The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

The Last Colony in Africa Fights On

Report from a delegation trip to the refugee camps in Western Sahara in April 2024


04/09/2024

In April 2024, an international delegation (anarchists, communists, radical leftists, climate and ecological movements, etc.) of around 25 people travelled to refugee camps in Algeria. The delegation members mostly live in Germany, but some come from Europe, Asia, Africa and South America (Abya Yala). The camp is administered by the Frente Polisario (Frente Popular para la Liberación de Saguía el Hamra y Río de Oro – Popular Front for the Liberation of Saguía el Hamra and Río de Oro) and is officially recognized by the UN. The purpose of the delegation was to learn about the Sahrawis’ struggle for independence against the occupation of Western Sahara by Morocco and to show their solidarity.

The Sahrawis’ struggle for liberation dates back to the 16th and 17th centuries, when they organized resistance against the first Portuguese and Dutch invaders, as well as against the French. The struggle against the French Meharist army from 1912 to 1936, the uprising against the Spanish colonial power in 1958 in Rgueya, Teguel, El Arghoub, Ausserd, Edschera and the uprising (Zemla Intifada) in El Aauín on June 17, 1970 are also worthy of mention.

The Frente Polisario, founded in 1973, fought for the independence of Western Sahara and proclaimed the DARS (Democratic Arab Republic of Sahara) on February 27, 1976 after the withdrawal of the colonial power Spain (1884-1975). As part of the Madrid Agreement of November 14, 1975, six days before Franco’s death, Western Sahara was divided up and occupied by Morocco and Mauritania in violation of international law. Decolonization had previously been decided by the UN in 1960 and 1965. The Frente Polisario put up armed resistance against the occupation. 

Mauritania withdrew in 1979. However, a ceasefire was only agreed with Morocco in 1991, after 16 years of war. Since then, 80% of Western Sahara has been occupied by Morocco, while the Frente Polisario controls 20%. Morocco erected a 2720-kilometre-long wall between the occupied and liberated territory, which is guarded by over 150,000 soldiers and contaminated with up to 10 million landmines.

Following a decision on 29 April 1991, the UN mission MINURSO (Mission des Nations Unies pour l’organization d’un référendum au Sahara occidental) was set up with a mandate to hold a referendum within six months to decide on the status of Western Sahara and its independence. However, the Moroccan state refused to cooperate for over 30 years, and faced no consequences from the UN. In the course of Morocco’s occupation, many inhabitants of Western Sahara have been displaced. A large number of these refugees (around 150,000 to 200,000) are now living in five self-managed camps near the Algerian city of Tindouf. After Morocco broke the ceasefire agreements in November 2020, the Frente Polisario resumed armed resistance against the occupation.

Our delegation was hosted by families in the Smara refugee camp. Our group’s daily programme consisted of visits to various political and cultural organizations, like the youth organization UJSARIO, as well as to self-governing structures of the camps, clinics, government institutions, the University of Tifariti, the Simon Bolivar School, the journalists’ association UPES, human rights organizations, libraries, museums and the women’s organization UNMS.

The visit to the Sahrawi Red Crescent food depot documented the daily dependence on UN aid deliveries – which recently received a 20% cut to the total budget.

Due to the extreme living conditions in the desert (which can reach up to 50 degrees in the summer), growing food is extremely difficult and there is high dependence on the UN’s WFP (World Food Program), which mainly supplies rice, flour, sugar and oil, but hardly any vegetables or fruit. There have already been two major shortages, and in 2008 there were more serious hunger problems. Around 87% of the camp residents suffer from iron deficiency, and 11% have severe iron deficiency due to an unbalanced diet. In addition, 7 to 10% of children under the age of six have been diagnosed with malnutrition. The UN and the international community are partly responsible for this, as they are cutting food budgets and failing to improve the precarious supply situation.

The visits to CONASADH (La Comisión Nacional Saharaui de Derechos Humanos – The National Sahrawi Human Rights Commission) and AFAPREDESA (Asociación de Familiares de Presos y Desaparecidos Saharauis – Association of Families of Sahrawi Prisoners and Disappeared Persons) made us understand the massive human rights violations committed by the Moroccan government against Sahrawi activists.

The result is a total of around 30,000 political prisoners and detainees, arrested between 1975 to 2024. Of those, 46 are currently political prisoners, 90% of whom are in Moroccan prisons. There have also been around 4,500 disappearances (with over 500 from 1975 to 1977 alone), 445 of whom are still being sought today. This is all in addition to torture, arrests, interrogations, attacks and the prevention of demonstrations. 

