The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Fascist breakthrough in first round of elections in France: An anticapitalist perspective

The victory of the far-right Rassemblement National in the first round of elections could give France its first fascist government since the Nazi occupation, but the left has also made advances. John Mullen outlines an anticapitalist perspective on the political crisis in France.


05/07/2024

In the first round of the French legislative elections, held on June 30, around 33 million people voted while 16 million stayed home. Ten and a half million (33.2% of those voting) chose the far-right Rassemblement National (RN) and its close allies.

On the other hand, nine million (28.1%) supported the left alliance, New Popular Front, in which the radical left party France Insoumise (FI) is the most influential component.

President Emmanuel Macron’s candidates received 6.8 million votes (21.3%) and 2.1 million (6.6%) voted for the traditional conservative Republicans.

There is plenty of defeatism around. At the same time, there has been more dynamic antifascist activity in the past three weeks than in the previous three years, and this is the most energetic left election campaign for several decades.

Key questions

The most important question is not how many disagreements anticapitalists have with this or that political force. Rather, we have to start with class interests and ask what is useful for working people.

Indubitably, the New Popular Front between FI, the Socialist Party, Communist Party and the Greens is useful to the working class, and it was very much pressure from below which made it happen. Because of the two-round voting system, the mere existence of the Front took a few dozen seats away from the fascists. In addition, its program has mobilised tens of thousands of activists for a real left alternative.

The program, presented as 150 or so priority policies, includes pledges to raise the minimum wage by 14%, end homelessness, dismantle the most violent cop units, declare immediate recognition of the state of Palestine and end arms sales to Israel.

Compromises were made: leaving NATO is not mentioned and the question of nuclear power is absent. This does not means that the Greens or the FI have abandoned their policies on these questions. Each signing party may continue to defend its own priorities.

The parties agreed to share out the constituencies and not stand against each other. This means that some of the candidates have nothing in common with anticapitalists. For example, the Socialist Party chose social liberal and former President François Hollande as a candidate. This was the price of an indispensable alliance.

At present, the fascists are far more powerful inside parliament than they are outside. Despite receiving up to 13 million votes in some elections, the RN cannot organise mass street demonstrations. In most towns they have little party structure. Winning more than 200 seats in parliament, which looks possible, could be a huge step forward for the RN. Therefore, this week the electoral battleground is the key one.

Those on the left who counterpose the left electoral alliance with the struggle on the street are mistaken. The Front has encouraged antifascist activity. Young people on demonstrations are chanting “Siamo tutti antifacisti!” (“We are all anti-fascists!”) and “Front populaire” (“Popular Front”), as well as “Free, Free Palestine!”

Also tremendously useful for working people is the broad antifascist activity that has been storming France this fortnight. Left parties, trade unions, women’s rights groups, charities and pressure groups such as ATTAC and Greenpeace are pulling out all stops, leafleting railway stations and contacting all their supporters.

800,000 people demonstrated in more than 200 towns in a trade union initiative. Women’s rights groups organised marches in dozens of towns. Every day there are rallies called by youth organisations or the radical press, and so on.

A huge outdoor concert on July 3 in Paris heard from Nobel Prize-winning novelist Annie Ernaux and dozens of speakers. Appeals against the far right are surging from unexpected circles. 800 classical musicians signed one appeal, 2500 scientists another, and there have been similar initiatives from social science journals, university chancellors, rappers and rock musicians. Star footballers, cyclists from the Tour de France and many more have added their voices. Academic societies, the left press and the Theatre festival in Avignon have organised appeals or events.

Although trade union representatives often concentrate on the horrific economic policies of the far right, others on the left have rightly prioritised antiracism. At his mass meeting in Montpellier ten days ago, FI leader Jean-Luc Mélenchon put antiracism, and specifically the fight against Islamophobia, front and centre. On prime-time television, FI MP Clémence Guette and others emphasised that racism is at the centre of RN’s ideology.

