The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Anti-German and other Germans

A set of two poems


23/03/2024

Anti-German

 

O Israel, long live thou!

We’re the offspring of Nazis,

and there is no One greater

than the IDF

 

We’re proudly aghast

at our ancestors‘ crime!

Which, as long as we live,

must never happen again!

 

O Hatred of Jews

In Eternity

Shall our bond be renewed

When we fight against thee

 

Our guilt is our pride

Our capital, too

Siemens, Diehl, Rheinmetall

Thyssenkrupp, AEG, Heidelberg Zement

 


Other Germans

 

Listen, I also don’t support
what Israel is doing in Gaza.
Look at all the dead children!

You’re right, Germany is sending weapons!
It’s a shame!
And now people are even starving!

What are you saying? Protest?

Yeah, I heard about those! In Sonnenallee, right? Those Arabs, Muslims…
They first gotta learn that in Germany they can‘t… Antisemitism…
Islamists, Israel-haters, Hamas-supporters, terrorists, Breitscheidplatz-why-do-they-hate-us … Violence-prone young men… Criminal clans… Failed integration… Shisha bars…

You know, I’m not that bothered by what’s happening in Gaza.

“It’s So Berlin!” 10: Common Ground

The tenth and final instalment in our series of photographs and cartoons about Berlin.

Photo: Rasha Al-Jundi

 

While people do come together in those spots, they still live in their own little individual worlds. Common grounds do not always guarantee togetherness, yet the individuality and uniqueness of the characters that make up Berlin is part of what makes this place a special one.

 

Cartoon: Michael Jabareen

Despite all of its problems, just like any other urban jungle, Berlin includes several common grounds that bring people of all walks of life and socio-economic statuses together. As immigrants living in the city, we notice these spaces mostly where food and/or drinks are present.

Therefore, we decided to bring several characters from all preceding frames in this series, together in this image, that is titled “Common Ground”. The abandoned items here are two furniture items (a white shelf wrack, a sofa seat),  a pair of green pants and black house slippers.

The items act as dividers between two spots that typically act as common grounds for Berliners, namely: the “Späti”, a small or medium sized grocery outlet that is typical of Berlin and its name is only known in the German capital. The other spot is the “Döner” shop, that serves the Turkish-German chicken and/or meat wrap. Invented by Turkish immigrants to Germany and inspired by the original Turkish kebab, this street food is popular with the majority of those living in and/or visiting Berlin specifically and Germany as a whole. Both spots can get really crowded with queues of people lined up to either grab their snack, drink or both and are usually open into the late night hours and on Sundays. They can be life savers to the hungry and thirsty rave goers, late nighters or Sunday snoozers.

While people do come together in those spots, they still live in their own little individual worlds. Common grounds do not always guarantee togetherness, yet the individuality and uniqueness of the characters that make up Berlin is part of what makes this place a special one.

Image taken in Neukölln, Berlin (2022).

This is the final part of Rasha and Michael’s series of photos and cartoons about contemporary Berlin. You can see the previous parts of the series here:

These are Truly Dangerous People – Interview with Ilya Kharkow

For those who feel ashamed of their own unwillingness to fight, I want to remind that shame is a form of self-hatred.


22/03/2024

Tell our readers about yourself

My name is Ilya Kharkow. I’m the author of the novel THE MINING BOYS. A year and a half ago I fled Ukraine. I am here to remind each of you that your life is more than a political compromise.

What do you mean by this?

Today in Ukraine, being a guy means being a mobilization reserve, not a human.

Recently, I learned that only 3 countries in Europe don’t compel men to participate in war in the event of martial law: Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland.

I hope this is a mistake. But if it’s true, then we have problems. And I want to talk about it.

So, you think there is no need to defend a country?

If that’s your sincere desire, then do it. But I believe that you can’t become a hero by force. No one has the right to demand that you risk your life for anything. Why? Because your life is the highest value. If you do not realize the value of your own life, then you should not expect the state to do it for you in the midst of war.

What if the highest value for someone is not their life, but, for example, their family?

Protecting a family doesn’t mean going to war. Protecting a family means staying with a family during difficult times.

I grew up without a dad, and it made my childhood uneasy. That’s why I don’t understand how married guys with kids can leave them.