The uncovering of mass graves of murdered Sahrawis during the 1976-1991 war is an important part of the documentation work. In 2013, a Basque association also provided support in the exhumation and subsequent re-entombment of bones found. 

Of the 15 mass graves discovered so far, some were also located in tourist centers. 

Since 2020, the Moroccan army has carried out massive drone attacks on the civilian population in the liberated area, which have so far led to a number of deaths (at least 89 as of April 2024). As a result, many of the approximately 20,000 to 30,000 people living there have been displaced – most of whom have fled to the camps. 

In addition, there are victims of landmines buried by the Moroccan army along the 2720 km long wall, which explode when they are stepped on. 2,600 of these victims live in the camps and some organizations support them with prostheses.

AFAPREDESA, which was founded in 1989, is banned in the Moroccan-occupied Western Sahara and operates clandestinely there. It has over 700 members and is supported in particular by women, who make up the majority of the organization and do most of the work. A clear criticism was voiced about the inactivity of the Red Cross, with which there has been hardly any contact after the discovery of new mass graves in 2013.

The Red Cross, which is also represented in the camps, does not stand up for the Sahrawi political prisoners, for whom the situation is particularly difficult. All of them are in poor health, many suffer from kidney and heart problems or rashes, and many are mistreated and tortured. They have no access to education, health care or contact with their family members. For all these reasons, there have already been several hunger strikes by prisoners, and international support has so far been minimal.

The meeting with the women’s organization UNMS (Union Nacional de Mujeres Saharauis – National Union of Sahrawi Women), which was founded in 1974 and has over 10,000 members, underlines the immense importance of independent women’s organizations. The camp structures were largely set up by women and are still managed by them in central positions today. The UNMS is active in four areas: in occupied Western Sahara, liberated Western Sahara, Algeria and the Sahrawi diaspora. It’s organized in a national congress that elects 66 women as representatives at regular intervals and is involved in various subject areas.

Women who were involved in the armed struggle before 1991 and are part of the liberation army of the Frente Polisario are today at the forefront of the resistance, especially in the occupied part of Western Sahara. They make up 42% of the delegates in the national congress, the highest proportion in the entirety of Africa. 

They are also represented in the Socialist International, the African Women’s Association, the Pan-African Congress and other anti-fascist and anti-imperialist organizations. In every Wilaya (camp town) there is a women’s shelter. However, according to one of the women we interviewed, “there are still macho ideas or a way of thinking”. Compared to other countries, however, the number of cases of violence against women is lower. Internalized gender roles, such as in housework, are also a problem. After this meeting and with other organized women, it became clear to all of us that it is the women who play the central role in the social and political self-administration structure of all 5 refugee camps. Special respect was paid to the Kurdish women in the armed struggle as an expression of international solidarity.

A central point of the visit was the Resistance Museum, which took us through the history of the resistance and liberation struggle against the colonial occupations of Spain and Morocco. The captured  Moroccan army war material on display was produced by Germany, and in the last ten years, Germany has supplied armaments worth over 200 million euros. These include surveillance technology (ground radar) for border security, unmanned aerial vehicles, on-board weapon control systems, parts for cannon ammunition and communications technology. Arms exports from Germany, the EU and the USA contribute significantly to the maintenance of the occupation by Morocco.

The on-site visit to SMACO (Sahrawi Mine Action Coordination Office) also showed us the involvement of international companies in the production and supply of drones. Drones used by the Moroccan army and their technology come from Israel (e.g. from the Elbit group), Turkey, the UAE, China, the USA and also Germany. The TB2-Bayraktar drone from Turkey, which is also used in Kurdistan, flies with electro-optical sensors and laser technology from a German company (Hensoldt in Taufkirchen) as well as with laser-guided missiles based on warheads supplied by TDW Wirksysteme GmbH from Schrobenhausen.

However, German companies such as Siemens, HeidelbergCement (Materials), Thyssen-Krupp and others are also involved in exploitation through the extraction and supply of raw materials, energy production and economic cooperation with the occupying regime in Morocco. Siemens supplied and installed 22 wind turbines for the 50 MW Foum el Oued wind farm, which came online in occupied Western Sahara in 2013. Thysen-Krupp is involved in phosphate mining and HeidelbergCement is involved in two cement factories via a Moroccan subsidiary (Cimenst du Maroc). More detailed information on the involvement of German and European companies in the exploitation of Western Sahara can be found on the website of the organization Western Sahara Resource Watch.

Finally, we were able to conduct a series of interesting interviews, including with Embarka Bumajruta, one of the founders of the Frente Polisario, and with Elghalia Djimi, human rights activist and former political prisoner in Western Sahara, which we will publish at a later date. 

