The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

August 28 1968 – Police attack protests outside the Democratic National Convention

This week in working class history


27/08/2025

The 1968 Democratic National Convention took place in Chicago from 26-29 August against the backdrop of international unrest following the assassination of Martin Luther King in April, the May Events in France, and growing opposition to the Vietnam War. By then, a military draft was in effect, and 500,000 US Americans were serving in Vietnam. It was an election year, and President Lyndon B. Johnson had announced he would not seek re-election.

Chicago mayor Richard P. Daley was a Democrat with a track record of repression. In April 1968, cops under his command had attacked peaceful anti-war marchers, and following King’s assassination he ordered police to “shoot to kill”. For the Convention, Daley put 12,000 police on 12-hour shifts and called in 13,000 National Guardsmen. Demonstrations were called outside the Convention, but the threat of police violence meant that only 10,000–20,000 demonstrators came to Chicago.

On 28 August, protestors marched to the conference headquarters in the Conrad Hilton Hotel, where cops wielding clubs and pepper spray attacked demonstrators, journalists, and passers-by. An official investigation later called this a “police riot”. On the conference floor, Senator Abraham Ribicoff denounced the “Gestapo tactics”. Daley replied by shaking his fist at Ribicoff and yelling, “Fuck you, you Jew son of a bitch.” 

The attack was captured on TV news, which showed the demonstrators chanting: “The whole world is watching!” The US state looked for revenge, and put eight people on trial for allegedly organising the demonstrations. The only Black defendant, Black Panther leader Bobby Seale, was bound and gagged before he was allowed to enter the courtroom. Six of the defendants were sentenced to four–five years in prison. All convictions except Seale’s were overturned on appeal.

Looking back at the 1968 Convention, it is easy to spot similarities to the latest. In 2024, an election year in which an unpopular Democrat President—who would not stand again—was financing an unpopular war, the Democrats held their convention in Chicago. Later that year, Richard Nixon, a right wing Republican, won the election. Then, as now, the Democrat establishment blamed the anti-war movement for their defeat. Then, as now, they had only themselves to blame.

La France Insoumise prepares for a hot autumn

Report on FI summer school and larger impacts on the French left

Members of the France Insoumise party on a float during a parade. Some are triumphantly raising fists.

Well over four thousand people attended the radical left France Insoumise (FI, “France in Revolt”) summer school in Valence, in the South of France, this weekend. Around five hundred of them had spent two days previously at a young people’s event for activists under 26.

Meetings at the summer school ranged from “Introduction to Historical materialism” with Stathis Kouvélakis to “Building a Young People’s Antifascist Movement Across Europe” to “Is the Nation a left wing idea?” Among the 110 debates and round tables, there were meetings on secularism, Islamophobia, the conflict between China and the US, racism at work, housing injustice, defending the climate, building local branches, pesticides, animal rights, police violence, Palestine, extractivism, and fighting homophobia.

While this is a sharply radical organization, it is not a revolutionary Marxist one. Thus, many talks emphasized relying on the United Nations, and changing the laws on racism or sexism. But the insurgent tone of the movement was very real. In a situation where many forces are calling for a yellow-vest style day of action on September 10th, Jean-Luc Mélenchon said in his (two hour!) keynote speech, “We need a general strike on the tenth of September.” He also said that if in coming years the France Insoumise is elected as the government, the role of the activists will not be to obey but “to be in revolt everywhere.”

Islamophobia was spoken of in many meetings and was central to Mélenchon’s keynote––something absolutely unheard of on the French Left. The FI is attacked everywhere in the right wing and left wing press for its principled stand against Islamophobia, and it is now recognized as the leading force which has brought about a sea change in left attitudes to Islamophobia in France. There were also a number of activists present, many of them Muslim, who were pushing for the FI to go further against Islamophobia and demand the abrogation of the 2004 law which bans Muslim headscarves in high schools (the FI is divided on this).

