The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

“Direct action is empowering in the sense that it counters the discourse that people cannot do anything”

Interview with Zohar Chamberlain Regev, one of the organisers of the Freedom Flotilla


08/05/2024

The Freedom Flotilla Coalition was ready to send several ships to Gaza on April 26, 2024 when Guinea Bissau withdrew its flag from two of the flotilla ships. This has meant that some of the vessels are no longer able to sail. We had the privilege of speaking with Zohar, one of the organizers of the Freedom Flotilla about these developments. Below is the transcript of our conversation.

Hi Zohar. It’s been a couple of weeks since The Left Berlin talked to you about the Freedom Flotilla. What has happened since then?

The sail date for the flotilla has been delayed due to problems with the flag state. There was a lot of pressure on Guinea Bissau;  two of our boats were sailing under the flag of Guinea Bissau. People were gathered in Istanbul ready to board the ship, and we’ve had to send them back home. We are now regrouping and getting organized. But this will take some time. 

At the same time, the Freedom Flotilla Coalition has another mission. Our work is to challenge the blockade by direct action. As we speak, our boat Handala is on its way to Gaza. It left Oslo on the first of May, and it is now in Sweden.

Handala is going to pass through a lot of ports, stopping on the way, and there will be events to raise awareness and to denounce the complicity of our governments. We want to gather support and to have different people participate on different legs. Eventually, the boat will reach Gaza with mostly a message of solidarity.

What legal arguments were used to stop the other boats?

There were no legal arguments. It’s all political. Israel wants to avoid the embarrassment or a diplomatic incident that could be a result of stopping us violently in international waters, which it has done since we started sailing with these boats to Gaza. 

In 2010, Israeli commandos actually murdered 9 peace activists on the Mavi Marmara, injured more than 50 (one martyr died after 4 years in coma bringing their number to 10), and kidnapped international activists. They were all on six different boats in international waters. Israel took them against their will. Since then, every boat that we’ve sent has been attacked in international waters. There have been no lethal attacks since 2010, but these were are all still acts of piracy by Israel on the high seas. 

They are trying to avoid a similar incident. Israel has put a lot of pressure through its proxies like the US and Germany on both the Turkish government and the government of Guinea Bissau to do whatever they can so that we will not be able to sail.

Is it the governments who are stopping you from sailing?

It was a government agency in charge of flagging boats which wrote a letter to us saying that we needed to say where we were going and get confirmation from the port of destination in Gaza. This port no longer exists because it was destroyed by the Israelis. Then they told us to say which other ports we plan to visit on the way. 

Huwaida Arraf, who was speaking at the press conference in Istanbul, compared this to a person trying to register a car and being asked, “Where are you going to drive this car?” 

It’s absolutely unheard of that a flag state requires to know where you’re going to take the ship that is being flagged. They are usually concerned with safety on board and certain regulations, but that’s all flag states generally care about. They should not ask where the boat is going. It’s absolutely none of their business.

Do you think that similar tactics can be used to stop the Handala sailing?

Handala is flagged with a Norwegian flag. There is no need for it to go through any inspections. It’s a perfectly seaworthy boat. As I said, it’s already on its way and will be stopping in many ports. People are welcome to come and see it to make sure for themselves that this is a peaceful mission. There is no reason for it to be stopped.

Of course, we expect pressure from Israel because they do not want to have to deal with us. But  this exactly why we do this;  justice and international law require that Gaza has contact with the outside world and that these things are not mediated by the same people who are trying to eliminate all life there.

On the Mavi Marmara, there were politicians from Germany and elsewhere who offered some protection because of their prominence. Who is travelling on Handala?

Right now, I don’t have the crew list with me. Some of the crew are Scandinavians, and I know that there are two people from Canada. Along the way, there will be different people joining. We are open for  more participants. We’ve had a lot of interest for Break the Siege mission. Of course, the Handala is a much smaller boat, but we do welcome participation, especially of prominent people, which will shed light on this urgent need to reach Gaza.

Which ports is Handala going to be visiting?

It is currently sailing from a port whose name I can’t pronounce in Sweden to Gothenburg, and then it will go from Gothenburg to two other Swedish ports: Halmstad and Helsingborg. Then it will go to Malmö where the European song contest is going to be celebrated, and there’s a lot of interest because many artists have been calling to ban Israel from participating due to the genocide.