After the trip, some took part in the annual FiSahara International Film Festival in Wilaya Ausserd. The prizes at this year’s festival under the motto ‘resistir es vencer (to resist is to win)’ went to the Palestinian feature film 200 Meters, the documentary Insumisas about women’s resistance in the Western Sahara and Igualada about the Afro-Colombian activist and politician Francia Márquez.

The existence of the camps since 1975 and life under the most adverse conditions made us permanently aware of the forced expulsion of the Sahrawi population by the Moroccan state. We experienced an unbroken will to return and desire for liberation from the occupation. We heard daily that life in exile was only temporary and that the resistance would continue until the liberation of Western Sahara.

As internationalists, we must support this resistance with all the means at our disposal. We must also denounce and fight colonial imperialist structures, as well as state governments and multinational corporations both here in Germany and the EU that profit from the occupation of Morocco and thus enable and maintain it.

  • We stand for the process of decolonization worldwide.
  • Freedom for Western Sahara, freedom for Palestine, freedom for Kurdistan, freedom for Kanaky.
  • Freedom for all those oppressed and condemned by colonization in this world.

 

Team of the delegation trip April 2024

August 2024

 

Literature tips:

Further Photos

Sahrawi Women at the Filmfestival Fi Sahara 2024

 

Refugee Camp Smara in Algeria

 

Traditional Tea pot
Demonstration in Berlin 2024, starting Neptunbrunnen

 

Founder and leader of Frente Polisario , El-Ouali Mustapha Sayed. Mural in the refugee camp

 

Berlin mayor insists on removing statue for victims of sexual slavery

Protest planned to save the “Comfort Women” statue


02/09/2024

In 2020, The Left Berlin reported on the threat to Moabit’s “comfort woman” statue, also known as the Peace Statue or ‘Ari’, after Stephan von Dassel, then mayor of Berlin-Mitte, ordered its removal following pressure from the Japanese government. We also interviewed affected Japanese and Korean activists about what the statue, which commemorates East Asian victims of sexual violence during the Second World War, meant to them.

A lively campaign saved the statue, which you can still visit at the corner of Bremerstraße and Birkenstraße. But it is under threat once more after Berlin’s mayor Kai Wegner (CDU) announced in May that the Peace Statue would be removed. 

Wegner’s announcement followed a meeting with Japanese foreign minister Yoko Kamikawa. At the meeting, Wegner dismissed the statue as being “one-sided”. and said: “it is important that we come to changes.” He also met Tokyo governor Yuriko Koike. Koike’s attitude towards Koreans is hardline, even for Japanese politicians, as she actively denies that Koreans were massacred after the 1923 Great Tokyo earthquake.

A Damning Report

On August 3rd, Berlin-Brandenburg Broadcasting (RBB) published a report entitled Funding of Project on Sexualized Violence Fails Due to Political Interference. The report explained how women and children, primarily from Korea and China, were referred to as “comfort women” as an attempt to hide the fact that they were, in fact, forced into sexual slavery. Up to 200,000 women and girls were sent to so-called “comfort stations” where they were raped several times every day.

As a result of the funding rejection, the Korea Verband will also no longer be able to continue its youth education project “Sit Next to Me!”, which has been running for three years. This project aims to educate young people about sexual violence in wartime by focusing on the history of the Japanese military’s “comfort women” and the movement surrounding the Peace Statue, while also drawing connections to unresolved historical issues in Germany.

RBB talked to  Nataly Jung-Hwa Han from Berlin’s Korea Verband about the project, quoting her as saying: “what the project meant for us is empowerment, because the comfort women have broken the silence.”

RBB says that it has compelling evidence that the Korea Verband’s application for funding from the Berlin Project Fund for Cultural Education was rejected due to direct intervention by Kai Wegner because he feared a conflict with the Japanese government. 

For its part, the Japanese embassy invited several members of the funding panel to a meal in a five star hotel to attempt to encourage them to vote against the educational project behind the statue. After the panel decided to fund the project anyway, Wegner intervened. The statue should now be removed at the end of September.

Civil society worldwide has expressed deep regret over the findings of the RBB report. There is great disappointment that this initiative was derailed by political intervention after the curriculum had already been coordinated with several schools and was ready for implementation. There is also outrage that the decades-long work of the Korea Verband has been suppressed without its contribution to German society being acknowledged.

Concern grows following the victory of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) in the Berlin municipal elections, as support has been withdrawn from the Korea Verband and other organizations primarily run by those with migration backgrounds. This situation has raised fears that Germany and Japan, the two Axis powers of World War II, could be returning to the past.