A series of meetings was organized on local politics, since the municipal elections, which happen every six years, will take place in March 2026. Six years ago, the FI was smaller and unable to stand in many towns. This year the plan is to stand in as many towns as possible. Some FI proposals, such as not allowing municipal police officers to be armed, are already hitting the headlines. The talks covered experiences of left councils today, from Naples and across Spain, historical examples of radical left local councils, and debates on specific challenges today, such as reversing the privatization of water supply, building social housing, and so on. Left mayors, who in France are local council chiefs, spoke at several debates 

Stands from various campaigns and political groups were present: Palestine groups, antifascist groups and others. Three far-left groups had their own stands, but the vast majority of revolutionary groups in France––3-4 of which have over a thousand activists and 5-6 with over a hundred––are haughtily dismissive of debating with the France Insoumise, and hardly ever even invite FI people to debate at the far-left summer schools.

While national press coverage on the summer school continues to be largely negative, with a huge smear campaign against the FI, portraying us as antisemitic fans of Putin, mesmerized by the charisma of Mélenchon, there were some more objective reports

All in all, it is a vibrant movement with tremendous potential––I have never been at a political event where the average age of the speakers was so young, though it definitely needs far more revolutionary Marxist input, in particular on the nature and processes of French imperialism.

Red Flag: The New A100 Autobahn — A Monument to Car Supremacy

In his weekly column, Nathaniel Flakin looks at Berlin’s antediluvian transport policy.


26/08/2025

As much as we like to think of our city as avant-garde, on Wednesday we will get a massive reminder that Berlin remains a backwater stuck firmly in the 1950s. At 14:00, politicians such as transport minister Patrick Schnieder (CDU) will cut the ribbon on a new inner-city freeway at a ceremony inside Estrel Hotel in Neukölln. Why not gather outside, on their beloved asphalt desert? Because this project is extremely unpopular, and there will be protests starting at 13:00.

The latest segment of the A100, made of 750,000 tons of steel and 650,000 cubic meters of concrete, is the most expensive Autobahn ever built: the 3.2 kilometers cost 720 million euros (2.3 times more than planned!), working out to 225,000 euros per meter. In other words, each meter of highway could have paid for an affordable housing unit. Instead, five perfectly good buildings with 100 apartments were demolished to make room for this tiny strip through Neukölln and Treptow.

When critics denounce a transport policy from the 1950s, that’s not hyperbole: the plan for a ring highway in Berlin literally dates back to the 1930s, with a first section completed in 1958. Now, 67 years later, the 16th segment is going online.

Catastrophe

From the first day, it’s going to be a catastrophe. If 85,000 cars race down this part of the A100 each day, as predicted, they will be spat out at Treptower Park with nowhere to go. The bridge across the Spree, Elsenbrücke, is currently being replaced, with just a single lane open until at least 2028.

Immediately, there will be demands for more Autobahn: A 17th segment of the A100, cutting a path of destruction through Friedrichshain toward Storkower Straße, is in planning. This would be even more absurd, as it would require tearing down a dozen clubs (though I don’t mind the idea of bulldozing pro-Zionist club ://about blank, the building should be preserved and turned into a less racist venue). 

A Friedrichshain freeway would require a double-decker tunnel under the narrow, historical Neue Bahnhofstraße, followed by a bridge over the Ring Center 2 shopping mall. Cost estimates of a billion euros seem hopelessly optimistic, since construction would take decades. Nonetheless, huge swaths of inner-city land are being kept empty for this pipe dream — with one study showing this could provide space for 8,000 apartments.

Induced Demand

Car lobbyists — known in Germany as Verkehrsminister:innen — argue that there is a fixed amount of traffic and it needs to go somewhere. But no serious urban planner believes this is true. Berlin is currently carrying out an unplanned experiment in what scientists call “induced demand.”

Back in March, a freeway bridge on the oldest part of the A100, in Charlottenburg next to the ICC, had to be closed and demolished. A road carrying 230,000 cars per day was suddenly reduced to one lane. Everyone expected a massive traffic jam in surrounding streets. Yet after a few days, all the cars just kind of disappeared, with numerous drivers choosing other means of transportation.

This is why new freeways never clear up traffic jams — roads don’t reduce traffic, but actually induce it. Berlin will offer yet more proof for this well-established scientific fact starting on Wednesday: the endless investments in car infrastructure will just mean more cars and more chaos. 

Hope

It’s embarrassing that our multicultural, rebellious, queer city is governed by a parochial, car-obsessed bumpkin like Kai Wegner, who commutes into the city each day from his sleepy village. It’s even more embarrassing that Berlin might be the only city in the Western world building new inner-city highways in the 21st century.

