly support Israel. This is much easier than to really look at the still existing problem of antisemitism in Germany. Also, many people do not understand that standing for rights of Palestinians or criticising Israel does not automatically mean that Israelis do not have a right to exist in this area.

I believe that all these things lead Germans to not knowing how to behave or talk about Israel-Palestine because they do not want to say or do anything wrong or inappropriate considering their past, and feel responsible to provide a safe space for Jewish people. However, this is also one of the questions that I am exploring in my interviews and I am happy to hear other opinions about this!

Let’s move onto your project. You have explicitly said that, at least for now, you are not interviewing Israelis and Palestinians. What’s the reasoning behind this?

My project has several parts. The first part is about so-called third parties: people who are not directly part of a conflict. There is a lot of research on collective action: why people fight for their own rights although its risky, e.g., because they have nothing to lose. However, we only know to some extent why people become active allies, and usually research showed that as soon as allyship is risky, people do not engage in allyship actions anymore. So, I am very interested to learn more about what motivates people who become active although they might face risks or barriers, and how they might overcome these barriers. I’m less interested in finding a solution or saying how things should be. I’m more interested in seeing why people fight against human rights violations and injustices; specifically, if its not common in their surroundings.

You’re looking for people who are supporting Palestinians. What does this mean to you? What counts as support?

I tried to have a really low threshold, because I know that it can be difficult in Germany to be vocal. Supporting Palestinians can be being active on social media and posting about injustices that are happening there. It can be giving Palestinians a voice or demonstrating, It can be publicly criticizing Israel.

You’ve done two interviews so far, but do you have any expectations?

First, I want to explore whether the motivations differ between allies who are active in relatively riskless contexts compared to higher-risk contexts. That is the core aim of the project.

Second, because people who are pro-Palestinian don’t really get a voice, we don’t always hear about their motivation. I want to hear about their motivations and about the bigger picture like the difference in power. So, one of the side outcomes of this project will also be to show a more nuanced view of why people get motivated. I also want to show the barriers which prevent people getting involved.

A lot of people are not aware that pro-Palestinian activism can cost you your job, or make you a victim of police violence. Germany is often seen as this really democratic country, and as a role model, but for me it is shocking that for some topics related to human rights people get silenced. This should not happen in a democracy.

Some people will argue that academia should be neutral but what you’re doing seems more like an intervention. How would you answer people who say you’ve made up your mind before you started?

I agree that science should be neutral. At the same time, I think that as a scientist you can never be completely neutral because you’re also a human being with subjective beliefs. Even if you’re creating a questionnaire, it’s you who decides which questions you ask. So, science is never completely objective.

The main question in my research is why people would risk put themselves at risk to support another group. But in Germany, there is virtually no talk about Palestine or Palestinian rights, which creates real barriers which people must overcome before they can become active. This is an objective barrier.

How easy has it been to find people to talk to you? And how are they reacting?

I reached out to a lot of organizations and Facebook groups. But to most people, I’m just an anonymous person and they don’t really know, what the aim of the project is. This can generate scepticism. Some people also say, “Why should we engage with these people from academia?”

But some people I have talked to have said that they’re grateful because no one is looking into this, particularly in German academia. I expected more negative feedback than I’ve actually received.

Suppose I’m a Palestine activist in Germany. I don’t have a lot of time, because Palestine activism is hard work. What would be my motivation to talk to you?

I can completely understand that when you’re active for an important cause, you will spend most of your energy there. I also understand that I’m more interested in the academic question of producing knowledge. This is not necessarily the same thing as activism, but it can be useful for activists. It is important to know who is motivated by what and what are the barriers preventing this. What holds people back from activism?

I’m now at an English university. But my aim is to also somehow publish my results in German. There is not a lot of information about this conflict in the German language. This is one of the barriers which prevents a nuanced debate and any deep discourse. People just don’t have access to different viewpoints.

I don’t want to just use my results and present them as an abstract paper. I also want people to get to know the different reasons why people might be active for Palestinians.

You are trying to talk to people who are supporting Palestinians. Do you think you are personally doing anything to support Palestinians?

This has been a process for me. I wouldn’t say I’m an activist. I started to see the injustices that are happening. And for a long time, I had problem addressing this because of this inner fear of being seen as antisemitic.

Over time, after I read more about the topic, I’ve become more comfortable posting things that address the injustices on social media platforms. What I’m doing now is posting a lot more and talking about the side which isn’t being shown.

What happens next with your project? How long are you interviewing people? When can you expect to publish anything – in English and in German?

I just started with the interviews, and I hope I’ll be done by the end of this year. I need to talk to 15 to 20 more people. After that, the analysis will take some time because the interviews are really long. There’s a lot of rich data. I hope I should have all the results by the middle of next year.

Publishing is a completely different story which takes a really long time. I’m thinking of making my results public in another way outside of academic journals. I’m also involved in a few other projects looking at the motivations of the general German population. It’s different talking about the motivations of people who are active vs. the general public.

If someone does want to talk to you, what sort of person are you looking for?

You have to be over 18. I’m currently searching for third-party, so no Israelis or Palestinians, but also no one from an Israeli or Palestinian family. You should be active in some way, however, already lower levels of engagement/allyship are fine (e.g., social media posts). You must have been born in Germany or lived in Germany for five years. You must understand the German context, and the difficulties of being active in Germany.

If you are interested, you can contact me via email J.Schreiber@sussex.ac.uk or reach out to me on Twitter @schreiber_jul, where you can see more about who I am as a person. At the moment, you cannot really read that much in detail about our project but I’m always happy to talk in more detail if you contact me.

One final question. Do you know what you want to do once you finish your doctorate?

I don’t know exactly. I was never sure whether I wanted to do the PhD in the first place. I came from a place where I really wanted to be more of a peace worker. But I really liked creating knowledge.

I also want to make a difference in the world. I know that academia might not always make a difference because you create knowledge, but often this knowledge stays in academia. So, I can imagine actually going more into peace building in some form, or and building a bridge between this work and academia.

For a long time, I thought that you have to go somewhere where there’s conflict, although I see it slightly different now. There’s also so much conflict happening in Germany. Every injustice is a conflict. Germany is also the context that I’m most familiar with, because I grew up here.

I can see myself working here. But I am aware that what I’m publishing might have negative consequences for me in Germany. But possible negative consequences are not a reason for me to refrain from looking into topics that are related to the injustices in Israel/Palestine and the fight for human rights.