Protest Rally

As a response to Wegner’s interference, the initiative “People at the Statue of Peace” are organizing another protest rally “Erinnerung [Memories] for Sale!?” at Neptunenbrunnen near Alexanderplatz. The rally is protesting against the political interference of the Berlin Mayor in the Korea Verband’s application for funding for an educational project on gender-based violence.

The organizers of the rally join the voices of global civil society in calling on the German government to recognize that the issue of the Japanese military’s “comfort women” is a serious human rights violation, representing a continuation of colonialism and the oppression of women, and to no longer support the Japanese government’s efforts to deny and revise history.

The protest demands the following:

Preservation of the Statue of Peace, Ari: The Statue of Peace must stay! Despite broad support from civil society and the positive decisions of the District Assembly (BVV), the statue is still under threat. District Mayor Stefanie Remlinger has stated that there is no legal basis for preserving the statue, but we insist that the voice of the victims of sexualized violence and the citizens of Berlin must be heard.

Protecting democracy and the culture of remembrance: It is unacceptable that political influence and economic interests are undermining the culture of remembrance in Berlin. The Japanese embassy tried to influence jury members of the project fund to decide against educational projects such as “Sit next to me”. When this failed, Kai Wegner personally prevented the continuation of the project. We demand that educational projects and monuments that deal with the memory of historical injustices be protected regardless of economic interests.

Since 2017, Yuriko Koike, the mayor of Tokyo, has refused to send a letter of condolence as part of the commemoration ceremony for the Korean victims of the massacre after the Great Tokyo Earthquake (1923) and has actively censored artworks that deal with the subject. Despite these facts, Kai Wegner continues to do business with her.

Investigation and political consequences: We call on the Berlin Senate to thoroughly investigate these incidents and respect the decisions of the expert jury. Kai Wegner must focus on the needs of Berlin’s citizens instead of using his political influence for the revisionist Japanese government. District Mayor Stefanie Remlinger should reject the pressure from Wegner and the Japanese government and speak out clearly in favor of preserving the peace statue.

 Victim protection instead of perpetrator protection: We demand that the protection of victims of sexualized violence be given priority and that educational and awareness-raising work for young people be given greater support.

Aiko Okamoto, one of the organisers of the rally told theleftberlin: “Many people have already proven that the Statue of Peace stands for real peace – peace without colonialism and sexualised violence. This is no longer just a sculpture but a community. You can’t just put up a place like this with money, you have to work together constantly.

This hard-won place is now balanced with the economic interests by by Kai Wegner. This is justified by Japan’s revisionist view of history. With this rally, we want to emphasise once again that the Statue of Peace is a symbol of cohesion. 

On September 8th, we will be showing a film which makes it clear how Japanese right-wing actors trivialise the Japanese empire and thus despise the ‘comfort women’ once again. We in Berlin do not bow to this hatred but stand together for justice for ‘comfort women’ and the Statue of Peace.”

Protest Rally – Remembrance for Sale!? For the preservation of the Statue of Peace Ari and for democracacy. Thursday, 5th September, 5pm, Neptunenbrunnen.

Film and Discussion: Shusenjo: The main battleground of the comfort women issue. Sunday, 8th September, 5.20pm, Sinema Transtopia, Lindowerstraße 20/22.

Sign the petition at change.org

Berlin’s mayor loves antisemites, chapter 713

Kai Wegner, Berlin’s conservative mayor, recently embraced the antisemitic conspiracy theorist Elon Musk. But Wegner’s relationship to Berlin’s former interior senator Heinrich Lummer raises even more questions.


01/09/2024

Heinrich Lummer, West Berlin’s interior senator from 1981 to 1986, has largely been forgotten. At most, a scandal or two from the conservative politician’s time in office has remained in the city’s collective memory. For years, the staunch anti-communist had an affair with an agent from East Germany’s Ministry for State Security (Stasi), making himself vulnerable to blackmail. In 1981, Lummer ordered the eviction of eight squats, during which the 19-year-old squatter Klaus-Jürgen Rattay was pushed under the wheels of a bus and died. A handmade memorial plaque in the sidewalk at Potsdamer Straße 125 still commemorates his death. Lummer’s career came to an end in 1986 due to a realty scandal. It was later revealed that the right-wing hardliner had allegedly donated thousands of marks to right-wing extremists in 1971.

Today, one influential Berlin politician thinks this resume deserves admiration. After Lummer’s death in 2019, Kai Wegner wrote: “He was a strong personality in the Berlin CDU.” Wegner said Lummer was “unforgotten”: “Many will remember him as someone who consistently enforced internal security and order,” the Facebook post reads. “This didn’t just win him friends, but it showed his clear stance.” Today, the writer of that obituary is mayor of Berlin.