The CDU’s transport policy is not an abstract question of personal preferences: Wegner’s government has managed to increase the number of traffic fatalities by over 50 percent, up to 56 people last year. That is several dozen lives extinguished in the name of slightly faster travel for the privileged minority who use cars.

Germany’s car industry, largely owned by Nazi billionaires, is destroying the planet and our city in the name of maximizing profits. The CDU is their political wing. Every euro they spend on roads is a euro that’s missing for keeping the trains running.

Berlin’s history offers some hope. Back in the 1970s, the Red Island in Schöneberg was set to be torn down to make room for a six-lane monstrosity. Yet direct action was successful in stopping that Autobahn.

Just about every European metropolis is building bike lanes, expanding public transport, and opening up streets for people, instead of for cars. Maybe this is just a fantasy, but I imagine that with enough protests, we can drag Berlin’s rulers, kicking and screaming, into the 21st century.

Red Flag is a weekly opinion column on Berlin politics that Nathaniel has been writing since 2020. After moving through different homes, it now appears at The Left Berlin.

Standing in Solidarity with Palestinian Liberation and All Marginalized Voices

We need everyone on the streets. This fight is bigger than any one community

Trans Pride Berlin stands unequivocally with Palestinian liberation and in solidarity with all racialized communities fighting for justice and freedom. Our commitment to trans liberation cannot be separated from our commitment to global liberation.

To our LGBTQIA+ siblings, allies, and everyone who believes in justice: we urgently need you with us. When trans people are under attack (through state surveillance, legal restrictions, and violence) it threatens the freedom of all marginalized communities. When any of us are targeted, we all become less safe. Your presence at Trans Pride Berlin is not just solidarity; it’s self-defense for all our communities.

Learning from Our Past, Building Our Future

We acknowledge the harm caused by last year’s national flag policy, which silenced Palestinian voices at a time when solidarity was most needed. We failed our community, particularly those standing with Palestine, and we take full responsibility for that exclusionary decision. This year, we are rebuilding Trans Pride Berlin from the ground up (centering the voices and leadership of those most impacted by systemic oppression).

Trans Pride Berlin is stepping away from white feminism and homonationalism that have dominated our spaces and community for too long. We reject the sanitized politics that prioritize respectability over liberation, that center whiteness while tokenizing racialized voices, and that align with state power instead of challenging it. True trans liberation requires dismantling these systems, not reforming them.

Our Solidarity is International

We stand alongside the International Queer Pride and Community Dyke March, whose powerful statements on Palestinian liberation reflect our shared values. There can be no queer liberation without Palestinian liberation. There can be no trans freedom without racial justice. There can be no true pride while genocide and occupation continue.

Fighting All Forms of Oppression

We stand firmly against antisemitism, Islamophobia, anti-Blackness, and all forms of religious and ethnic hatred. We reject the weaponization of antisemitism accusations to silence legitimate criticism of Israeli state policies and Palestinian solidarity. True opposition to antisemitism means fighting all systems of oppression (including the occupation and genocide of Palestinian people).

We also acknowledge the voices of Jewish queer community members who stand in solidarity against occupation, racism, and antisemitism—their perspectives are an essential part of our movement.

Our anti-colonial politics must include a clear commitment to addressing anti-Blackness, which has long been central to systems of domination across the globe. These systems continue to impact many communities, and Black trans people, especially Black trans women; experience this harm at multiple intersections. Their lives, leadership, and liberation are essential to the broader struggle for justice. We cannot speak of freedom without centering those most affected by these overlapping forms of oppression.

Recognizing Patterns of Repression

We recognize that the same systems used to silence Palestinian voices in Germany are blueprints for silencing all marginalized communities, including queer and trans people. When states criminalize solidarity, ban symbols of resistance, and label liberation movements as threats, they create precedents that will inevitably be used against all of us who dare to resist.

Over the past year, our queer and trans siblings (especially racialized, Muslim, and Jewish community members) have been subjected to extreme police and state violence. We condemn this violence unequivocally. The targeting of our people for their identities, their solidarity, or their resistance exposes the lie that we live in a free and equal society.

