The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Bloque Latinoamericano Manifesto, Part 2

As part of an ongoing transformation, Bloque Latinoamericano are publicising their political manifesto.


15/06/2024

This manifesto is from the Bloque Latinoamericano, which has been translated by The Left Berlin team. We will be publishing it in three parts; this is part 2.

Political-Ideological Perspectives

In this chapter, we will try to condense how we understand ourselves in terms of being a migrant organization and how we understand our fundamental axes of intervention. These axes include migrant self-organization in Berlin, political and solidarity work with Latin America (Abya Yala), and how all these dimensions are crossed by a transfeminist vision of our political work. We also outline how we could think about a transformation of our society and how we understand ourselves as part of a broader movement in this territory.

The Migrant Perspective

Migration is a reality that has existed since the beginning of humanity. Although the reasons for migration are many and varied, we know that in the majority of cases, people migrate to improve their living conditions (to escape precariousness, wars, dispossession, and so on). For this reason, we believe that there should be conditions to migrate freely and with dignity.

This reality is shaped by the global division of economic-military power, where there is a world center that, through the dispossession of the periphery, has accumulated enough wealth to guarantee its hegemonic position, and the dependence of other territories. This same global division of power is also sustained by the racist structuring of societies. For this reason, when we migrate, we often find ourselves in an economically precarious situation and are more acutely confronted with racism.

We believe that the experience of migration allows for a critique of the current world order, and requires us to think about different ways of relating to each other and to organize in order to achieve this. Although migration does not necessarily imply that people want to fight for a better world, it generates a common and collective experience of oppression that has the potential to be politicized. Migration is a global reality, therefore, resolving the injustices that surround it is a task of structural transformation for all those who fight for social transformation, not just for those who migrate.

The Latin American Perspective

The migratory experience and the experiences of struggle in Latin America-Abya Yala constitute the place of enunciation of the Bloque as a political organization. In other words, although not all of our members have migrated or participated actively in Latin American social movements, this is the perspective from which we analyze the reality we live in today and seek alternatives to build a new system. 

We understand ourselves as children of the resistance of a colonized territory. Ever since the ruling European classes established their dominion over our territory with a system based on slavery, we have experienced incessant political and military interventions in the development of our lives. Migratory processes are entirely intersected by the violence that US imperialism in complicity with the European Union which unceasingly installs in our bodies and in our territories. 

In this sense, Bloque Latinoamericano tries to make a political synthesis that will help us transform the reality of the here and now, with our feet on the ground we stand on, but without forgetting where we came from and how we can rethink and understand ourselves in a broader movement that is trying to transform this unjust reality.

How we understand solidarity with Latin America – Abya Yala

We see solidarity with Latin America-Abya Yala as a political driving force in our daily work. It is active and stems from the conviction that we all deserve to live a life without exploitation of our bodies/territories.

Unlike charity, solidarity arises from a horizontal consciousness that takes the form of support for the struggles of workers, of indigenous peoples,* of racialized people, of the defense of territory, of women and sexual dissidents.

* In different Latin American territories, “indigenous peoples” or “native peoples” are used to refer to the communities of origin in the American territory survivors of the European colonizing genocide and white-nationalist extermination.

Our solidarity is politicized and comes from a commitment with the territorial struggles of Latin America, understanding its global complexity in the current framework of economical interactions between states, and their colonial and imperial heritage the latter in order to understand the governing geopolitical logic that is at the root of the problems with which we stand in solidarity. 

As a migrant collective, we seek to develop our own vision of the issues we address, and to be a voice on the local German scene that not only amplifies Latin American voices, but also contributes to the intertwined struggles of both continents. This implies being active participants in the discussions taking place in Germany with a voice that comes from our collective experiences.

We also recognize the importance of developing political ties with organizations in Latin America-Abya Yala in order to materialize solidarity in actions that either improve visibility or help to foster the exchange of contacts, alliances, and resources. This way, we can approach social processes that have the potential to mobilize people, both migrants and non-migrants, maximizing our capacity for impact. However, it is essential for us to move away from the paternalistic logic of “North-South” aid, as well as from academic readings and interventions that treat struggle abstract, distancing it from its materiality by focusing only on the rhetorical dimension without corresponding action.