Mass involvement in antifascist activity of all kinds is one way of countering the 24-hour-a-day barrage of media propaganda about “left and right extremism” and lies about the supposed violence and antisemitism of the radical left.

Inseparable 

The electoral campaign of the left, and antifascist activity, are not generally separate. In one week, more than 50,000 people registered as supporters of the FI, and tens of thousands asked to get involved in the campaign. Dozens of buses are criss-crossing the country, bringing FI members and other activists to help out in towns where the RN is strong. Mass door to door canvassing — not a traditional part of election campaigns here — is becoming commonplace.

More antifascist activity, the establishment of permanent networks for antifascist education and combatting harassment, and a stronger FI are all necessary.

Despite the limits of the FI’s “citizens’ revolution perspective”, the party has loudly denounced the genocide in Gaza and brought the fight against Islamophobia into mainstream left politics — from where it had been shamefully absent for decades. It has also succeeded in putting the importance of taxing the rich, moving to 100% organic farming and 100% renewable energy centre stage in the political debate.

If the FI and, in particular, Mélenchon are attacked so viciously, it is because they represent a radical break with neoliberal business-as-usual. This is the reason for their very high scores in multi-ethnic working-class parts of town, and their ability to attract large numbers of new activists.

The second round 

In places where no candidate received over 50% of the vote, a second round of voting will take place between the top candidates. Candidates need at least 12.5% to reach the second round, meaning in some places there are still more than two candidates running.

Macron, having spent years encouraging far-right ideas, is now declaring: “Not one vote should go to the National Rally.” However, some of his MPs refuse to call for a left vote in towns where only the left and the fascists are in the second round contest.

On the left, the question of what to do when a left candidate came third in a town in the first round is causing heated argument. Supporting Macron against RN’s Marine Le Pen has been disastrous over the past seven years. On the other hand, it is possible to withdraw a left candidate without calling for support for the right-wing or centre-right candidate remaining in the race. FI has generally limited itself to campaigning for “not a single vote for the RN!”

The results of the second round of the elections on July 7 are impossible to predict. What those who abstained last week can be persuaded to do is crucial.

The most likely outcome is that there will be no overall majority, but no coalition will be easily constructed. Much of the right will refuse to govern with the RN.

A “government of national unity” including conservative Republicans, Macronists and some Socialists and Greens is being spoken of. This would be disastrous. A national unity government that abandons pro-working class radical reforms is likely to prepare the way for a stronger RN government in a few years.

A small section of the right wing of the FI might even be tempted by this. However, there may well not be enough MPs on the left to make such a government happen. In any case, like every political configuration in this deep crisis, the New Popular Front is fragile.

If no stable government can be formed, extra-parliamentary struggle will be more important than ever. The building of a strong radical left must continue, and Marxists must work inside it while keeping their own fraternal but fiercely independent voice.

With a center like this, who needs fascists?

Tens of thousands of people mobilized against the far-right AfD. The government is nonetheless implementing parts of the Far Right’s agenda.


03/07/2024

Last Saturday, tens of thousands of people tried to block the party conference of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) – »nd« reported that over 30.000 people demonstrated through the city of Essen.

Unfortunately, though, we cannot say that Germany’s Far Right is on the back foot. Not at all. The AfD is setting the agenda for both Olaf Scholz’s »progress coalition« and for the conservative opposition: Just a few days earlier, the government announced a new law to deport people who »glorify terrorism«. A faceless bureaucrat, without any kind of trial, could decide what constitutes »terrorism« and what constitutes »glorification« – a single like on social media could be enough. Let’s not forget that right-wing newspapers have been accusing not just Palestine solidarity demonstrations, but even peaceful climate protests of »Terrorismus«.