This pattern extends to the German government’s proposed registry system for trans people seeking legal gender recognition (a dangerous violation of privacy rights that echoes Germany’s own dark history of registering and tracking marginalized communities). The state also threatens to withdraw the Selbstbestimmungsgesetz and appears ready to follow the UK and US in criminalizing us and stripping away our rights. Any system that creates lists of vulnerable people for state surveillance should alarm us all. We know where such registries lead, and we refuse to accept that trans people should be tracked and monitored by the state under any pretext. 

The fight for Palestinian freedom is inseparable from our fight for trans and queer liberation. State surveillance, whether targeting Palestinians or trans people, serves the same function: control, intimidation, and the systematic erosion of our rights to exist freely.

Our Commitment Moving Forward

This year’s Trans Pride Berlin will be:

  • Anti-colonial: Rejecting all forms of settler colonialism and occupation
  • Anti-racist: Centering the leadership of racialized trans people
  • Trans-feminist: Amplifying trans women’s voices and experiences
  • Pro-sex work: Supporting the full humanity and rights of sex workers
  • Disability justice-oriented: Creating accessible spaces for all bodies and minds

A Call to Action

We call on our community to join us in building a Pride that reflects our true politics (one that doesn’t shy away from global solidarity), that doesn’t sanitize our resistance, and that doesn’t abandon our most vulnerable community members for the comfort of respectability.

Get involved – we need you:

  • Register a bloc for your community (Black, SWANA, Asian, disabled, sex worker, trans fem, and more)
  • Give a speech or performance that centers our politics of liberation
  • Help with logistics – from marshaling to sound tech to accessibility coordination
  • Support organizing through social media, flyering, or community outreach

To our Palestinian trans and queer siblings: your liberation is our liberation. We see you, and we commit to standing with you. Let us unite our fight towards collective justice and freedom for us all.

To our racialized community members: your leadership is not just welcome. It is essential. Help us build something worthy of our collective power.

Trans liberation means liberation for all

Peace is not silence: Part 2

Continuing our conversation with voices from the Hiroshima Palestine Vigil and Nagasaki for Palestine


24/08/2025

A group of 17 people stand in front of the Hiroshima Atomic Bomb memorial holding various signs. There are candles and signs on the ground as well.

In the first part of our conversation, members of the Hiroshima Palestine Vigil reflected on the origins of their nightly gatherings, the reception they’ve received in the city, and their belief that peace must be redefined, not as the absence of war, but as a refusal to look away, wherever violence is taking place.

In this second part, the discussion turns to the deeper historical layers beneath Hiroshima’s “peace” narrative—layers formed not only by the memory of the atomic bombings, but also by Japan’s own history of imperialism and colonialism. Much of this history remains unspoken in official remembrance: Japan’s occupation of Korea, Taiwan, and much of Asia; its use of forced labor and sex slavery from across the region; and the discrimination that continued long after the Asia-Pacific War ended.

In Nagasaki, for example, tens of thousands of Koreans and Chinese were brought under colonial rule and forced to work in arms factories, mines, and shipyards. Many were killed in the atomic bombing, yet their stories remain marginal in national memory. Survivors were denied Japanese citizenship after the war, excluded from equal compensation, and often faced language barriers and bureaucratic hurdles that prevented them from receiving support. This selective remembrance—the centering of some victims while erasing others—shapes how Japan understands its past, and in turn, how it responds to violence in the present, most starkly the genocide in Gaza.

Here, the Vigil’s members—Rebecca Maria Goldschmidt, a Jewish and Filipino anti-Zionist artist and Sailor Kannako, an artist and clothing store clerk from Hiroshima; are joined by Lisa and another member of Nagasaki for Palestine (NFP). Together they draw parallels between the forgotten victims of Nagasaki and the silenced voices in Gaza, reflecting on how histories of both victimhood and perpetration must shape solidarity today.

Do you see similarities between what happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and what’s happening in Gaza, not only in the destruction, but also in how the victims are spoken about or potentially even forgotten?

Rebecca: There are many parallels simply in the everyday, desperate reality of the situation of Gaza and the aftermath of the bombs: the mass death, the lack of food, thousands of orphaned children, contamination, cultural and societal collapse, psychological and physical illness and disease, no work, the terrorization of civilian communities and the crushing of morale to force defeat. 