From Malmö, it will go to Copenhagen and then to Bremenhafen in Germany. Following that, it will be stopping in ports in the UK, the Netherlands, France, Spain, Portugal, and so forth. 

The German government has been very strong in its support for Israel. Do you think there might be problems entering Bremerhafen?

I don’t think we should have any problem at all. The boat meets all the standards. It is an international mission. I cannot see why Germany should do anything against it. 

In the past, when I sailed on the Al Awda, we were boarded by customs or immigration. Somebody came on board and asked to see all the passports and to speak to the captain. But this was a routine inspection and then we were let go. There is no way that they can stop a perfectly legal voyage.

I’d like to hope so, but you can’t really trust German politicians.

You should trust international law. And if we are met with challenges, we will of course meet them. We have legal advice of our own. There is nothing wrong with what we are doing when we sail between European ports. There is also nothing wrong with us sailing to Gaza. The International Court of Justice says that Israel is not allowed to hinder the delivery of aid to Gaza.

What do you think will happen when you get to Gaza? You said that there was a brutal attack by Israeli forces on the Mavi Marmara. Are you anticipating something similar this time?

We are always preparing our participants, and especially at these dark times when Israel is really out of control and doing whatever it wants with no accountability. So they go through non-violence training for whatever they may encounter. 

But of course, we are doing something that is legal, moral, necessary, and right.

We do not come with any intention to confront anyone. We have said that we are sailing to Gaza. But there is nothing within our power to stop them from doing whatever they want. We know how we will react, which is with non-violent resistance. We will never do anything to attack anybody, and whatever they do is on them.

A lot of what you can do depends on international support and how much people know about what you’re doing. What are you doing to publicize the boats on top of the local actions in different cities?

The Break the Siege mission is something much larger than anything we’ve done before. Even the Mavi Marmara had hundreds of participants, but nothing close to the capacity  we have now. We have generated a lot of interest;  in some countries, the media coverage was significantly higher than in Germany 

I understand that in Germany, there was nothing said about this. But in Spain, the flotilla was a news item every day when we were in Istanbul. There is still interest; we are still getting requests for interviews. 

We have also generated interest in countries where haven’t campaigned yet, like Brazil, for example. We’ve had participants from many, many countries, and we hope to get more. We hope to get more prominent people to join us or at least show support. 

And of course, we do most of our work on social media and on alternative media, because mainstream media is controlled by the people who want to maintain the narrative that Israel is fighting terrorism, when in fact, Israel is the terrorist. 

What’s the coverage in the mainstream media been like? Have they been supportive, or are they attacking you?

We have some of the media coverage on our website. There was a very good article in the Washington Post, for example. And it’s not just about what we do. It’s a conversion of all sorts of struggles which we see all over the world now. Students at universities are demanding a stand for ceasefire for end of the genocide. This is all part of one great movement. 

I think the people around the world are all for an end to this terrible violence perpetrated by Israel on the Palestinians, not just in Gaza, but in the West Bank. And not just since the seventh of October. This month, we will be commemorating 76 years since the Nakba. People are waking up to the need to stop this terrible, racist project.

I think you’re right about the change of mood. We see this on American campuses, and even German students have started to demonstrate. Having said this, if people are waking up, they’re not always sure what they can do. How can people help what you are doing?

We ask people who want to help to, first of all, inform themselves about the situation in Palestine, but also about our work and other similar direct actions. Direct action is empowering in the sense that it counters the discourse that people cannot do anything.

It is an illusion to ask things of our governments. Governments do not listen to their people. It is us, the people, who need to act. And we need to act sometimes in defiance of unjust laws. But we can also act within the law to demand that the spirit of the law will be enforced. We see this with Palestine Action, for example, and their actions against the Elbit factories that produce weapons that are used in genocide. This has implications in other places. 

So we ask people to inform themselves, we ask people to follow us on social media and on our website. We ask people to get in touch with a local campaign if they have one. In countries where there is no campaign yet, they should get together with other people and form a campaign.

The Freedom Flotilla Coalition is an international coalition with members in countries as far apart as Malaysia. Turkey, Norway, Sweden, the US, Canada, Spain, Italy, South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand. All of these countries are pulling together resources in order to make these direct actions possible. 