This is just the latest measure in what »nd« columnist Leo Fischer calls a »racist frenzy«. The EU parliament, with the support of the Green party, voted that asylum seekers, including children, should be put in prison camps at Europe’s borders. The German parliament passed a law to make it easier to deport people – and now Olaf Scholz wants to deport people to Afghanistan and Syria (which would mean having to work with the Taliban and the Assad regime). More and more asylum seekers are being forced to use restrictive debit cards (Bezahlkarten) instead of cash.

The AfD has been demanding such measures for years. What does it mean when the parties of the center call on us to »vote against the enemies of democracy«, as we recently heard before the European elections? Are we supposed to be content that other parties are attacking democratic rights?

Watching German TV news can feel surreal: the top item is about Germany needing millions of additional workers just to keep the lights on; the second headline is about politicians from all parties hunkering down to increase deportations. Some say that Germany is »full«. Do they even realize that in 1950, the Federal Republic had something like eight million refugees? It must have felt different because they were white and Christian.

Earlier this year, millions of people took to the streets against the AfD’s secret plans for mass deportations. Scholz chose to ignore some of the biggest protests in the country’s history, and instead follow the AfD’s lead, proclaiming »we have to deport people more often and faster«. All of Europe’s self-described centrists seem to have the same theory: That voters want more racism, so in order to stop the Far Right, the center needs to implement racist measures itself.

Clearly, this is not working: even as the French and German governments swerved to the right, they got trounced in the European elections by forces far to the right of them.

If every single party agrees that migration is Europe’s biggest problem, then people are going to turn to the people who have been warning about immigration for years. The AfD’s sincere racism will win out over Scholz’s cynical, opportunist version. If the goal is to deport lots of people, then the AfD seem like experts.

Racism is an almost perfect topic for capitalist politicians. Many problems – from exploding rents to understaffed hospitals to crumbling schools – can be blamed on immigrants. Talk about this supposed »crisis« enough, and no one will notice that billionaires don’t pay taxes.

Refugees are workers, and laws against immigration never actually stop people from coming – they only stop people from enjoying basic rights once they get here. Racism forces immigrants to work for lower wages, and thus lowers the wage level for everyone. It’s in our interest as workers to fight for full citizenship rights for everyone.

In France, Emmanuel Macron has reminded everyone how the center is paving the way for the Far Right. We need to fight against all racist laws, whether they come from the AfD or the Greens.

News from Berlin and Germany, 3rd July 2024

Weekly news round-up from Berlin and Germany

NEWS FROM BERLIN

Street renamed and inaugurated after black lesbian feminist

In Berlin-Kreuzberg, part of Manteuffelstraße was renamed Audre-Lorde-Straße back in September 2023, causing confusion among residents, parcel deliverers and authorities, since the official inauguration only took place recently. At the inauguration, district mayor Clara Herrmann (Greens) apologised for the fact that the renaming had “taken longer.” The reason given by the administration for not putting up new street signs for months was that the renaming process had led to unforeseeable problems. The new street name brings more diversity to Berin. It honours the black lesbian feminist Audre Lorde, who taught at the FU Berlin in the 1980s and 1990s. Source: freilich

NEWS FROM GERMANY

New citizenship law comes into force

On Thursday, 27 June 2024, the Act on the Modernisation of the Citizenship Law comes into force. With it, the Federal Ministry of the Interior is implementing a key reform. People who work in Germany and are well integrated can become German citizens after just five years instead of eight. Moreover, they no longer need to give up their previous citizenship. Under strict conditions, naturalisation will also be possible in the future after three years. At the same time, the requirements for commitment to the free democratic basic order will become stricter: naturalization will be ruled out when racism or antisemitism is identified. Source: bmi

Hundreds of right-wing extremists in the police

Within one and a half years, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) has dealt with a total of 739 cases of employees of security authorities with indications of possible right-wing extremist attitudes. The current report covers the period from 1 July 2021 to 31 December 2022 and looks at both state and federal authorities. According to the report, state authorities accounted for 189 cases. However, the Federal Ministry of the Interior points out that more than half of the suspected cases and the cases in which actual indications were found had already been reported in the previous status report. Source: taz