How we understand the struggle against the precarization of life

We believe that politicizing our precariousness means understanding it in the context of a broader system, namely the neoliberal capitalist system that drives many of us to migrate and turns us into cheap labor in Germany.

To speak of capitalism is also to think of its historical dimension: in the past, capitalism used to exploit us fundamentally by appropriating our hours of work, so it could be accumulated by a few who concentrated wealth. Today, capitalism not only takes over our work (waged or unwaged), but also exploits all levels of our lives in order to continue reproducing itself: our housing, our education, our health, our body, our thoughts, and our desires. This translates into a shift from the exploitation of workers mainly in their formal workplaces and reproductive labor to a capitalism that is rooted in all the social ties of our existence.

The precarization of life, meaning the advance of capital over life, is a global phenomenon that affects the working classes all over the world. However, this phenomenon affects those of us who migrate to the countries of the center in a particularly strong wayNumerous bureaucratic obstacles, legal limitations on residence permits, language difficulties, lack of family and support networks, discrimination, racialization, illegalization and criminalization aggravate our situation and expose us to greater precariousness. This translates into greater obstacles, difficulties and injustices when looking for work and housing, or in trying to access health and education. This is how we are pushed to live a life that we often didn’t choose, but which we end up accepting because we are no longer in our countries of origin.

Through the Bloque Latinoamericano, we want to reclaim our right to fight against the precariousness of our lives and our inalienable right to organize ourselves politically against this system. We see this as a struggle for a fairer world in which we can all choose the life we want to live. It is the struggle for a dignified life, free from exploitation, against inequalities and injustices in all dimensions of life, and against the production of wealth for a few at the expense of our basic rights. 

How we understand the anti-patriarchal, queer, feminist struggle

Adding the anti-patriarchal perspective to the migrant dimension allows us to see that the realities of women and sexual dissidents are even more aggravated, and that is why we are firmly committed to our fight for the abolition of the cishetero-patriarchal system. We analyze, think, and act politically by centralizing the power in the hands of the oppressed. We also understand that there are different levels of oppression. As well as recognizing the specific oppressions that migrants and racialized people face, we highlight the oppression of those who do not align with cishetero-centrist logic.

We can only enjoy a life free from oppression if in every daily political practice we focus our work on defending the rights and lives of women, of trans people, and of the entire LGBTQI+ community, who are not only fighting for more rights, but also for the defense of our own lives. Our diverse experiences, both in Latin America and in Germany, have shown us that there is no possibility of creating a “safe space” if we don’t first fight consistently to end daily femicides, if we don’t denounce the fact that globally, the average age of a trans person is 37 years old, if we don’t fight for equal marriage, for comprehensive sex education and legal, safe, and free abortion in every corner of the world. 

We are convinced that it is the feminism of the popular majorities that has the strength to overthrow the political regime of western cisheterosexuality, and introduce a world where our lives are worth more than the profits of the capitalist system, and where children are truly free. Every 8 of March, 25 of November, and at the Alternative Pride demonstrations, we take the streets to celebrate our identities and to fight against the systemic violation of human rights. We believe that it is only from the perspective of a popular, queer, migrant, ecologist, anti-racist and anti-colonial transfeminism, that we are able to fight, day after day, the battle to achieve the revolution we are aiming for.

On our perspective on social transformation

In order to dismantle the heterocispatriarchal system that makes life precarious in every way, we must join forces to achieve the social, economic and political transformations that we so urgently need. Based on the path we have wandered, we affirm that, in the midst of the neoliberal liquidity that sometimes blinds us, only constructing solid organizations with collective memory allows us to develop tools for the struggle that makes possible the society we dream of. To achieve that, we need to combine self-organization and mobilization, so that we achieve improvements in living conditions, while knowing that the only horizon is a radical transformation that will put an end to the capitalist system. We know that we cannot achieve these objectives alone, which is why we articulate and build together with different political organizations, made up of social sectors from different backgrounds, in order to nurture our network and enrich our paths towards liberation.

The collective construction of a world without exploitation is the horizon that drives us on our daily journey. However, we don’t believe that we should wait until the capitalist system has been overthrown to start new ways of being united. For this reason, we work to ensure that the way we relate with each other, and the way we inhabit our spaces of organization are aligned with the world we fight for, simultaneously accumulating forces for transformation. In other words, we try to ensure that the practices we develop in our assemblies, meetings, and projects are prefigurative of the system we want to build. By doing so, we aim to transform everyday life into moments of liberation and construction of an alternative power led by the subaltern sectors, in other words, the construction of popular power.