Additionally, even though they were used during wartime, the atomic bombs were part of the US weapons development and testing program and part of the 2,000+ nuclear weapons tests that were done worldwide. The US and Japanese governments also relentlessly studied the hibakusha up until this day. The data they gleaned from the effects of the bomb on the human body (and still do, as the studies continue) provides them with priceless data that continues to inform technological “progress”.

Palestine, as we know, is also a laboratory to develop and improve “battle-ready” weapons on a human population and document their impacts. What connects Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Gaza is not the fact that they are all “locations of bombings”, but the context of their destruction as part of a legacy of weapons technology development and testing, and the ideology of white supremacy that necessitates, designs, and enacts these horrors.

Japan’s own imperialism and settler-colonial endeavors during the war also parallel the occupation of Palestine. Japan has more in common with Israel than it wants to admit—the overt massacre of babies and children, intentional starvation, sexual violence, prisoner torture, etc. I don’t see the Hiroshima-Nagasaki victims as being forgotten at all, I see them as being deified and their stories utilized to justify re-militarization, despite struggling for decades to be seen and heard. I see the millions of victims of Japanese imperialism—1 million Filipinos, 2 million Vietnamese, 10–20 million Chinese, etc.— also being eclipsed by the stories of Hiroshima-Nagasaki victims. Even the Korean and Chinese hibakusha are erased by the Japanese victimhood narrative.

Most people in Japan don’t know the details of their own family’s participation in imperial war crimes, and the government actively advances historical revisionism. This is just one reason why we have seen such a rapid rise in anti-foreigner hatred and open xenophobia during Japan’s recent elections. 

Do you think confronting these erased histories could change how Japan responds to the genocide in Gaza or other struggles for justice today?

Rebecca: Japan has cultivated both a self and public image of pacifism, but with the 80th anniversary of the bombs, a lot of hidden stories are coming to light that are challenging this “nation of peace”.

I came to Japan to better understand the Japanese military occupation of the Philippines that I had heard about from my grandmother. Why was it that no one talked about it even if it was the most violent period in Filipino history? Most Japanese people I talked to had no idea there even was an occupation in the Philippines. That was shocking to me, so when the Gaza genocide started, it made sense that people ignored it. Of course within the anti-war movement there are many Japanese people who are confronting these issues head-on, whether around Okinawa or the sex slavery issue. I have a lot of respect for them as I also take responsibility for the shameful actions in my own zionist family history. I can see the overlap between people who acknowledge Japanese historical atrocity and can draw parallels to what is happening again in Gaza and in other colonial contexts.

Recently in Japan, politicians or famous people have been making revisionist comments, like the Battle of Okinawa “wasn’t that bad”, or that the rape of Nanking never happened. I think in order for any society—Israel, Japan or Germany—the first step toward “atonement” is acknowledging that these crimes are real. In the case of Gaza, however, denial continues, despite this being the most documented genocide in history.

Clearly both “Peace education” and “Holocaust education” systems have failed miserably. Even if people do know what happened, no one was taught what to do when it starts happening again—just look at the ICE kidnappings in the US or the poor treatment of migrant workers in Japanese detention.

In all these contexts, political education around state power, the roots of racism and ethno-supremacy, how “victimhood” is weaponized, necrocapitalism, the list goes on—all of this must be exposed alongside the images we see, otherwise we really are just on a carousel of repeated atrocities with more efficient technology every time. Just “knowing” is not enough for people to take action. There has to also be a sense of political agency and a culture of caring for other people who might not look or act like you, but whose lives are still inherently valuable.

Nagasaki’s victims included many Korean and Chinese forced laborers whose suffering is rarely centered in the city’s memorials. What do you think this says about whose suffering is recognized, and whose is left out, in Japan’s culture of remembrance?

Lisa from NFP: In Nagasaki, it is believed that around 20,000 Koreans and about 650 Chinese laborers were exposed to the atomic bomb. My grandmother recalled that Korean laborers also worked outside the weapons factory she was in, but she had no idea what became of them after the bombing.

At the same time, the hypocenter of the atomic bombing in Nagasaki, Urakami, was located about 3km from the center of Nagasaki city. It was home to many Kakure Kirisitan, hidden Christians, who had preserved their faith in secret through over 250 years of persecution. However, as reconstruction efforts prioritized the city center, many of them were left behind, unable to receive adequate medical care or compensation due to poverty, social discrimination, and isolation. 