AfD party conference in Essen: football and federal cooperation

Before the party conference in Essen, there was much speculation about how the AfD leadership would deal with the turbulence of recent months. Neither Alice Weidel nor Tino Chrupalla cut a good figure in the affairs surrounding Maximilian Krah and Petr Bystron. Things turned out quite differently in Essen. Weidel opened the party conference with a welcoming speech, speaking about her party using football metaphors, saying that the “team” has to make a “tactical change”, even if a “talented player” (Krah) must leave. Churupalla cited the cooperation within the federal executive and with the state chairmen as an important point in his work review. Source: nd

Nothing new for the East

First in Saxony and Thuringia, then a few weeks later in Brandenburg: in all three states, the AfD threatens to become the strongest force. This would be a fiasco for the CDU in the states, but also for the party chairman Friedrich Merz. So what to do? Last weekend, Merz invited the party presidium, i.e., the inner circle of leadership, to Berlin. An important campaigner was not present, though: Saxony’s Prime Minister Michael Kretschmer. Officially, there were scheduling problems, but one can also speculate that the Kretschmer did not really wish to participate in the meeting. Source: tagesschau

Euro 2024: the AfD and a debate over ‘woke’ national team

During Euro 2024, many German politicians are supporting the host team, but this is not the case of several members of the far-right AfD party. According to them, the German team is not German enough. They do not share the sense of pride in the country’s role as host or the hope for another victory like that during the Germany-hosted 2006 World Cup. AfD leaders such as Maximilian Krah and Björn Höcke complain instead about Germany having become “woke,” “politically correct,” and “the rainbow team.” Source: dw

German weapons exports on the way to a new record

Arms exports from Germany rose 30% in the first semester of 2024 compared to the same period in 2023, as shown by data from the Ministry for the Economy. If the trend continues for the remainder of the year, the total value of arms sales is set to reach a new record. Between January 1 and June 18, the government approved total weapons exports worth at least €7.48 billion. The surge in exports comes despite the governing coalition of Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) promising to curb arms deliveries when it took office in December 2021, especially to non-European Union and NATO members. Source: dw

Millions on the sideline

“Every seventh child in Germany is at risk of poverty,” the Federal Statistical Office announced on Monday. According to the Office, children and young people of parents with “lower” educational qualifications are disproportionately affected. Meanwhile, the traffic light coalition is allowing its “‘central social policy project’ – basic child benefit – to wither away,” Christoph Butterwegge, a political scientist from the University of Köln, commented. Since the beginning of the debate, it has been “a tactical stalemate within the traffic light coalition,” continued the inequality researcher, who says that the basic child benefit to be launched only in 2025 is “a waste of time.” Source: jW

“I cannot believe that this global awakening will not lead somewhere”

A wide-ranging interview with Jordanian activist Dania Gharaibeh on the war against Palestine.

Hello Dania. Thanks for talking to us. Could you start by introducing yourself?

My name is Dania Gharaibeh. I am based in Amman, Jordan. I’m half-Egyptian, half-Jordanian, and I’ve been involved in activism for Palestine for two decades now. I lived in Washington, DC, and did awareness raising there. I work on gender equality, diversity and inclusion in the humanitarian sector. Right now I work with a humanitarian organization responding to Gaza.

Could you say something about recent pro-Palestine activity in Jordan

In Jordan, I don’t think anybody talks about anything else but Gaza these days. There are a number of protests. I participate as much as I can and take my 5-year old child with me but can’t stay long. Protests are often started by a small group of people in specific spaces, i.e. the Israeli Embassy, and proliferate through social media. The most active group diligently organizing protests are the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood and other affiliated Islamic movements. There have also been efforts by the workers unions, medical workers syndicate,and the lawyers syndicate. Fridays witness the largest protests where most of us know where to go after prayer. I would say that the biggest protests have really happened spontaneously. Gaza is on all of our minds and we all feel the need to do more than just voice out our frustration on social media.