I was 3 years old when my dad left the family. It’s because of that I remember my early childhood well. That period that healthy children usually forget. If you dare to make love in front of an infant, hoping that he doesn’t understand what is going on, remember my story because I remember well how my parents did it. But you know, without these memories, my books might not contain so many intimate descriptions.

But guys don’t always leave their families voluntarily. As far as we understand, only a small percentage of men are not subject to mobilization.

This is one of the reasons why I say that forced mobilization is a crime. The state demands that you choose protecting its borders over raising your own kids. And then your kids end up in single-parent families, where they grow up to be artists unadopted to life, yeah, I know what I’m talking about.

A guy is not taken to war only if he has 3 or more kids. But on the Internet, you can easily find videos of blind people receiving summonses. I once saw a video where the military forcibly took a guy with amputated wrists to the military registration and enlistment office to check his suitability for military service. This inspired me to write the story “WOULD YOU TOUCH IT?”

Tell us more about your position on the war.

So, try to step back from the image of war that news imposes on us, and you’ll see a fight of 2 systems. There is no good here. No bright side. There are just 2 systems, and each invites you to take someone’s side. But often, when you’re forced to choose between 2 options, it’s worth choosing a third.

Quality of life. Citizens’ happiness index. What exactly are we defending? Is it someone else’s right to send us to the front lines and destroy our homes in a sake of saving the whole world?

By conducting mobilization, the Ukrainian side has done exactly what it frightened us with when describing mobilization in Russia. I remember with what glee Ukrainian TV presenters talked about Russian mobilization points opening on the border with Georgia. Meanwhile, Russian borders are open, and Ukraine’s borders have been closed to guys for two years now, and for these two years, there has been a real hunt for guys in the country.

The goal of Ukrainian checkpoints is no longer to repel enemy advances, but to catch guys on the roads and send them to their deaths. And yet, we were told that there is only one enemy, and we believed it.

In defending democratic values, it would be worth asking how things are with them in Ukraine. Corruption? Exists. Homophobia? Exists. Discrimination based on language? Now this is a big issue too. Can a corrupt person lead the fight against corruption? So why do we believe that a country that is destroying democratic values before our eyes can defend these same values?

Could you tell us more about discrimination based on language?

In Ukraine, there is aggressive Ukrainization happening, which is causing concerns. This is not a matter of culture; it is a reason for hatred among the population.

I’ll just tell you a story. Here’s what recently happened to me while walking in a residential area of Lisbon. I stumbled upon a library. On the window hung a yellow-blue sign: “BOOKS FOR UKRAINIANS.” Books for me are like insulin for diabetics. So naturally, I go inside. A middle-aged woman proudly points to a small shelf with books, but they were all in Ukrainian. I ask if they have books in Russian here? I was told there were two, but they “disposed of” them. Why? Because they support Ukrainians.

I’m not surprised that a random woman from Portugal doesn’t know that for historical reasons, for half of Ukraine’s residents, the native language is Russian, not Ukrainian. But now this is forgotten even inside the country.

Maybe this shows changes in society if, as you say, in Ukraine they have forgotten that half of the country’s inhabitants consider Russian their native language?

Yep, it really shows the changes in society. Indeed, a certain percentage of Ukrainians have transitioned to the Ukrainian language. I also tried to communicate in Ukrainian at the beginning of the war. But like many of my friends, I have switched back to Russian.

Having lived for two and a half months in western Ukraine at the beginning of the war, I vividly saw the intense hatred locals harbor towards everything Russian, even towards me as a speaker of that language, as if I were the cause of the war. The song to which I lost my virginity is considered an enemy song by people from western Ukraine, but for me, it’s a cherished memory.

I understand why one might harbor negative feelings towards a political force, but I don’t understand why one would hate a culture. Have Kropotkin’s ideas become worse because the Russian army entered Ukraine back in 2022?

How do you feel about Russian culture today?

I’m a philologist and a writer, and therefore I cannot imagine my life without literature. I consist of French, German, and Russian literature. It’s important to understand that all of these are not separate parts of an abstract literature, but rather a continuous dialogue of dozens of writers that has been going on for centuries.

I cannot imagine that because of the actions of modern politicians, I would change my attitude towards any of these figures. But they have long been dead and, to some extent, defenseless. I believe that we must stand in defense of culture, regardless of the nationality of its creators, because high culture knows no borders.