But we can do so much more. For example, if people have boats, they can join us spontaneously. There doesn’t need to be a lot of organization involved in this. All it needs is for people to take the initiative and to say that we will sail to Gaza.

You said that it will soon be the anniversary of the Nakba. Is the flotilla going to be doing anything special to acknowledge this day?

On the 15th of May, the Handala will still be in Bremenhafen. Bremenhafen is not a very big city, as far as I could tell. So we are joining with an organisation in Hamburg that is organising a big Nakba demo. Our crew will join the demonstration and hopefully be able to speak to the people there.

Finally, is there anything else you’d like to say to our readers?

Here in Germany, we really need to change the discourse. A lot of people are upset about what they see and don’t agree with the government policy. It’s time that people really came out with whatever they feel. It’s time that people lose this fear of being labelled an antisemite when they stand up against genocide. This is a complete contradiction and a false understanding of the lessons from the Holocaust. And I say this as an Israeli Jew.

For more information about the Freedom Flotilla, consult their linktree page

Palivision

Cultural Event for people who want to observe the Eurovision boycott

The Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI), a founding member of the BDS movement, calls for the boycott of Eurovision 2024. PACBI and the Palestinian Journalists’ Syndicate had called on Eurovision organisers, the EBU, to ban Israel – just as Russia was banned for its illegal invasion of Ukraine – or face widespread boycotts. The EBU has instead doubled down on its shameful, hypocritical complicity in Israel’s genocide.

For this reason, theleftberlin is organising PALIVISION – an evening of live music, spoken word performances and speeches for people in Berlin who want to observe the Eurovision boycott. Join us at Al Hamra at Raumer Straße 16 in Prenzlauer Berg on Saturday, 11th May. Doors open at 6pm – the venue is relatively small, so come early to be sure of a place. The first act will take the stage at 7pm.

All money raised at PALIVISION will be donated to the European Legal Support Centre to help their fight against the repression of Palestine Solidarity in Germany. Here is the provisional programme (NOTE: times may still change):

18.00 Doors Open

19.00 Statement by Queers for Palestine

19.05 – 19.20 Amalia Chikh (France), German chansons

19.25 – 19.40 Prigari (Belgium), pop performer

19.40 Speech by Handala Leipzig

19.45 – 20.00 LIADLAND (Palestine) Electro/Arab/hip hop

20.05 – 20.20 Lucio Capece (Argentina), clarinet

20.20 Speech by Gewerkschafter4Gaza

20.30 – 20.45 J.K. Langford (no nation), spoken word

20.45 Speech by Klima4Palästina

20.50 Interval

21.10 Speech by Udi Raz (Jüdische Stimme)

21.15 – 21.30 Nasov (Italy), singer-songwriter

21.35 – 21.50 SKET Theatre

21.50 Speech by Palestine Campaign

21.55 – 22.10 Jara Nassar (Lebanon / Germany), spoken word

22.15 – 22.30 As Per Casper (Syria / Palestine), alternative fusion music

22.30 Speech by Nadija Samour

22.40 – 23.00 Nicolás Rodrigo Miquea (Chile) and friends, singer-songwriter

23.05 – 23.25 Nyio Kunt (Poland), drag act

23.30 – 23.50  Uday Al Shihabi  (Palestine/Syria), singer-songwriter

Followed by DJs

Don’t let Israel whitewash its apartheid with a glamorous Eurovision performance. Zero points!

News from Berlin and Germany, 8th May 2024

Weekly news round-up from Berlin and Germany

NEWS FROM BERLIN

VBB boss Ute Bonde is Berlin’s new transport senator

Berlin’s Mayor Kai Wegner (CDU) has announced that Ute Bonde, a local transport expert, will succeed Manja Schreiner as Berlin’s transport senator. Bonde is managing director of the Berlin-Brandenburg Transport Association Berlin-Brandenburg. She is a CDU member from Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf and will be sworn in as the new Senator for Mobility, Transport, Climate Protection and the Environment in the parliamentary session on May 23rd. Transport policy is a high priority in the city. There have been debates, for example, about the introduction of a 29-euro monthly ticket for local transport or the partial conversion of the central Friedrichstraße into a pedestrian zone. Source: rbb24