To understand how Jordanians are feeling, it is important to know the relationship between Jordan and Palestine. Historically, the people in what is now called Jordan (a.k.a. Transjordan prior to 1946), and the people in Palestine, have always been one people. Jordan as a nation state, with its current borders (give or take) was created in 1946 as a result of British colonialism of this region. The Brits have allied with a number of key tribes across the Levent area and the Arab peninsula to expel the Ottomans during the first World War. After the Ottomans’ defeat, the Brits (and the French) made some back of the napkin deals with the heads of these tribes to divide the region up and assign each of them a territory to establish a sovereign state. In a nutshell, a bunch of drunk white men wanted to appease a bunch of territorial tribesmen and divided and conquered. By the way, there is even literature about how much booze was consumed by these diplomats during this period.

At a socio-cultural level, the division between Jordanians and Palestinians are superficial and trivial. We differentiate each other the way Germans jokingly talk about the differences between Southwesterners and Rhinelanders, for example. Palestinians and Jordanians have the same folklore, traditions, dress, food, landscape, vernacular, even slang. The West Bank is less than two hours away from downtown Amman.

Today Jordan falls between Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Palestine, and Syria. If you look at the different people that make up Jordan, the ones that fall around Palestine and Syria have always been identified as Levantines first. These are our people we are seeing getting slaughtered. 

In addition, Jordan fought Israel when it was created in 1948 and annexed large parts of the West Bank where it granted its people Jordanian citizenship. And then we have the many Palestinians who sought refuge in Jordan during and after the 1967 war. Many of whom continue to live in refugee camps across Jordan to this day.

Consequently, over 70% of people in what is now called  Jordan are from Palestinian villages. This is why Jordan has become an epicenter of pro-Palestine activism, aside from Yemen, of course – we cannot forget what the Houthis are doing. 

We got reports about a month ago about very big demonstrations in Jordan. Was that a one off or is it part of a bigger series of events?

The protests are almost constant but their size ebbs and flows based on the brutality of the events unfolding in Gaza as well as the perceived complacency of the Jordanian ruling class. It’s like a fire that every now and then gets stoked with Israeli atrocities and global leaders, and especially Jordanian leaders’ inaction. We are all glued to our social media and TVs. Many of us see that the only way to react is to join the demonstrations. In Amman, most demonstrations happen at the same places which include large, central mosques and the Israeli Embassy.

The demands are clear and consistent. People want the ruling class in Jordan to cut all ties with Israel. As you know Jordan normalized relations with Israel under the Wadi Araba Peace Treaty in 1994. Diplomatic normalization and trade exchange were central in this agreement. Jordanians want to see all ties severed. So far, diplomatic ties have been suspended temporarily when the Jordanian government announced that the Israeli Ambassador – who fled Jordan after October 7th, 2023 – will not be allowed back in Amman and withdrew the Jordanian Ambassador from Israel. However both parties continue to acknowledge each others’ border security. Or in other words, Jordan continues to protect Israeli borders! As for trade ties, we know that they are still in place. These include import, export, and free trade zones. This normalization of relations doesn’t reflect the Jordanian people’s will. 

Another demand is to support the resistance. The overwhelming majority in Jordan view Hamas as a legitimate militant resistance to an occupation. Chants in the protests include “we are all Hamas” and “open the borders, we want to join the fight.” If the Jordanian-Israeli borders were opened, I am certain thousands of young men and women will want to join or at least finance and support militant resistance on the other side.

The protests were largely peaceful until February this year where there was a huge crackdown. That is where we began seeing the use of tear gas and arrests. We have also started seeing arrests of activists for their online content under a rather oppressive cybercrimes law that was passed in August last year. 