In our quest to build a different society, we do so in three levels: the objective conditions, the global world system and the subjectivities.

By objective conditions we mean the economic, political, and cultural factors that make up the context or environment in which we have to develop our life and militancy. These are the variables that, although created by humanity, do not depend on anyone’s concrete willpower to exist. We think about them at the regional, national and local levels, and the transformations we seek daily are applied to these levels.

When we talk about a world system, we are referring to the global aspect of capitalism and its global division of labor. We believe that we cannot think of social changes in any single country, without taking into consideration the geopolitical aspects, specifically how the world’s center and periphery relate to each other. The transformations we will achieve in the countries we inhabit must necessarily be thought of within the framework of reigning imperialism. The subjective component is key to developing ways of relating to each other and of inhabiting spaces that resemble the ones we want to live in the society of the future. Transformations at this level, through debate, training, criticism, and self-criticism, are key components in thinking about long-term transformations.

Our characterization and our role in the German left 

We consider ourselves part of the popular struggles and social social movements in Germany, even if we often have to fight for our voices to be heard. 

We particularly highlight the struggles for the right to housing and climate justice as two of the social movements that have been the most dynamic in recent years and which have also had a strong impact on our lives, both here and in Latin American territories. We also see ourselves as part of longer traditions of struggle, which link us, for example, to the the resistance of migrant workers in the 70s.

We are currently observing a discussion within the left that emerges as a result of the post-autonomist strategy experiences in recent years, focused mainly on interventions in the public discourse. Post-autonomism has made a fundamental contribution by generating mobilizations and by breaking the relative isolation of the autonomist left, which focused on creating and defending autonomous and prefigurative spaces, rejecting everything associated with normativity.

Currently, the post-autonomous left seems to be showing certain signs of exhaustion and an absence of tools to accumulate forces and process experiences of mobilization, which constitute qualitative leaps in the struggle. In this context, another strategy that increases the importance of grassroots work and appealing to popular sectors is gaining strength, with a strong criticism of the autonomist left for its isolation, and of post-autonomism for its lack of focus on class struggle. We believe that the dichotomy between these perspectives is false and should be resolved by combining different approaches, achieving a left that is anchored in the popular sectors, capable of self-managing spaces and at the same time capable of building broad alliances for mobilization and of achieving demands.

In this context, we consider that our contribution to the left in Germany focuses on three points. On one hand, we consider the importance of political organization, which is responsible for processing the experience, gathering forces and learning, and giving continuity to struggles over time. On the other hand, we support the anti-imperialist and internationalist position, which, in the context of an imperialist center like Germany, is sometimes neglected or simplified. Finally, we develop ways of integrating emotions into political work, as means of intertwining transfeminist and anti-racist struggles into our political work. By doing so, we want to achieve a political practice that emerges from collective desire.

The Case of Dr. Anna Younes: Solidarity Outshines Shortfall of Berlin Civil Court’s Ruling

Statement by the European Legal Support Centre


14/06/2024

Case update – Despite a negative ruling, solidarity persists and ELSC funding campaign covers all costs for the court case.

In 2019, a secret dossier was created by RIAS Berlin and MBR aimed at misinforming the public about Dr. Younes’ work and opinion misrepresenting her as antisemitic and supportive of sexism and terrorism. The latter depictions resulted in excluding her from an event on anti-racism and combating right-wing networks where Dr. Younes was invited to present her work. Moreover, it was only after a public media campaign and a complaint against the Berlin Data Protection Authority (DPA) that the DPA finally acknowledged Dr. Younes’ right to access her data. On 2 May 2022, almost two years later, RIAS/MBR hence withdrew their original position that Dr. Younes had no right to access her data, released the secret dossier previously disseminated and finally acknowledged the merits of her claim. A few days later, the Berlin District Court (Amtsgericht Berlin Mitte) also handed down its decision in favour of Dr. Younes.