“We want the fence as quickly as possible”

After months of delays and uncertainty, Mayor Kai Wegner isn’t backing down on his plans for a fence around Görlitzer Park. In a recent interview with the German Press Agency, Wegner mentioned “legal delay tactics” deployed by the Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg district against the plans. “The tender process for the fence is still ongoing,” he said. “That’s why we can’t give a date for the fence yet,” added Wegner. “We want the fence as quickly as possible.” However, one thing is certain: it’s definitely not happening on schedule. Source: the berliner

NEWS FROM GERMANY

All four suspects in attack on SPD politicians identified

Three days after the attack on the Saxon top candidate for the European elections, Matthias Ecke (SPD), the Saxony State Criminal Police Office (LKA) has identified all four suspected attackers. They are all young Germans aged between 17 and 18 years old. However, the suspects are at large as there are no grounds for their arrest. According to the LKA, two of the suspects are already known to the police, the AFP news agency reported. The 41-year-old politician was attacked on Friday evening as he was putting up election posters for his party. He was seriously injured and had to undergo surgery. Source: tagesschau

Bundeswehr’s meetings found online

The German military confirmed earlier reports of a vulnerability affecting the Webex software that it uses for online meetings. The organization admitted last Saturday that a flaw in the video-conferencing tool left more than 6,000 of its meetings publicly accessible online. Zeit Online reported accessing German Bundeswehr meetings by using simple search terms on the military’s Webex system, and mentioned that the military only became aware of the security errors after they approached them for comment. The military said the bug was fixed within 24 hours of being reported. Source: dw

AfD trial in Münster: Will the judgement come soon?

The AfD keeps trying to delay the trial against the Office for the Protection of the Constitution. But the court wants to come to an end. It is considered practically certain that the proceedings in Münster will also determine the threat of the party being categorised as a confirmed right-wing extremist organisation. The party had already failed with two bias motions on the first day of the trial in March. After that, it had painstakingly and sluggishly submitted motions for evidence regarding the questioning of employees of the domestic intelligence service. Source: taz

Green Party and ver.di push for 15-euro minimum wage

The trade union ver.di and the Green Party, who makes up one-third of Germany’s governing coalition, are pushing for a 15-euro per hour minimum wage to be adopted by 2026. They note the German minimum wage should be increased in order to meet the guidelines of an EU Commission directive. As it stands, the German government commission responsible for deciding annual minimum wage increases has only revealed plans to increase the wage from 12,41 to 12,81 euros per hour from January 2025. The wage increase for 2026 will be decided by the German government elected in late 2025. Source: iamexpat

Study in Germany shows correlation between racism and poverty

The German Center for Integration and Migration Research (DeZIM) in Berlin published a study entitled “Limits of Equality. Racism and the risk of poverty.” The study shows a correlation between racism and the risk of poverty. The researchers searched comprehensively for discrimination: in the education system, the labor market, the housing market, and the health sector. Other studies before the current one showed that individuals with a migration background often face discrimination when looking for a job. This increases the risk of having to live below the poverty line. Source: dw

France’s Universities Occupied in Solidarity with Gaza

Report from Paris on the international spread of the Camps for Gaza


07/05/2024

Sciences Po Paris – France’s Elite School Occupied by Students

On Thursday, 340 students gathered for a town hall to debate SciencesPo’s partnerships with Israeli institutions. 

Pro-palestinian students demanded the prestigious university server its ties with them. They called for an end “genocide in Gaza” perpetrated by Netanyahu’s far-right government.

Modeled after campus consultations in the US, the gathering was a concession by Jean Bassères, the interim administrator of Sciences Po Paris.

Before the event, Bassères tried to reassure Israeli universities and donors, stating that their ties with the elite school would not be severed. 

But caving to pressure from students and activists, he committed to further discussions to decide whether the Sciences Po should take explicit positions on important political issues.

In the past, the school, widely regarded as a leading institution in political science, took stances in solidarity with Ukraine and against Marine Le Pen in 2022’s presidential election.

On Friday, French police evacuated the campus after an overnight sit-in. 

French Prime Minister Gabriel Attal congratulated law enforcement saying that “no permanent protest camp… has been established in France “which contrast[s] to what we see abroad, namely across the Atlantic.”