Lummer stood out with one topic in particular since the end of the 1990s: his hatred of Jews. In 1997, Lummer spoke out against Jewish immigration to the Federal Republic of Germany in the Ostpreußenblatt, today called the Preußische Allgemeine Zeitung. The country already had too many foreigners — and its foreign policy on questions relating to Israel was largely “determined by others.”

Lummer’s antisemitism was so clear that he was denied entry to Israel in 1998. The following year, in an interview with the right-wing newspaper Junge Freiheit, he said the Berlin Holocaust memorial had only been built due to pressure from the “American East Coast.” In another interview, he wondered if forced labor under the Nazis had really been “so terrible and low-paid.” After all, “there has always been forced labor in the context of war.” When CDU politician Martin Hohmann (now AfD) gave an antisemitic speech in 2003, Lummer was one of the initiators of a solidarity declaration.

Further right-wing bugaboos completed Lummer’s world view. In 1999, again in the Ostpreußenblatt, he wrote that the German people were in danger of disappearing due to mass immigration, encouraged by foreign powers. Today, this far-right conspiracy theory is known as the “Great Replacement.” In 2001, Lummer signed a petition in support of Götz Kubitschek, today an ideologue of the neo-fascist Right, and in 2006, he signed another petition for Junge Freiheit.

None of this is a secret. Lummer’s Wikipedia page in German contains an entire section on his antisemitism. How does Wegner respond?

A spokesperson said that the mayor had paid tribute to Lummer due to his folksy style and his commitment to internal security and order. Wegner did not share Lummer’s “views on Israel” then or now. “We do not tolerate antisemitism, racism, or other hateful ideologies in Berlin — neither on the streets nor at universities and other parts of the city.” The question of whether Wegner had ever criticized his mentor’s antisemitism went unanswered.

Wegner has never been hesitant to level accusations of antisemitism. When the Israeli film maker Yuval Abraham gave a speech at the Berlinale calling for equal treatment for Israelis and Palestinians in the West Bank, using the term “apartheid,” Wegner called this an “unacceptable relativization.” When students, including Jewish students, occupied a building a Humboldt University, Wegner warned of “lawless spaces for antisemites and terrorists.” Wegner’s cultural senator, Joe Chialo of the CDU, is currently trying to close a cultural center because it provided space for the association Jewish Voice — which is also “antisemitic”. 

In March, Wegner had himself photographed with Telsa boss Elon Musk, who has been criticized widely for antisemitic conspiracy theories. Further in the past, we find controversial statements by Wegner himself. According to the taz newspaper, in 2000, Wegner, then the Berlin chairman of the CDU’s youth organization Junge Union, called for young people to finally develop a “healthy relationship with the nation.” The newspaper report quotes indirectly from the then 28-year-old Wegner: “If too much is taught about the ‘12 years’, this could also generate a backlash.” Some might call this an unacceptable relativization.

This is no exception for the CDU. The author of the Nazis’ Nuremberg Laws, Hans Globke, became the right-hand man of CDU boss Konrad Adenauer in 1953 — his portrait still hangs in the Federal Chancellory. The heirs of Nazi war criminals give large donations to the CDU. Horst Seehofer, a former interior minister from the CDU’s sister party CSU, supported a historical institute that denied the facts of the Holocaust for years, as the newspaper SZ reported. It would seem that the CDU has a great tolerance for antisemitism — as long as it is from right-wing Germans.

This story was first published in German in the newspaper nd on August 26. Translation by the author. The last paragraph was added.

“We must be discussing different forms of ownership”

Interview with Linda Holmes, tenant lawyer from Brooklyn


31/08/2024

Hello Linda. Could you start by introducing yourself?

I’m Linda Holmes. I am a lifelong New Yorker, and I live in Brooklyn. I professionally represent tenants in court, preventing evictions and bringing cases against the landlord about necessary repairs. 

Outside of my work, I work with New York City Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) in their tenant organizing work. We are working to have a city wide tenant’s group and setting up local groups in different parts of New York. I live in Flatbush, Brooklyn, and we have a DSA chapter there. 

I also work with a couple of  autonomous tenant unions which don’t have any paid staff. I do trainings, give advice and do some organizing. One group I work with is Brooklyn Eviction Defense, and I’m wearing their t-shirt today (see cover photo).

Can you say something about the state of renting in Brooklyn at the moment? Has it changed in the last few years?

There’s a constant pressure of rising rents and displacement. New York has rent stabilization, which means that there are limits on how much rents can be increased for some. But rules for protected tenants have been increasingly cut back, and fewer and fewer tenants are protected by rent stabilization. 