In the heading of the dossier, however, it was indicated that more information can be retrieved upon request of those receiving it. To this day, it remains to be clarified whether RIAS and MBR have been storing further data on Younes other than those revealed in the disseminated and leaked dossier. Practices such as these are, however, reminiscent of the work of intelligence agencies. In this case, the existence of said dossier has only been exposed through a whistleblower. This highlights once more the structural deficiencies to combat racism of the German legal system and the unwillingness of German authorities to protect Palestinians from anti-democratic surveillance by state funded organisations.

In April 2024, the Berlin State Court (Landgericht Berlin) ruled that albeit an existing breach of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Dr. Younes is still not entitled to damages, because the dossier had already been leaked to her and was thus in her possession.

Additionally, since it took the DPA two years to finally acknowledge Dr. Younes’ rights had been violated, Dr. Younes, her lawyer, and the ELSC had decided to file a complaint against its “inactivity” in an administrative court, while also filing another complaint to the civil court (Landgericht Berlin) to request damages from RIAS and MBR for withholding her data for so long. The request for damages was also rejected.

The court has missed an opportunity to protect individuals’ data rights against the distorted use of the “journalistic exemption” rule for unlawful surveillance practices as argued by RIAS/MBR. It also fails to hold state-funded organisations such as RIAS Berlin and MBR fully accountable for their repressive practices, which have serious consequences for individuals’ reputation, ability to find jobs in the future, and fundamental rights, and freedoms.

ELSC’s lawyer Alexander Gorski remarked:

“The court took the safe way out and fails to acknowledge the dangerous potential of creating a chilling effect for communities of scholars, activists, and in the arts. The court disregarded the intention of limiting freedom of expression by instilling in them the fear that their personal data and work could be constantly tracked and used against them, thereby preventing them from exercising their academic freedom.”

He further added:

“German courts have also been very conservative in handing out compensation in data protection cases.”

This case shows once more that ultimately our solidarity is our best protection: Not only did solidarity expose the secret dossier, but it also covered all costs for the lawsuits so far. We must keep pushing collectively to expose the illegal surveillance practices. The administrative case launched by Younes’ case is pending.

We are expecting the administrative court to recognise that the dossier’s preparation in and of itself as not legitimate nor lawful. So far, the DPA only acknowledge that the transmission of the data was unlawful, not its preparation. We expect the next hearing to take place next year

We would like to thank the generous donors who covered all legal costs for Dr. Anna-Esther Younes’ case.

Covering legal costs for people who suffer from misrepresentation and surveillance has been an important part of this long case and journey, and we would not have been able to see it through without your political and financial support!

Your support got us to not only meet the targeted amount needed to cover the costs, but even surpassed it. In total, we raised EUR 8,956! The surplus funds raised in this crowdfunding campaign for Dr. Younes will go into the German legal aid fund that is handling other cases challenging censorship of Palestinian rights advocates such as this case.

Furthermore, we also want to thank the 1000+ signatories who signed a letter in support of Dr. Anna Younes and against the censorship of academics, activists and journalists in Germany.

The support the ELSC’s campaign received, especially from academics and activists, highlights this shared concern against the structural issue of profiling Palestinians and Palestinian rights advocates in Germany and beyond. There remains a lot to be done. The journey is long, and the fight is not over: Your continuous support matters!

Read more about the case: Germany: A Concerning Case of Censorship and Digital Surveillance (elsc.support)

Read a recent interview with Dr. Younes on the situation in Germany by M. Hill, April 2024: The Left Berlin – “A lot of Palestinians here have the feeling of being invisible”.

The ELSC is an independent organisation that relies on the movement for its growth and impact. Support us in our fight against state repression with a minimal recurring donation. Click here to learn more.

Letter from the Editors: 13th June 2024

71 Years since the East German Uprising


12/06/2024

Tonight (Thursday), the Rosa Luxemburg stiftung invites you to a discussion with the Palestinian Knesset member Aida Touma Sliman under the title “We will not be silent and we want to resist this war”. Aida is a member of Hadash. the democratic front for peace and equality. The subject is the escalating situation in Gaza and the region and the impact of the plans of the extreme right wing Netanyahu government for a continuous war and a renewed occupation of the Gaza strip. The meeting starts at 7pm in the rls buildings, Straße der Pariser Kommune 8A. If you want to attend, please register here.