Anti Semitism Accusations and Red Baiting by Conservatives

About 200 protesters at Sciences Po Paris blocked their campus in April when the first wave of major mobilisations kicked off.

They received visits of support and solidarity by multiple members of France’s largest left-wing movement. Former presidential candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon went so far as to call the student activists the “honor of our country.”

Earlier in March, A member of the pro-Israeli Union of Jewish Students of France (UJEF) tried to enter a conference hall where pro-palestinian students were organizing. She says she was refused entry to the ongoing event. 

Valerie Pecresse, president of the Ile-de-France region, announced she would stop financing Sciences Po as long as “serenity and security” were disrupted by what she sees as ultra-leftist agitators. She tweeted on X : “A minority of radicals calling for antisemitic hatred and instrumentalized by LFI and its islamo-leftist allies cannot dictate their rules on our educational institutions.”

Such rhetoric will probably remind leftists of rhetoric of McCarthyist anti-communists in the 1950s or antisemitic far-right conspiracists of the early 20th century who believed “judeo-bolsheviks” were indoctrinating the youth of their day.

Although the Paris branch of Sciences Po is in the national limelight on TV channels and radio stations, other sites across France also saw protests erupt. Campuses in Rennes, Grenoble, Lyon, Saint-Etienne, and Dijon were blocked by students protesting in solidarity with Palestine. Lille’s ESJ journalism school was also blocked on Thursday. 

Sorbonne Clignancourt Campus Protests

The morning of May 2nd, hundreds of students voted to block the Sorbonne University’s Clignancourt campus.

A general assembly was called after an occupation of Paris’s prestigious Sciences Po University calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. 

Fearing a shutdown of the mobilization by the police, activists at Clignancourt rallied their classmates to evacuate their campus to show their solidarity with Sciences Po.

After a few rounds of sloganeering and rallying in front of the entrance, they marched to the nearest metro station to ride to the historic Sorbonne Latin Quarter campus to join forces with students from other branches of the prestigious school.

I talked to two militants engaged in the mobilisation at the Clignancourt campus.

Lina, a history and geography student, told me that the US campus occupations to protest Israel’s war in Gaza served as an “example.” 

For her, escalation is necessary. “We can’t expect things to change by handing out pamphlets. We need to block [our universities].” For Lina, the situation is dire – she didn’t hesitate to call Israel’s war in Gaza a “genocide” and in which universities should not be “complicit.”

Sasha, a literary arts masters student and member of the New Anti-Capitalist Party (NPA), was one of the organizers of the assembly, which he said drew 150 participants. Despite the spontaneous ambiance I felt at the blockade in the afternoon, publicity on social media allowed activists to announce the morning gathering with some advance notice.

He said that students recognized Emmanuel Macron’s complicity with Israel’s actions as a primary inspiration for their revolt. 

For Sasha, the campus occupations in the US are particularly inspiring since they are taking place in the heart of the dominant world hegemon. He admitted that France was a smaller western power, but that it was complicit in the “genocide” of Palestinians through its weapons exports to Israel.

Towards a new wave of student activism?

Movements in solidarity with Palestine are seeming to pick up traction as the weather improves and student protests sprout worldwide.

On Friday, Australia saw a wave of protests ignite across multiple campuses. Participants in rallies called for divestment from Israeli institutions and also cited the US universities occupations as an inspiration. 

This current upswell of solidarity with Palestine and newfound attention to anti-imperialist analysis could inspire future generations of young activists and students.

As the Palestinian death toll of Gaza rises to 34,600 since October 7th, 2023, urgent mobilization is needed from students and the left to call for a lasting ceasefire and the reconstruction (and eventual liberation) of the territory.

What Will India decide?

2024 will go down in history as landmark elections in India

India’s general elections began in April this year. These elections are the largest electoral exercise in the world, where 800 million people will vote and decide the fate of a fifth of the world’s population for the next five years. Over the last 77 years, with the exception of the Emergency years of 1975-77, independent India has retained its reputation for being a democratic republic, conducting free and fair elections at regular intervals, both at federal and provincial levels. India’s diverse nature has been reflected by different political parties and coalitions coming to power. Since 2014, however, when the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came into power under the leadership of Narendra Modi, the political milieu in India has changed radically. Under Modi’s rule as Prime Minister, the BJP has tried to establish single-party hegemony at the federal and provincial level using every possible trick in the book. These elections are crucial because they may well be the end of India as we know it.