There is a movement called Good Cause Eviction, which is trying to limit how much landlords can raise the rent for tenants who are not protected by rent stabilization. We fought for five years, and have just succeeded. In April, we won Good Cause Eviction to cover more tenants. 

But there are a lot of exceptions to this new rule. Many tenants are still not covered. A lot of exceptions for smaller landlords were built into the law.

Brooklyn used to be known as the part of New York for people who couldn’t afford to live in Manhattan. Who lives in Brooklyn at the moment?

I was born and raised in Manhattan. I’m now 54 years old. When I was growing up, Manhattan was by far the most expensive, and, if you couldn’t afford to live in Manhattan, you would live in one of the outer boroughs: Brooklyn, Queens, Bronx, or Staten Island.  In my lifetime, Brooklyn has completely exploded, and rents have increased dramatically. 

There has been decades of pressure to displace older tenants, poorer tenants, tenants who are Black and Brown, tenants who are immigrants. There’s been immense displacement pressures around long standing tenants, and it really varies by neighborhood. 

Brooklyn is an enormous borough. It has neighborhoods like Williamsburg, which has insane, hyper gentrification. And on the other side, neighborhoods like Brownsville and East New York, where the gentrification pressures were not as significant. These neighborhoods remain relatively poor. They also experience displacement and rent increases, but not as great.

I live in Flatbush, which is somewhere in between. Flatbush is a very interesting neighborhood. It is where Bernie Sanders came from. In the time when Bernie was growing up, it was predominantly a Jewish-American neighborhood. In the 50s, 60s, and 70s, a lot of people came from the Caribbean, and so there is a strong Caribbean-Haitian-Jamaican influence. 

In the 2000s a lot of young, new renters came to Flatbush because they couldn’t afford other places, so there is pressure to move out the older Caribbean neighbors. Landlords want to rent to people who can pay more money. 

How much do you think there’s a racial element to the evictions? Is it simply that Black and Brown people tend to be poorer, or is it more than that?

I think it is a bit of both. If you own an apartment building, the more white tenants you have, the more white tenants you are going to attract. So social racism plays a role.

Most landlords don’t really care who is living in the building. It’s really about the money. They want to charge the highest rents. But the money is tied to larger issues of class and race in New York and in Brooklyn. It’s pretty intense.

We’ve talked about the bad things. What are you doing to try and change them for the better?

I have been doing a series of tenant trainings, because a lot of tenants are covered by rent stabilization, but not told about the new laws. Many do not understand the importance of these protections. Rent stabilization means that the rent can only be raised a certain amount, and landlords are required to offer a renewal lease. 

A lot of tenants are afraid that if they complain, they will be evicted. We explain how a landlord cannot just raise your rent to any amount if you complain, or if they don’t like you, or if they just want more money. 

We also explain how to make complaints, which is a very complicated process in New York City. We have a single phone number to call for all city services, whether it’s a parking ticket or a leak in your roof. If you want to complain that there’s garbage or rats, or even if a street light is out, there’s one number.  And they do keep records of what’s happening, which is also good.

But once a complaint has been made, there are problems. An inspector is sent out either from the buildings or the housing tenant agency. If the inspector comes and nobody happens to be there because there’s no appointment, the case is closed, and that’s the end of it. That’s problem one. 

Problem two is that inspectors are not very well paid, and there’s been a lot of turnover. We are living in New York City under an austerity mayor. We have been fighting budget cutbacks in every area. There are big fights around cutting back libraries and schools, but there is not such a big fight around cutting back the agencies that do these inspections. And the inspections are only a small part of what the agencies do. So even funding the agency wouldn’t necessarily result in more inspections.

This means that sometimes the inspector isn’t very well prepared to find out what all the problems are in an apartment, or even to address the problems that the tenant has called about. There’s a disconnect there between the complaints and the actual finding of violations. 

Landlords also sometimes pay off inspectors because their salaries are not very good. That’s a third problem. And a fourth problem comes when a violation is issued. There is no real punishment for that. There are technically fines, but the city does not collect them. I cannot explain why.

If a tenant wants to take the next step, they can go to court. If you are successful in your court case, the court will order the landlord to make repairs. But landlords ignore the court order because there is no fine, and you have to go back to court again and say the landlord is in contempt for failing to make these repairs.

One thing you can do is withhold your rent and ask for the court to find that you are not required to pay the entire amount based on the conditions In the apartment. Even then, the penalties are often insufficient if you win, which means you have a trial, days of court that you have to take off from work if you win, and what is called an abatement where you don’t have to pay all of the rent. 

But even if you have no hot water, this is not sufficient for a full abatement. You still will have to pay some of your rent. To me, you should not have to pay any rent if you have no heat and no hot water.