On Friday, it’s our next Palestine Reading Group. This week we will be talking about the effect of the collapse of the USSR on Palestine. You can find the recommended reading here. The Palestine Reading Group takes place every week on either Friday or Sunday. Check the page of Events we organise for the coming dates and discussion topics. If you’d like to get more involved in the group you can join our Telegram group and follow the channel Reading group. The Reading Group starts at 7pm, and there is a meeting for Moderators at 6.30pm open to everyone who’s interested.

On Saturday evening the Irish Bloc Berlin is organising a Soli Céilí for Gaza to raise money for Connecting Humanity, an initiative set up to buy and disseminate eSIMS to the people of Gaza. A céilí is a community dance event, so be prepared to give your best attempt at a jig. We will have instructors but it’s mainly about having the craic so no experience necessary. The Event starts at 5pm at LARK Berlin Holzmarktstraße 15-18. No Irish dancing experience is necessary. The Irish Bloc Berlin is our Campaign of the Week.

Also on Saturday evening, the Jüdische Stimme is showing the film Tantura. Named after a Palestinian village conquered by Jewish forces during the Nakba in 1948, Tantura centers how Tantura residents were massacred and buried in a mass grave. Using archival footage, as well as further conversations with survivors and scholars, the film explores the racism, ethnic cleansing, and repression of memory, which are central to Israel’s founding myth. The film will be shown at the Spore Initiative at 5pm with English subtitles and at 7pm with German subtitles. The second screening will be followed by a discussion panel and Q&A.

On Sunday at 2pm, it’s our latest Political Walking Tour. This month, we will be looking at 71 Years since the East Berlin Uprising. “Risen from ruins,” the anthem starts, “and facing the future.” The German Democratic Republic was founded in 1949, and collapsed almost exactly 40 years later. East Germany left behind some amazing architecture, starting with the broad avenue once called Stalinallee. We will start at the spot where a bronze statue of Stalin stood — today, only Stalin’s ear remains. Our tour will be meeting at U-Bhf Strausberger Platz, at Andreasstraße 46. We will meet at 14:00 and leave by 14:10. The tour will end two hours later at U-Bhf Magdalenenstraße.

On Tuesday at 7pm, in the Museum Neukölln, Dr. Fazila Bhimji will be looking at Namibia in Films. How is Namibia portrayed in movies and what do cinematic images teach us about stereotypes and colonial legacies? During this interactive workshop, participants will view film clips representing Namibia and South West Africa. The overall aim of the workshop in conjunction with the exhibition BURIED MEMORIES is to raise awareness to concepts of stereotypes, ethnocentrism, colonial legacies and self-representation through film. You can read the interview we carried out with Fazila here.

There is much more going on in Berlin this week. To find out what’s happening, go to our Events page. You can also see a shorter, but more detailed list of events in which we are directly involved here.

For your calendars, on Sunday, 23rd June, we are organising the German premiere of the new film Where Olive Trees Weep. From the filmmakers: “Where Olive Trees Weep gives background to the current crisis in Israel/Palestine and brings to light the lives of people we met on our 2022 journey in the occupied West Bank. Their universally human stories speak of intergenerational pain, trauma and resilience.  We hope they touch your heart, stir compassion and understanding, and give rise to a pursuit for justice. For without justice, peace remains an empty slogan.” Entry is free, but places are limited so you should reserve a ticket in advance, you can reserve a ticket on this page but you must be there 10 minutes before the film starts to claim a reserved ticket.

If you are looking for Resources on Palestine, we have set up a page with useful links. We will be continually updating the page, so if you would like to recommend other links, please contact us on team@theleftberlin.com. You can also find all the reading from our Palestine Reading Groups here.

In News from Berlin, Berlin votes more for the CDU and less for the SPD and Greens in the EU elections, TU president refuses to resign for supporting Gaza, and more money for Berlin cinemas.

In News from Germany, AfD trebles its vote amongst young Germans, pollution leads to more dead fish on the Polish border, crop failures in Southern Germany, and further delays to Stuttgart’s controversial new railway station.

Read all about it in this week’s News from Berlin and Germany.

New on theleftberlin, Nathaniel Flakin asks what is to be done with Die Linke?, in an article written before last Sunday’s French elections, John Mullen looks at the relationship between Macron and Le Pen, John Puntis looks at Labour’s plans for the NHS, we interview Israeli activist Nimrod Flaschenberg about the recognition of Palestine, Ilya Kharkow remembers Tolstoy, Colin Falconer calls for radical unity against the French fascists, Rafael Sergi remembers the Italian Communist Enrico Berlinguer, who died 40 years ago, and Swaggy analyses the Indian elections.