The largest crackdown was in April this year after the Iranian attack on Israel. Jordan proudly announced that it intercepted and countered the missiles. This was seen by most Jordanians as a betrayal. In fact, some felt that Jordan endangered Jordanians by hitting the missiles which landed on Jordanian homes and shops to protect Israel. We woke up one morning to hear of missile debris in public spaces, some of it being sold on e-Bay! This led to protests that had anti-government and anti-monarchy chants.

Jordan as a country doesn’t have many natural resources… One of the only things it has going for it is its geopolitical importance… Jordan receives over $ 1.5 billion from the U.S. in aid annually. The U.S. Government has provided Jordan with more than $17.3 billion in foreign aid since its creation in 1946.

The crackdown since has calmed down the past few months but that may be because the protests are not as big as they used to be recently.

One of the sore points is that Jordanian security forces continue to protect the Israeli embassy which protesters often try to breach. If you go near the Israeli embassy, there are military security forces that block access to most streets heading to the embassy.  I know it’s their job, and it’s impossible for them to get out of the chain of command. But that has always been the point of tension between the Jordanian public and Jordanian security forces. 

My father lives right next to the Israeli embassy and I often experience the tension in that area first hand.

What’s the attitude of the Jordanian government towards Israel?

Jordan is a monarchy. The cabinet is appointed by the king. The National Assembly has two chambers. One appointed by the king and another based on elections. Civic participation in elections is very weak. Voter turnout in the last parliamentary elections was below 30%.  I am sharing all this to point out that the government doesn’t represent its people in Jordan.

The Jordanian government has always brilliantly played a balancing act. It has a rhetoric for internal consumption and another for international consumption. In reality, Jordan decided to normalize relations with Israel  and accept the occupation as a de-facto presence in the region since the 1970s.

The reality is, the Jordanian government is very much under American rule, and serves American interests. Its very sustenance is dependent on that. Jordan as a country doesn’t have many natural resources. Economically, it is in a very dire place. One of the only things it has going for it is its geopolitical importance, for example during the Iraq War or for Palestine. This is its biggest commodity for diplomacy, and it has used it accordingly. Jordan receives over $ 1.5 billion from the U.S. in aid annually. The U.S. Government has provided Jordan with more than $17.3 billion in foreign aid since its creation in 1946. Recent news revealed that there are over 3000 U.S. troops in Jordan.

We were and continue to be deprived of experiencing the evolution of a political consciousness because any awakening will jeopardize Israeli and American interests.

So Jordan is walking the line. Against its public’s wishes. And with no strong representative political bodies, the public will continue to be ignored. Jordan deals with Jordanian dissent, especially against its alliance with the U.S. and by extension Israel, as a chronic illness that can be managed when it flares.

The lack of representative political bodies across the Middle East and not just in Jordan is, indeed, by design. Any attempt across the Middle East to have a democratically elected rule that represents the will of its people will be disastrous to Israel. We have been deprived of democracy, human rights, and all the other freedoms we are entitled to for the protection of Israel in the nation. Almost 500 million people in the Middle East pay and have paid the price of this occupation for over 7 decades.

I am half Egyptian and half Jordanian. I know from my parents’ generation how the left, which represented the political leanings of a critical mass back then, was squashed and pulled out from its roots in both countries during the 60s and 70s and later replaced with religious fundamentalism and later globalization that serves neo-colonial interests. We were and continue to be deprived of experiencing the evolution of a political consciousness because any awakening will jeopardize Israeli and American interests.

What does this mean about the demands of the demonstrations? Are they just about Israel, or are demands made of Jordan or the USA?

The demands are very clear: to sever all relations, revoke the peace treaty, revoke any economic ties – there is significant exchange in produce, water, gas, energy.

As mentioned earlier, the clearest demand, especially from the youth, is to open the borders. A lot of young men and women want to go into Palestine now. For many, that means going back home. There have been many skirmishes at the borders. In 2021, over 6 young men infiltrated the border.

If you go towards the borders of Israel or Palestine with Jordan, you find that the checkpoints start maybe 100 kilometers before you reach the border. And it’s one checkpoint after one another to stop any breach of that border.