Who is organizing the help for tenants going through this horrible process? Is it just individual lawyers, or is there some sort of organization behind it?

There are a number of nonprofits in New York City that have done this work for decades, primarily preventing evictions. Getting repairs made can be unfulfilling, as it’s a great deal of effort for very little reward, and we are paid by the city for each case we do. This means that the organization I work for has an interest in successful results that aren’t that time consuming. There is constant pressure on the funding in New York City. 

A few years ago, the city passed a law saying that everyone should get a lawyer, but then they didn’t fund it sufficiently. And then the pandemic happened, which had a gigantic effect in New York. We had an eviction moratorium for years where there were no evictions at all. So there wasn’t a lot of need for the law at first. But then there was a flood of eviction cases.

There is also a tenant organizing movement in NYC that has been gaining strength. Tenants are learning to work together to help support one another and develop a sense of solidarity against their common nemesis: the landlord. NYC has a rich tradition of tenant organizing dating back over a hundred years. But, there was a period that tenant organizing was not nearly as strong as it should have been. The last 5-10 years has seen an incredible surge of interest in tenant organizing and developing tenant power. 

So it sounds like winning legal arguments is only a small part of what you’re having to do. You’re also having to put pressure on governments.

When I started, there were maybe 100-200 attorneys in the city who did the work I do. Now, I’m guessing it’s probably 10 times that. There’s been a substantial increase, which is good, but the bulk of the work that we do actually relates to a different problem. 

In New York City, our welfare system provides an extremely minimal amount of funding for housing. So if you are eligible for welfare, you get $450 for a family of four people. That’s insane, and that amount hasn’t changed in 30 years. Twenty years ago, my organization started a lawsuit, and the upshot of it is that if you are facing eviction, you can get a higher amount, but only if you’re facing eviction. 

So you can’t just start looking for an apartment. You have to have an apartment that you’re going to lose. This means that at least 50% of the work that we do is trying to get the money from the welfare system to pay for people’s arrears and to sometimes help them get continued money in the future.

What’s your relationship to social movements which might be making similar demands from a non-legal perspective?

There are limits on what my organization can do in terms of their advocacy. My organization does advocate for improvements to tenant protections, but I think for the most part, they’re just not aligned with social movements.

Most of my coworkers have a very high caseload, and it’s very traumatic because our work is almost entirely with families who are facing eviction. We are constantly talking with families who are frightened they are going to lose their home. That is the bulk of our work. For many people, it’s all they can handle to be doing their day job. 

For me, I couldn’t do it any longer if I wasn’t engaged in trying to figure out how it could be different and better.

In your spare time, you’re a member of the DSA. In Europe, we haven’t heard much from the DSA in the last couple of years. How is the DSA doing, and what’s its contribution to the housing movements?

I can’t speak at all for the national DSA, but I’m pretty involved with it here in New York City, and I’m very involved with my local chapter. In New York City, the DSA has been an important part of the coalition that started doing a bunch of legislative work around making rent stabilization stronger, getting the Good Cause Eviction passed, and the right to an attorney. 

Probably everywhere and in every social movement, there is a disconnect between the people who do work on the ground and those who are doing larger legislative advocacy. That has been a real struggle in the New York City DSA for a few years now, where folks who are engaged in tenant organizing on the ground are more aligned with abolition of private property and landlords. They are activists, and are therefore critical of some of the compromises that folks who are working on the policy side feel like they have to make.

Do you think that the coming election is going to affect housing rights in the States and in Brooklyn?

One of the very interesting things is that, right before Biden decided not to run again, he sort of proposed the possibility of starting to have some nationwide rent controls. To me, Brooklyn is the harbinger of what has now happened nationwide. There is a problem of homelessness and a lack of affordable housing, so people are paying such a substantial portion of their income on rent. 

Kamala Harris has re-enunciated that she is in support of rent control, but is it going to happen? I don’t know, but if we have a President Trump again, it is definitely not going to be on the table. It is not insignificant that Trump is a New York City landlord and comes from a New York City landlord family. 

In really important ways, the landlords in New York City think that private property is freedom to do whatever you want. But in actuality, Donald Trump, like any other landlord, benefited immensely from government contracts and the basic things that a state provides: sewage and roads and so forth. 

He also specifically benefited from state permissions to have housing and to build housing. It’s connections with people in the state that make it possible to do those things. So deep down, Donald Trump knows that it’s very important to have the state support for the money he wants to make.

Is there anything else we haven’t covered that you want to tell our readers?

I was very excited to hear about the potential of expropriation in Berlin, and I think more and more that we have to be talking about expropriation in America, and especially in New York City. Sometimes I am surprised that even conservative people will agree that if a landlord is not doing a good job, the building shouldn’t be in their possession anymore. 