Yet, in Ukraine, Russian culture is being cancelled. This is a normal primary reaction in wartime. But only primary! Now it’s been two years. For example, in Russia during World War I, German culture was cancelled. Now, however, the German language is again one of the most popular foreign languages ​​to study.

It is important to understand that only someone who truly doesn’t know the value of culture can give it up. Once, Americans traded Manhattan Island with the Indians for beads worth $24. By canceling part of culture, we are not only voluntarily giving up Manhattan, we are even giving up the beads.

If you could return to Ukraine without consequence, would you?

Recently, I formulated the definition of home to me this way – my home is where my books are.

I desperately tried to escape from Ukraine for almost 9 months. The day it happened, I consider my second birthday. The question is not whether I would return to Ukraine. The question is, would all those who are currently trapped in that country against their will want to leave and live in a world without borders between countries, without language barriers, and without military conscription? This is how I envision the world of the future.

Would you fight for such a world?

You can’t fight for peace. War is destruction, and deep inside, everyone knows that. I’m sure that war cannot be stopped with weapons, just as you can’t calm a storm by throwing stones into the waves.

Peacekeeping forces are still military forces. I am against any violence because I see that violence only creates more pain. If you don’t share my viewpoint, then fight, but don’t drag peaceful people into it. Everyone should have the right to refuse military service.

Can you tell us about your hometown?

My hometown has been under occupation since the first days of the war. Nearby is a nuclear power plant, so there is a huge number of Russian militaries in the town.

From time to time, the Ukrainian army fires at Russian troops in my town, and then the homes of my relatives suffer. It’s a small town. In the scale of this war, it can be destroyed in a couple of hours, and it will take years to rebuild it. Nearby villages have already been destroyed. What should I feel when the Ukrainian army fires at my town? Should I be a patriot of my country or my family?

What do you think about the concept of patriotism?

A musician Andrey Lysikov, better known as Dolphin, summed it up perfectly: “A state that orders to kill children will always call itself the homeland.”

What is your view on Ukrainian nationalism pre-war, was it very prevalent?

In Ukraine, like in any other country in the world, there were and are radicals. They are everywhere, but in different percentages. I cannot say that in Ukraine the radical layer was frighteningly large. But of course it exsists.

Nevertheless, the truly dangerous ones, in my opinion, are those who are talked about least. People whose loved ones died in the war, who now wish for others to share their sorrow. They wish for other kids to go to war. They actively contribute to this. These are the truly dangerous people.

They act quietly. All these dear old men and intelligent aunties. Those faceless coat wearers who give way to you at traffic lights and wish you a good day at a supermarket. Kids are suddenly left without brothers and dads. They have no other idea aside from revenge. They have no ideals. They don’t want to build a new, fair country, they just want revenge.

In Lviv at the beginning of the war, dear old people did not allow my friend into a rented apartment, demanding that he first go to the military registration office and showed a confirmation that he was there. I described that Lviv period in THE MINING BOYS.

Do you have any ideas what can be done about this?

Here, it’s not weapons and violence that can come to our aid, but culture. This is why cancel culture is dangerous. It is dangerous to allow culture to be canceled in wartime.

Nietzsche wrote that culture is only a thin apple peel over seething chaos. What would remain for humanity if we remove this apple peel? Unfortunately, war shows us how little may remain. But we can and must resist this chaos by standing up for culture, elevating it above national characteristics.

How does the Ukrainian government treat guys abroad?

Oh, this is an interesting question. For example, Ukraine has banned us from using consular services. It’s not a direct ban, but without a document exempting you from military service, the consul won’t see you.

Ukrainian officials have reached out to the leaders of European countries, asking them to close integration programs for Ukrainians.

Every couple of months, there are reports that Ukrainian men are about to be deported at Ukraine’s request. So, if Ukraine isn’t my enemy, then why am I forced to defend myself against it?

There are many major and minor crimes happening daily. But if every person had the right not to participate in war, an absolute right, then there would simply be no basis for these crimes. War should either be voluntary or waged against those who compel you to it.

Any final words you would like to say?