In order to understand why the BJP are such a big threat, it is necessary to dig into their provenance and look at the rise of Modi in particular. The BJP are the electoral wing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) – a Hindu nationalist organisation founded in 1925, with the explicit objective of establishing a Hindu state in South Asia. The early ideologues of the RSS were inspired by the rise of fascism in interwar Europe, and were instrumental in inventing the concept of Hindutva. Nathuram Godse—the man who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi—was a lifelong member of the RSS (although they unsuccessfully tried to distance themselves from him). After Gandhi’s assassination, the RSS was banned for a short while by the Government of India. This ban was only lifted after they agreed not to participate in electoral politics. The RSS circumvented these restrictions by creating an organisation called the Jana Sangh, which, over the course of time and various organizational experiments, metamorphosed into today’s BJP.

The BJP’s first stint in power at the federal level was between 1998 and 2004, when they formed a coalition government. In 2002, Narendra Modi was the Chief Minister of the western Indian state of Gujarat. Under his tenure, Gujarat witnessed a pogrom against Muslim minorities, with with as many 2,000 (mostly Muslim) deaths. Several accusations were levelled against him and his government, for being an active participant in the massacre of Muslims. His closest ally, Amit Shah—the present Home Minister of India, and Gujarat’s Minister of State in 2002—had been charged with organising the killing of Sohrabuddin Sheikh, a man linked to the murder of Haren Pandya, a rival to Modi from within the BJP. During the court proceedings, several key witnesses turned hostile, judges recused themselves, and one of the judges died under mysterious circumstances. Eventually, the case ended up being dismissed. Together, Modi and Shah are a formidable team that rely on fear and intimidation tactics to have their way with the legal and political system.

After coming to power at the federal level, Modi’s BJP government had adopted two objectives—the complete liberalization of the economy, and the transformation of India into a Hindu nation-state. The trend towards economic liberalization is not new, and has been steadily sharpening since 1991, when the Indian economy was opened up. Broadly, government spending per capita on education and healthcare has gone down, while the share of the private sector has gone up, thus enabling the commodification of basic social welfare. The BJP has also loosened labour laws, taking away the basic rights of workers by increasing working hours, contractualizing permanent jobs, and revoking the right to protest. Agricultural laws have been changed, in order to pave the path for corporations to enter into agricultural markets; this led to massive farmers’ protests in 2021. The BJP has also brought reformed mining laws, making it easier for corporations to expropriate the country’s natural resources, often leading to the displacement of indigenous communities who have lived in mineral-rich regions for thousands of years.

These changes have particularly benefited one mega-corporation—the Adani Group, a longstanding friend and donor to the BJP. Gautam Adani, once the world’s second-wealthiest man, has benefited not only from India’s domestic policy, but also its foreign policy, as it expands its activities from Australia to Israel. This is not new: crony capitalism has been entrenched in the Indian economy for decades. The biggest trick that the BJP have pulled, however, has been to create a class of financial instruments called electoral bonds, that allow corporations to make anonymous donations to political parties. Buyers of these instruments remain anonymous to the general public, but not to the party that they donated to, allowing them to receive favorable contracts from the state. A recent Supreme Court judgment made these bonds illegal, and forced the State Bank of India to reveal the names of donors. Analyses of the data reveal that the BJP received close to 50% of all the money under this scheme, to the tune of $700 million. A list of donors reveals a number of corporations, many of whom would have wound up benefiting from receiving preferential government contracts.