In New York City and nationwide, we must be discussing different forms of ownership, like community land trusts. This means that the property is owned in common, and there is a limit on how much any individual can profit from leaving their apartment if they want somebody else to have it. 

This expands a little bit the idea of how private property can be organized. It is so painful to me in the United States that the hope that private property will gain more value is the stopgap against our lack of a social welfare system. If you don’t have private property, you can’t pay for your children’s college, or your retirement, or health care that isn’t covered by your insurance.

These are things which wouldn’t be as great a concern in a different society. I am hoping that someday we may realize the dream of having such a society in the United States and in New York especially, because I’m devoted to New York.

Intentional Provocation

Report from the parliamentary observer of the rally “Beats against genocide”


30/08/2024

The event “Beats against genocide” was organised to raise awareness among young people and the hip-hop scene about the situation in Gaza and Palestine, and of German participation in war crimes. It ended up on the almost endless list of attacks in Berlin against the freedom to assemble around the subject of Palestine.

The planned rally was a thorn in the side of the so-called security authorities from the moment that it was first registered. This can be seen in the dispute around the venue. The organisers had planned Hermannplatz, which has great meaning for the Palestinian community and people who stand in solidarity with them. Regular demonstrations against war and occupation have taken place there, and repression has often been strongest there.

In the first talks about the concert the police questioned the venue, using the shabby justification that there was not enough space. While the organisers reckoned with 300 participants, the police allegedly expected 1,000 and signaled that the public authorities would not allow Hermannplatz. Furthermore, the police argued that traffic would be obstructed, which, according to the organisers, should never be used to justify limiting the right to assembly. Protest is by its nature a disruption of the normal state of things.

As an act of goodwill, the organisers then suggested Reuterplatz. Finally the authorities allocated Südstern. The available space there is significantly smaller than at Hermannplatz. Accessibility is enormously limited by the U-Bahn station and by the several busy roads which meet there. But the police no longer showed any interest in the stated reasons of limited space and traffic safety.

Permission to assembly came with many pages of justification showing that Hermannplatz had been not allowed for political reasons because of its physical proximity to Sonnenallee. As the organisers naturally wanted their event to happen, this change of venue at very short notice was accepted and advertised.

At the event itself, it became quickly clear that the police were making changes which were not part of the previous discussions or the permission to assembly. Among these changes were the unannounced video surveillance from the beginning of the event.

As with every assembly related to Palestine, at the beginning of the event there had to be an announcement of restrictions, including the ban of burning flags and puppets. These acts are already banned, but it was implied that the attendees would be expected to do this anyway.

Only a few minutes after the beginning of the event, as the first music act appeared, the police escalated the situation. After a phrase was used from the stage which the police considered to be “criminally relevant”, several police stormed the area around the stage immediately and without any warning. They brutally arrested the suspect and injured several bystanders. The usual milder methods of protecting the right to assembly of all participants was thus ignored.

Following the violent intervention by the police, the sound system, mixer, and the microphone were no longer useable. This also resulted in the event organisers being no longer able to adequately address the provoked and enraged participants.

In the escalated situation after the police intervention, three or four people chanted “Takbir” and “Hamas, Hamas”. I also described this as problematic to the press, adding that at the same time this was drowned out by the clear majority of the gathering chanting “Free, Free Palestine”.

In order to calm down the situation, the main organiser, in consultation with other organisers, attempted to convince the police not to break up the meeting before the arrival of a replacement music system. The police were only prepared to use their own loudspeaker van to set the conditions for the continuation of the event after waiting twenty minutes.

In the intervening period, people were time and again brutally removed from the event and arrested, inclusing a woman wearing a hijab. As a reaction to the aggressive behaviour of the police, plastic bottles were thrown from the protest. I did not see any of the glass bottles which were reported by the police.

Under these aggravated conditions, the organisers found a megaphone and speaker as quickly as they could and carried out the event in a very slimmed-down form until its end around 9pm.

The trouble didn’t end here. Just before the end of the event, the police announced that participants were not allowed to leave the meeting in the direction of Hermannplatz. It was therefore only practically possible to leave Südstern and go towards Mehringdamm and Urbanstraße. At the same time there was the demand that people do not leave in large groups. The police made a peaceful dissolution more difficult, as people were not able to go home without a great detour.

The heated atmosphere between demonstrators and police has been built up over recent months through brutal police actions and demonstration bans. The right to assembly must apply to all and must not be sabotaged by the behaviour of the police.

This statement first appeared in German on Ferat Koçak’s website. Translation: Phil Butland. Reproduced with permisson.