While most of us are preoccupied with the idea of defeating the big enemy, we have stopped noticing how this fight is destroying the lives of ordinary people. Right now, both in Russia and Ukraine, a huge number of guys are suffering from mobilization. If we don’t give a damn about the lives of a few, then what is our society and our peace worth?

For more information about Ilya Kharkow, see his website. You can support his work by buying him a coffee.

Berlin’s mayor loves antisemites

Kai Wegner denounces the “antisemitism” of left-wing Jews — while he embraces the most high-profile antisemitic conspiracy theorist in the world.


20/03/2024

On Saturday, the Austrian Nazi Martin Sellner was detained by Swiss police and expelled from the country. Sellner is known internationally for his calls to deport millions of non-white people from Germany (which he calls “remigration”). When reports were published about a meeting he had with leading members of the far-right AfD last November, millions of people took to the streets of Germany to protest against racism. Sellner also had connections to the fascist mass murderer in Christchurch.

When he posted a video on Twitter about being expelled from Switzerland (his own “remigration”), he got a reply from the platform’s owner. Elon Musk asked: “Is this legal?”

Sellner, leader of the fascist Identitarian Movement, had been banned from Twitter in 2020. He was welcomed back to the platform just last week, and he thanked Musk personally.

Musk has been increasingly open about his fascist and antisemitic views. He has endorsed the conspiracy theory that Jews control migration and promote “hatred against whites” — this is, in Musk’s words, “the actual truth.” He has attacked the Jewish billionaire George Soros (who “hates humanity,” according to Musk) and supported the AfD. He has used his billions to make Twitter a safe space for Nazis.

Yet none of this stopped Berlin mayor Kai Wegner (CDU) from embracing Musk last week, as did Brandenburg’s prime minister, Dietmar Woidke (SPD). Responding to criticism about posing with such a well-known antisemite, Wegner only said that “Tesla is an important employer for the whole region.” He explicitly refused to condemn Musk’s far-right and antisemitic views. 

When Israeli and Palestinian filmmakers at the Berlinale film festival called for equality, Wegner said such views should be banned. “There is no space for antisemitism in Berlin,” he declared.

What Wegner meant to say: There is space for antisemitism as long as you’re a billionaire. Musk is not the only antisemite Wegner’s admires.

  • The biggest donors to the CDU are the Quandt siblings, who inherited billions from Nazi war criminals.
  • Horst Seehofer, the former German interior minister and a CDU/CSU leader, supported a historical association that relativized the crimes of the Nazi army and denied the facts of the Holocaust.
  • The hotel where Sellner met with AfD leaders to discuss mass deportations was provided by Wilhelm Wilderink, a CDU member.
  • Peter Kurth, a former Berlin economics senator and another CDU member, has been revealed to be one of the main sponsors of Sellner’s Identitarians.
  • Hans-Georg Maaßen, the former head of the internal secret service and yet another CDU member, has been spouting antisemitic conspiracy theories. 
  • An early leader of the CDU, Hans Globke, was the author of the Nazis’ Nuremberg Race Laws against Jews. 

A few of these people, such as Kurth and Maaßen, recently resigned from the CDU voluntarily. Others, like Seehofer, have faced no consequences for their far-right views. The CDU is still trying to protect the memory of the fascist mass murderer Globke.

In other words, Wegner is absolutely surrounded by antisemites. He was himself in far-right Facebook groups. He only talks about “antisemitism” to voice support for Israel’s right-wing government and its genocidal assault against Gaza. All genuine antisemites get a “Persilschein,” a bill of clean health, from Wegner.

As I’ve written before, it’s not that the German state is overzealous in its fight against antisemitism, and is thus accidentally including left-wing Jews. All these “Antisemitism Bureaucrats” are about protecting actual antisemites, who tend to be right-wing Germans. The accusations of antisemitism against leftists, immigrants, and Jews are a smokescreen to distract from the state’s deep hostility to Jews.

Charlotte Church – Voice of an Activist

The Welsh singer’s strong words for Palestine are part of a radicalisation which she has been showing for years


18/03/2024

Charlotte Church learned not to trust the media at a very young age. She was originally feted for singing ”Pie Jesu” from Andrew Lloyd Webber’s requiem in 1997, at the age of 11. The next year, she released ”Voice of an Angel”, becoming the youngest artist in the British classical albums chart. Reviews of the album called Church “talented, young, and adorable”. Her fans apparently included Prince Charles and Pope John Paul II.