In Nagasaki, there are relatively few testimonies from Christians in Urakami who survived the atomic bombing. Testimony collection and oral history projects have often focused on survivors living in the city center or those who were more socially visible, leaving many marginalized voices unheard. I believe this represents a significant difference in the culture of memory between Hiroshima, where the city center was the hypocenter, and Nagasaki.

Anonymous from NFP: Many Chinese and Korean people who were forced to work in Mitsubishi’s arms factories and related facilities in Nagasaki had been kidnapped by the Japanese army during the occupation. I can only imagine how difficult it must have been for their families to find out about their situation after the bombing.

There are separate memorials for Chinese and Korean victims in the corners of the Peace Memorial Park, and ceremonies for them are held separately. There is also a separate museum that exhibits not only information about the bombing victims but also the crimes of the Japanese army in the Asia-Pacific region before and during the war.

As a Japanese person who grew up in downtown Tokyo in the 1980s, I did not learn these facts in school. I hope that the standard Japanese education curriculum will teach them, so that we can truly regret what must be regretted, instead of trying to forget.


​​In light of this selective remembrance, how do you think we can build genuine solidarity today? Not just symbolically, but in material or political terms? For example, how should solidarity with Palestinians be demonstrated beyond words or gestures?

Sailor Kannako: To me, solidarity means to empathize with others and to keep acting in ways that complement each other’s shortcomings. To do this, I think it’s necessary to face our own experiences and continue to speak in our own words, with our own feelings, so that emotions such as regret and anger—the triggers of empathy—don’t fade away. I have seen the suffering of the Palestinian people ignored and misunderstood by the international community for many years.

In Japan, when women experience sexual violence, their complaints are often not believed, and it’s often said the victim was at fault. I’ve had a similar experience, and I imagined that Palestinians have felt a similar deep regret and anger. That feeling made it impossible for me not to take action. If the world that once hurt me is now hurting someone else, my wounds will never heal.

People in Gaza are now asking, “What crime have we committed?” I think those who were burned by the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki must have been filled with that same regret and anger. My experience may be insignificant compared to their pain, but it’s connected. I believe that only by trusting our own feelings and summoning the courage to speak about Gaza in our own words can we build strong bonds of empathy and create lasting, enormous solidarity.

What do you wish people outside Japan understood about Japan’s relationship to Palestine, or about protest in Japan in general?

R: Protest in Japan is usually considered a nuisance, laughable, something done by irrational people. The Japanese public is also generally unaware of the reality of what is happening in Palestine and Gaza. Therefore, the people who are taking the risk to speak up, often against the wishes of their families, workplaces, and communities, are actually pushing up against massive societal and cultural pressure.

No one is a hero, the genocide is still ongoing, and I still think we could do much more from Japan—but the people who have fought bravely for Palestine in Japan against their own set of constraints do work very hard. Everyone tells us about the one guy in Tokyo who stands alone every day on the street yelling about the genocide. Yes, he’s awesome, but the story is misleading because he’s not alone! In Tokyo, there is a strong solidarity movement led by Palestinians, and there is an extensive network throughout Japan, even in very rural areas, that is cross-cultural, intergenerational, and interfaith, trying its best to be intersectional and inclusive.

Every movement has its internal struggles, but we are proud to be part of a truly unique moment in history. The movement for Palestine in Japan did not start on Oct. 7, there have been decades of researchers, artists, students, and activists who have supported and engaged with Palestinians and I feel grateful to be part of this lineage. We are standing with the Palestinian people and the entire world against domination, fascism, and up against a lot of our own ghosts. But we continue to fight in the tradition of many of our ancestors, from the anti-war and anti-nuclear movements, the student, women’s, queer, and environmental movements, and other decolonial peoples’ struggles for dignity, equality, justice and liberation.

Finally, are there any ways people can support your groups?

Follow us on Instagram @hiroshima_palestine_vigil and @nagasakiforpalestine

Buy the zines written by young people in Gaza that we have translated into Japanese:
Gazagazagaza.base.shop

Make a donation to one of the projects we have been supporting:
@GazaSoupKitchen
Challenge Classes
Eman Al-haj Ali GoFundMe

Never stop talking about Palestine!