Do you think the demand to open the borders can be successful?

No, never. No. 

The stakes are too high for Jordan. One of the reasons the monarchy has been able to survive is the economic situation in Jordan. While Jordan is in a dire place, it is not Syria or Iraq or Egypt. Its economy is relatively stable because of the injections of aid it is able to mobilize by walking the line.

As I said earlier, Jordan has allowed the U.S. to have military outposts on its soil. This was not known to the public until the death of 3 American soldiers and wounding of 30 more was announced by the Americans in January. Jordanian officials shamelessly went on TV denying the presence of American bases in Amman despite the news. It was later revealed that this is one of many posts. Some hypothesize that some are even there to support Israeli intelligence gathering and protect Israel.

It was rather embarrassing for the Jordanians. On one hand the White House was saying that their troops were killed in Jordan, on the other Jordan denying their very presence.  I think it was a glitch in the system in their coordination with one another. 

Can you talk about the wider region as a whole? There are lively demonstrations in Jordan, but not in Egypt. What is different about Jordan?

Although Jordan is not a full democracy and not the ideal place for free speech it is nothing compared to Egypt. Egypt’s crackdown on civil society and freedom of speech during Sisi’s reign is unprecedented. We’re talking about draconian levels. People just disappear for expressing the slightest disapproval. So there’s much more at stake in Egypt. 

In addition, Sisi has overwhelmed Egyptians with a rhetoric that the world is conspiring against Egypt, and wants to destroy it. He shut down any dissent and has only allowed communication about how foreign agents are trying to destroy Egypt by inciting political upheaval. A lot of Egyptians who are barely able to make ends meet believe this rhetoric, so there’s very little engagement.

Today, the Left is merely a theoretical framework to be admired from afar. Left icons, literature, concepts are celebrated but only at a cultural level. Never as a concept to reimagining political life.

The challenge in Egypt is that political opposition has been completely annihilated after the 25 January revolution and especially since Sisi took power. The economic problems are much bigger than in Jordan. The living standards are much lower. And people are really just so busy trying to make ends meet and very disincentivized to speak up because the price could easily be their lives.

Is there much contact between the movement in Jordan and people in Egypt? Do you get the feeling people in Egypt are watching what you’re doing?

Liberation movements across Egypt and Jordan are ailing and struggling. When I was studying in Egypt 20 years ago, I was part of the progressive left. The movement was small but at least it existed. It even coordinated with like-minded movements in Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon. In Sisi’s Egypt all forms of opposition were thwarted. You can only do politics in Egypt if you are loyal to Sisi. In Jordan, the Muslim brotherhood and small Islamist-leaning political parties have increasingly gained traction over the past two decades. But so far there have not been cross country movement mobilization across any part of the political spectrum. Many of these movements are barely staying alive.

What is the state of the Left in Jordan? You said earlier that the Muslim Brotherhood and some trade unionists are organising things. How strong is the Jordanian Left?

Sadly, both in Jordan and Egypt, the left now is nothing but a cultural movement. It has lost faith in mobilizing masses when it was pitted against Islamists movements. Secular opposition is all but dead in both countries.

I know it is a bleak picture but it is the truth. 

In the early 60s, anti-occupation activism and resistance movements in the Middle East were established by the Left. The Left or left-leaning rule in the Middle East posed a great threat to the West as well as Israel. Simply because the left was anti-colonialist. The Left never saw the day of light in this region because of that. Even left-leaning governments, such as Nasser in Egypt, were embargoed.

Today, the Left is merely a theoretical framework to be admired from afar. Left icons, literature, concepts are celebrated but only at a cultural level. Never as a concept to reimagining political life. There is no political organization at all, or political aspirations for the Jordanian Left. It is very weak, and has limited itself to cultural leftism.

Do you see any chance of the Jordanian Left becoming more active through the demonstrations?