At first, Church was an ”unpolitical” member of the Arts establishment. She performed for Bill Clinton and George Bush and sang at Rupert Murdoch’s Wedding to Wendy Deng. She claims that Murdoch offered her £100,000 to sing, but she waived the fee in return for good publicity – a deal which Murdoch later reneged on.

As she got older, coverage of Church became more ominous. An article in the Guardian refers obliquely to “fascination with her private life – from the online countdown to her 16th birthday, to tabloid coverage of her teenage smoking and drinking, not to mention the swearing, the weight gain, and the unsuitable boyfriends who kissed and told.”

What was meant by “countdown to her 16th birthday”? When Church was still 15, an Internet site was set up headed “Charlotte Church Countdown”, giving the number of days until “Charlotte Church is legal”. Although it was wrongly assumed that this site was set up by the Sun, the occurence was still gleefully reported by the tabloid press. Church later responded: “it was bizarre, all these grown men looking on a website: ‘How many hours to go?’ Disgusting!”

That was not all. On Radio 1, DJ Chris Moyles, then 28, said on air that he wanted to “lead her through the forest of sexuality now she had reached 16”. A few months later, she was awarded the Rear of the Year award. She later admitted that accepting the award was “a ridiculous choice, a stupid thing to do but, you know, there was a whole host of people that I was working with who should have said, ‘Woah. woah. woah. You shouldn’t do this. This is bad, you’re 16.’”

As Church grew older, the press became obsessed with her drinking habits, her swearing, and her celebrity engagement to rugby player Gavin Henson. She became “the girl portrayed as a chav, a binge drinker, a fallen angel, a symbol of everything wrong with modern Britain”. Her initial response was to request privacy and hide away from media attention.

At the time, Church played along with the media; in later interviews she was more reflective, saying: “here was a way in which young women were presented, and particularly young working-class women. And because I didn’t have any life experience, and because I hadn’t stepped into my female power in any way, shape or form, I allowed that narrative to be told. I even played along with it, because it’s what people wanted.”

Charlotte becomes an activist

When the Leveson inquiry exposed intrusive behaviour from the British press, especially Murdoch’s News of the World, Church was revealed to be one of the victims of phone hacking. After listening in on her calls, the tabloids published stories about her mother’s attempted suicide and her father’s affair.

At the enquiry, “she described how photographers had installed secret cameras outside her home to track her movements, followed her car, and tried to take upskirt shots. Her first pregnancy was revealed in the Sun before she had even told her parents; her mother’s mental health crisis and suicide attempt were exposed by the News of the World.”

After Leveson, Church became political, saying “I started to understand how corrupt shit was. I suppose the more you see this kind of stuff, the less you can undo seeing it. Eighty per cent of the papers are owned by five billionaires and it’s happening all over the world. That concentration of power and money in too few hands has never been very good historically … After seeing that, I started getting more and more annoyed at the Tory government and when they got in again I was totally devastated.”

In a later interview she explains her turn to activism post-Leveson: “I hadn’t been interested in politics before because I thought it was all bullshit and they were all full of bullshit. And then when I started to understand how corrupt things were in the press, in government … There was so much injustice that I was like, ‘No, I’m going to get involved and try and understand.’” She voted for the first time in 2015.

After the Tories won that election, Church started attending demonstrations. In 2015, Wales Online reported that she was “last seen wielding a placard which read ‘I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore’ as she marched through the streets of of her home city of Cardiff on the weekend to protest austerity measures following the Conservatives’ recent win at the General election.”

Following that demonstration, she started to get active. As she recounted: “I got involved with the People’s Assembly and I met amazing people, just out on the streets, telling me stories about what had happened when their benefits were cut or they got chucked out of their house. And then you’re in, you know what I mean? You’re absolutely in.”

In the same year, Church appeared on stage at Glastonbury with Pussy Riot, and joined a Greenpeace protest against drilling in the Arctic, singing outside Shell’s London offices. When detractors (not for the last time), accused her of being a “silly girl”, she replied: “What I think perplexes me the most when people get wrathful at celebrities campaigning is that they don’t react that way when a celebrity is being paid to endorse a product.”