Our video of the week is the trailer for Where Olive Trees Weep, which we are screening on 23rd June in oyoun. Reserve your ticket here.

You can follow us on the following social media:

If you would like to contribute any articles or have any questions or criticisms about our work, please contact us at team@theleftberlin.com. And please do encourage your friends to subscribe to this Newsletter.

Keep on fighting,

The Left Berlin Editorial Board

Is Modi’s Mandate of Heaven About to Expire?

Indian voters have delivered a remarkable rebuke to the BJP in spite of all the obstacles Modi’s government has placed in their way.

On June 8th, 2024, Narendra Modi was sworn in as the Prime Minister of India for the third consecutive time. He became the second person to achieve this feat, the first being Jawaharlal Nehru, the founding Prime Minister of the Republic of India. Despite this rare accomplishment, his victory might be a Pyrrhic. To understand why, we need to examine India under Modi’s regime from 2014-2024 and the conditions under which the 2024 General Elections were conducted.

Narendra Modi, who was once a volunteer in the fundamentalist Hindu (Hindutva) fascist paramilitary organization Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), has been the face of its political front, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), since their victory in 2014. Our comrade Momo has written an excellent article on his rise and his atrocities since then. What kept Modi in power and boosted his cult of personality were three things: money, muscle, and media.

With the promise of total liberalization of the economy to make India reach a GDP of 5 trillion USD and usher in an Age of Prosperity like the ancient times (Amrit Kaal), Modi opened the doors for the most abhorrent oligarchs to support his party financially. Then, with the passing of the Electoral Bonds Scheme of 2018 in Parliament, an illegal and opaque financial instrument for political funding which the Supreme Court of India struck down in 2024, the BJP became the richest political party in India with official assets worth $72B while having more active members than the Communist Party of China.

However, two of his oldest financiers, the Adani Group led by Gautam Adani and Reliance Industries Limited led by Mukesh Ambani, were the primary beneficiaries. They were allocated key national state-owned enterprises in sectors such as energy, logistics, transportation, defense, and telecom when the state-owned enterprises were either sold off or crippled beyond measure to allow them to take over the market. Additionally, they were allowed to take over industries dominated by small and medium-scale enterprises, such as retail. This occurred while the government conducted financial and income tax raids on other companies as an indirect way to extort donations for the ruling party.

With deep pockets, the BJP used its army of trolls to harass and issue death threats to journalists and any member of civil society who dared to oppose them, first on the internet and then on the streets. They would then start spreading fake news via WhatsApp, a phenomenon now called WhatsApp University in India.

Through this propaganda network, they were capable of broadcasting slander and malice against anyone to almost every household in the country. Moreover, they encouraged their kleptocratic oligarchs to take over media houses and stopped allocating news broadcasting licenses to new channels. This made the prime-time news an organ of fascist propaganda, always maligning dissenters and upholding Modi’s cult of personality to an almost divine status. While the Prime Minister would shy away from any press conferences, he would join the newsroom with his loyal anchors who would ask him questions like, “Do you eat mangoes?” or “Is the 2024 general election just a formality because you alone would be winning?”

Any independent organisation trying to practice journalism despite all these restrictions would face the wrath of the income tax department or get handed defamation cases. Even the BBC was not spared. The BJP would then try to bribe opportunistic members of the opposition to switch sides and join the party or threaten them with legal and financial actions that could bankrupt them and end their careers, to the extent of arresting a sitting Chief Minister. All the opposition leaders had to do was jump into the BJP’s washing machine, get themselves clean, and see all their charges, both spurious and genuine, dropped; in turn, the BJP would be able to pass motions of no confidence in multiple state assemblies and further weaken the struggling opposition.

With all these in place, the BJP started to staff bureaucrats and judges as lackeys in key positions of institutions such as the Supreme Court and the Election Commission, which act as watchdogs of democratic practices and policies in India. The Election Commission decided to flatly ignore the flagrant violations of the Model Code of Conduct committed by Narendra Modi himself, such as calling Muslims infiltrators and claiming that the opposition, if in power, would give away wealth to Muslims.