No. The momentum is really being hijacked by the Muslim Brotherhood, and other Islamic movements. I attended a protest In 2014 against the massacre that was going on in Gaza then and found only one person, one sole person, holding a banner for the Jordanian communist forum. I was ecstatic to see him. That is how much of a rarity that was. I screamed at him from across the crowd “Comrade. Hello!!!” I even took a picture of him. I asked him if he was part of a larger, more organized group. He said he was but today he showed up to the protest on his own.

I don’t really see the left picking up anytime soon, partly because of the lack of mobilization. The Islamist movement has always been much better at mobilizing, and has always been better at providing tangible and immediate social support to communities. People want to come to a political event to receive a bag of flour or sugar. Not to hear about class struggle and the evils of capitalism.

Have you any sense of what will happen next in the region?

The occupation and its support system are  a mammoth, and mammoths move slowly. I really don’t know what will happen, but I cannot believe that this global awakening will not lead somewhere better. But I don’t think it’s going to be a sudden shift. It’s going to be incremental and cause a lot of pain.

But I’ve never seen this global awakening to the Palestinian struggle that I am witnessing here. That’s the only thing giving me hope. Right now it has become normalized to criticize Israel amongst many circles. I know it’s not in Berlin yet, but even there it’s much more than it was two years ago. My only hope is that this will lead to action. I do believe that right now it’s still stuck at rhetoric. But rhetoric precedes action.

In democracies like Germany, you actually elect your representatives, and with a social justice lens. This demonstrates your awareness of the privilege that you have in that democracy as this awakening proliferates and becomes more pervasive.

Apart from changing our governments, is there anything else that people in Germany can do to support the movements in Jordan and the Arab world? 

Start talking outside your own circles. We continue to gather with like minded people. This is very cathartic and important, but how do we raise awareness of people who are on the fence? How do we raise awareness of people who are too busy and don’t want to be inconvenienced in their daily life with what’s happening in the world? 

How we can galvanize the neutrals is very important. Yet many progressive movements in the world end up sitting in our own choir and talking to each other about things that we agree with. We need to think strategically about how to galvanize more people into the cause.

Solidarity Prints

t-shirts and prints for Gaza


02/07/2024

@synecdocheberlin has produced a series of t-shirts and prints in support of @besan.baroud9, who is raising money to evacuate her family from Gaza. After the tents massacre in Rafah at the end of May, which happened very close to their tent, Besan, her parents and two brothers have been displaced again to Nuseirat. They’re now living in another tent there, together with her brother’s wife and two young daughters. Facing massive inflation and without income for 9 months now, the family have had to use some of these funds – which are now supporting 9 people – to cover basic living costs. 100% of your donations to this campaign all go directly to that goal, and help them survive until the borders reopen.

Three ways to support!:

A4 native Palestinian herb prints, €15:

This series of riso printed linocut illustrations features Palestinian native herbs whose collection has been criminalized by the occupation through weaponizing dubious claims of “environmental protection”. Because foraging for these traditional staple plants is currently punishable by fines and up to three years in prison, harvesting them is regarded by some as an act of resistance. Inspired by the work of Jumana Manna, and all the constant gardeners and plant relatives who in the face of unrelenting horror, continue to teach us life.

T-shirts (available in size L, XL, XXL), €25:

Wear it to the grocery store, to the reading group, to the next action. Keep donating, keep showing up. ❤️ 🌱 This design is inspired by the poppy anemone, used as a symbol of Palestine because it shares the colours of the Palestinian flag.

A3 Palestinian flag prints, €25:

The prints are LARGE! A3 size (29.7×42 cm/11.7×16.5″) and will come flat packed with a hard backing.

The text on all prints and shirts reads “Free Palestine”.

You can order from @synecdocheberlin on Instagram or by mailing apriebe@ualberta.ca.

Solidarity is a practice – today and every day until Palestine is free. Until then, we don’t stop.

فلسطين حرة