She went on: “the only relevant fact here is that not just Shell, but Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Norway’s Statoil and, I don’t know, let’s just call them all Psychopaths Anonymous, have so little respect for scientific research that they are going to bore into the Earth’s achilles heel to steal and burn the very stuff that will weaken this extraordinary wilderness further … And we can stop it, before it’s too late.”

When Jeremy Corbyn became Labour leader, Church was a great supporter. In 2016, the Guardian reported that she was “spotted urging the audience at a Jeremy Corbyn rally to “get these fucking Tories out.” In the same year, she played a fundraiser for Corbyn’s campaign to become prime minister on a radical reformist platform.

She spoke up for Corbyn on Radio 4’s Today programme, saying: “You look at the way that Jeremy Corbyn has just been completely slated, so unfairly, a lot of the time, then I think there is definitely an unbalance there. The majority of stuff I see about Jeremy Corbyn I don’t think reflects the popular idea of who he is and what the people think. It comes across as a little biased.”

Speaking Up for Palestine

All this is just a prelude to Church’s latest “scandal”. On March 9th this year. she attended a demonstration for Palestine, singling “There are no leaders who dare to say ‘Every life is precious’, so it will have to be us.” She concluded her speech with a quote by Carl Jung: “The spirit of evil is a negation of the life force by fear. Only boldness can deliver us from fear. And if the risk isn’t taken, the meaning of life is violated. This is how much this means. Free, free Palestine!”

Church also had the temerity to take part in a Sing for Palestine event organised by the Middle East Childrens’ Alliance to raise money for a new ambulance for the Al Awda hospital. At the event, she led a 100 strong choir singing “From the River to the Sea”.

The usual Greek chorus of self-appointed experts had a predictable reaction. The right-wing Campaign Against Antisemitism accused Church of “using the voice for which she is so well known to fan the flames of hatred.” The Daily Mail reported Andrew Percy MP calling her to “hang her head in shame”. Police were called to check on Church’s family after they were threatened by “some pretty scary people”.

On the BBC, reporter Nick Robinson asked notorious racist Nigel Farage whether Church should be arrested for singing “From the river to the sea…” Farage’s response was to call her a “naive idiot”, who should be “given a severe warning”, and “made to see the error of her ways”. All this on Britain’s public broadcaster presented as unbiased news.

Church wrote a powerful reply on her blog, entitled From a mother on Mother’s Day. In it, she said: “I have to take the opportunity to speak out because since the start of the genocide very little of the campaign that calls for an end to Israeli aggression in Palestine has been covered by the press, except when it is being denounced as ‘hateful’ or ‘islamist’ by some of the most notorious racists in the western world.”

After addressing the legitimacy of the chant “From the river to the sea” and the apartheid system in modern Israel, Church eloquently denounced Robinson, Farage and “self-proclaimed ‘public intellectual’” David Baddiel for their “’shush, silly girl’ strategy”, used to silence any opposition. In passing, she pointed out Baddiel’s “checkered hisory with racism”, which hardly gives him a safe place on the moral high ground.

She concluded by calling on “all mothers, all grandmothers, in fact all those who have mothers, to hold in our hearts all those who had mothers in Gaza and now do not, all those mothers whose children have been murdered, and the families whose every member has been brutalised and wiped out. Let us listen to our bones, our great-great-grandmothers’ instincts that live within us, and reject the fallacy of western patriarchal moral authority.”

Why is any of this important?

A main part of Church’s story is about class and gender. Although she earned a lot of money very young, she remains shaped by the working class values she gained growing up in the Welsh city of Cardiff. She has also learned how to healthily respond to a lifetime of patronising men talking down to her (she doesn’t need me to explain how well she has reacted).

When asked why more public figures aren’t speaking out on Palestine, she answered: “clearly there is risk in it, the risk of being labelled an antisemite. People think they have too much to lose.” She went on: “I can do nothing but be a part of this movement … this is not just for the people of Palestine who are currently experiencing the worst thing I’ve ever lived through on planet Earth … But it is striking at the very heart of all of our freedoms and our ability to call for something better.”

And yet, at a time when so few artists and MPs are putting their heads above the parapet to speak out about Palestine, Church’s steadfast intervention is exemplary. Her erudition busts the myths that working class people should ”just shut up and listen” to our betters. She speaks for all of us.