This was a strategic shift from his previous narratives where he, unlike his party workers, would stay away from hate speech, relying only on misinformation and false ad-hominem attacks on the opposition leaders to display their ineptitude. He used this strategy to run a presidential-style campaign in a country used to Westminster-style elections. He successfully used these narratives of communal identity politics, caste-based discord, and economic growth to divert attention from rising unemployment, inequality, and inflation.

In this election, the BJP’s target was to gain more than two thirds of the seats in Parliament, a comfortable majority to make constitutional amendments. These include gerrymandering the legislative jurisdictions in their favour, striking off the secular and socialist values of the republic from the Constitution’s Preamble, and effectively ending democracy in India with an elected autocracy. There were also reported cases where the Election Commission rejected the candidatures of key opposition candidates, effectively making the BJP candidate win.

However, the Indian electorate unexpectedly stopped this seemingly inevitable fate. It somehow came as a shock to observers and pollsters that people, who seemed so intoxicated with religious fervour, finally came out to vote in record numbers against inflation, unemployment, and inequality. Analysis revealed that poor rural voters of lower class and caste switched their allegiances and voted for the opposition coalition, thereby protecting the amendment of the Constitution which might have ended their reservation status – an affirmative action program to equalise the effects of the millennia-old social evil that is the caste system in India.

To make the situation more ironic, the BJP and its upper-class, upper-caste urban voters never expected to lose the coveted seat of Faizabad (Ayodhya), where they erected a newly built Ram Temple, as promised in their manifesto for decades, on the grounds of the historic Babri Mosque that was demolished out of hate to legitimise their fictitious history of the subcontinent. To make it even worse, Modi was only able to win in the nearby seat of Varanasi by a meagre margin of 150k votes in a constituency of 2.5 million people, where his party workers claimed he would win by a margin of at least 1 million. Meanwhile, the Indian National Congress, the leading party in the opposition coalition of INDIA, whom Modi claimed would win fewer than 53 seats, went on to win 99 seats.

Now, with 240 seats, the BJP, which would scoff at the opposition for forming alliances and claim it would lead to unstable governments, has to rely on two extremely turncoat allies to reliably cross the threshold of 272 seats to gain a simple majority. However, given the BJP’s backstabbing treatment of its allies and snatching away seats by defecting members from their allies to their own party, raises the question of how much the BJP can rely on them. To make matters worse, these allies rely on a significant Muslim vote bank to retain their power from time to time. For now, the BJP would need these crutches to survive and struggle immensely to pass their neoliberal and fascistic agendas, which their core urban supporters voted for.

This election saw veteran incumbents fall and new faces doing grassroots campaigns for years rise. It gave many of us Indians hope to never lose trust in the 1.4 billion people of the country who can be misdirected at times but cannot be fooled all the time and can silently do magic, defying the expectations of the elite. However, there is a long road ahead to totally eliminate fascism in India, and the struggle will carry on.

The Indian people might have gotten a respite, but the pendulum can swing back anytime. Human rights activists, journalists, academics, and students are still in jail without trial under non-bailable offenses; and dissent will continue to be crushed either by censorship and threats or by bulldozers. However, after this election, I have restored faith in my fellow countrymen, and I believe we can make sure this is BJP’s and Modi’s Pyrrhus of Epirus moment at the Battle of Asculum.

Irish Bloc Berlin

Berlin-based platform for Irish solidarity with Palestine

Formed in February 2024, Irish Bloc Berlin is a community of activists from different backgrounds, equally open to people who are not Irish or European, but who share our common commitment to Palestinian liberation. We foreground international solidarity and collective organisation, and seek meaningful and practical ways to support our Palestinian and international comrades wherever possible. We aim to resist Germany’s systematic and racialised silencing of pro-Palestinian voices.

Irish Bloc Berlin stands as an expression of the Irish people’s long-held solidarity with Palestinians, advocating for liberation and serving as a forum for our collective rage and confusion in the face of ongoing injustice in social, cultural, and political institutions. We believe in the urgent need for new and interconnected structures for international solidarity and advocacy, tackling these pervasive issues from the bottom up. The Bloc seeks to remain a proactive voice of solidarity, raising funds to support Palestinian causes and promoting awareness of the genocide in Gaza as well as injustices throughout historic Palestine.

Check out past and future actions on the Irish Bloc’s Instagram and Telegram channels.