Ideologically, what is unique to the BJP is the hegemonic control over the Hindu nation-building narrative that it has managed to achieve, through a combination of intimidation and propaganda. What this means is that if you dare to criticise the BJP, you become a target for attack through the various channels that they now control. Since 2014, India has witnessed an unprecedented attack on reason, protest, and any sort of activity that the government considers a threat to its interests. The scale of this attack is so vast that it is difficult to summarize in a single article. But if we zoom out a bit, a clear pattern emerges. The BJP has mobilized an army of propaganda warriors/internet trolls, whose job is to spread mis- and disinformation. This happens on social media and through tools like WhatsApp, birthing the satirical phrase, “WhatsApp University”. The electronic media, particularly English and Hindi television channels and newspapers, are largely owned either by Adani or other corporations close to the BJP. These media sources indulge in unabashed praise of the government, and shut down any kind of dissent, using terms like “anti-national” or “terrorist”, effectively rendering this government beyond critique. The BJP’s propaganda cell (the IT cell, as it is popularly known) is so strong, that it has even been successful in creating large scale communal violence across India. In addition, the BJP has successfully birthed a sophisticated group of right-wing “intellectuals”, who justify all the atrocities, violence, and attacks on civil liberties, under the garb of national pride, and spin it as creating a new decolonial history of India.

More recently, the BJP has seen scrutiny for instrumentalising institutions like the Income Tax Department, the Enforcement Directorate, and the Central Bureau of Investigation, using them to attack political rivals. Journalists and activists who have been vocal against the government have faced raids in their homes, or arrests under draconian security laws, and have seen imprisonment without trial. Laws like the Sedition Law, the National Security Act, and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act have all been strengthened, so that one can be incarcerated for years without bail, and presumed to be guilty until they prove their innocence. Universities are not only facing discursive violence, through changes in academic practices and the outright banning of any anti-government discussions, but also actual violence, where the police and Hindu nationalist mobs have physically assaulted protesting students and teachers.

The biggest challenge for the BJP to turn India into a Hindu state is the country’s more than 200 million Muslim citizens. In this regard, their tactics have also been twofold—breaking the morale of the community, and actively turning the Muslims of India into a second-class citizenry. In January 2024, Narendra Modi inaugurated a grand temple at the exact site of the Babri Masjid—a 400 year old mosque, destroyed in 1992 by a Hindu nationalist mob under the leadership of LK Advani, a prominent BJP politician. This is not an exceptional event. One of the slogans that the BJP use says that the Babri demolition was “just the beginning”, and that other mosques in Kashi and Mathura are next.

While the mosque demolitions act as a symbolic reminder to Muslims about their secondary status, in recent years, Muslims have also been lynched by so-called cow vigilantes, under the pretext that they were consuming or carrying beef. Muslim localities and houses have been demolished, solely because their residents protested against the government. Inter-faith marriages between Hindus and Muslims increasingly require special permissions from judges, due to the moral panic around “*Love Jihad”*. On multiple occasions, BJP leaders (including ministers) have called for an economic boycott of Muslims. The resemblance to 1930s Germany is stark, but probably unsurprising, given the party’s provenance. In order to degrade the Muslim population to a second-class citizenry, the Modi government recently passed a law (the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019) and intends to use it to initiate a countrywide citizenship register. This implementation was hindered by mass protests and the pandemic. However, the ulterior motive behind the law is to strip as many Muslims as possible of citizenship, and then declare them foreign nationals. This process has already been initiated in the north-eastern state of Assam, where 1.9 million people have presently been declared stateless.

Under these circumstances, the BJP’s defeat in the next elections is of utmost importance for the future of India as a democratic state. Unfortunately, the situation does not look promising; the opposition is neither strong nor unified enough to combat the colossal financial and organizational strength of the BJP. Moreover, the Election Commission of India has been losing its credibility in recent years, as it has favoured the BJP over other political parties. A free and fair election is supposed to be an impartial process that reveals the will of the general public. But this process itself is at stake, as the BJP relies on coercion, money, intimidation and propaganda. They have repeatedly bought out winning opposition candidates, or threatened them to get them to join the BJP when they have been short of a majority. Thus, there is no guarantee that BJP will lose even if there is a free and fair election. The judiciary, which has remained independent and a check on the government’s arbitrary practices, has also lost its credibility, as Supreme Court judges that have favoured the BJP agenda have been given ministerial positions upon retirement.

All signs point towards the BJP having no intention to leave office. With plans for gerrymandering, and changes to how many representatives each federal state will have at the national level, it appears that a few states from the Hindi-speaking parts of India (a bastion of support for the BJP) shall have larger electoral weight going forward. At this point, India will not only face threats against its democracy, but could fall into an actual political crisis, which might not be resolvable through elections or other democratic processes.

While we cannot predict the future, there is reason believe that 2024 will go down in history as landmark elections in India: perhaps even the last.