The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

News from Berlin and Germany: 19th June 2021

Weekly news roundup from Berlin and Germany


18/06/2021

Compiled by Ana Ferreira

 

NEWS FROM BERLIN

Court case about racism in Aldi and use of the N* word

An Aldi branch manager was dismissed for pushing a German-Ghanaian man out the door in April. Prince Ofori (member of an artist collective) felt insulted by a customer who allegedly held a packet of “chocolate kisses” in his hands. The customer then allegedly turned towards the dark-skinned Prince Ofori and said, “Today, let’s treat ourselves to a pack of n… kisses!” And Prince Ofori filmed that. After he uploaded the video to Youtube, it was clicked four million times within hours! In the video, he was not wearing the mandatory FFP-2 mask at the moment of the recording. Source: bz

Berlin police clash with squatters and their supporters

Police and firefighters in Berlin were caught in a street battle last Wednesday. The explanation for this has with the apartment complex located at Rigaer Strasse 94 to do. On Tuesday, the Berlin Administrative Court rejected a last-minute attempt to block a Thursday fire safety inspection of the building complex. The authorities then claimed that the situation inside the buildings posed an urgent danger to public safety and order. The complex comprises three houses. Ahead of the inspection, police arrived Wednesday morning with tactical vehicles and a water cannon. Police declared the zone restricted for vehicle parking until Friday evening and banned demonstrations in the area. Source: dw

NEWS FROM GERMANY

No exit for peace activists

Politicians and activists from Germany wanted to travel from Düsseldorf to the Kurdish autonomous regions in Iraq on Saturday. One of their goals: to mediate between the Kurdish autonomous government in Erbil and the PKK. But the peace delegation’s journey ended in a windowless corridor at Düsseldorf airport. Upon arrival at the airport, Cansu Özdemir, leader of the Left Party (“die Linke”) in Hamburg, noticed a “very conspicuous” man. He walked around the meeting delegation, photographed them and followed them. Özdemir suspects the man works for the Office for the Protection of the Constitution. Source: nd

AfD representatives possibly threatened with expulsion

Three leading AfD representatives in Lower Saxony are facing expulsion from the party following reports of a revival of the “wing”, which is classified as right-wing extremist by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution. According to information from participant circles, the party executive of the AfD has spoken out in favour of applying for the expulsion of the three from the party. AfD leader Jörg Meuthen said on last Friday before a meeting of the party leadership in Berlin: “As far as there is an attempt to build parallel structures, that is definitely unacceptable and damaging to the party.” Source: süddeutsche

Wimp hats must pay

The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution must pay Christiane Meusel 10,000 euros in damages. The lawyer won a bullying lawsuit against her ex-employer. Among other things, she worked in the reporting and public relations unit from 2013 to 2019. Her tasks at times included monitoring Islamist propaganda on social networks. But soon most of her tasks were taken away and she was advised by the therapist to change jobs for health reasons. Meusel’s claim for compensation for pain and suffering was rejected at first instance. She currently works in Berlin as a lawyer specialising in labour law and mobbing cases. Source: nd

On Queer Palestine and the Intersectional Critique

Discussing Queer Palestine in the Global North: two books reviewed


17/06/2021

I have been wanting for a while now to dedicate one of my instagram-book-posts to Sarah Schulman’s Israel/ Palestine and the Queer International and one to Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique by Dr. Sa’ed Atshan. With selected passages from each book, as I usually do, because there is so much in both books that I know a lot of people can learn from. But with everything that is happening at the moment, I wanted to prioritise making people, especially those in Europe and North America, aware of these books as soon as possible and to not only limit this to an instagram post. I am sure there are many books that you can read / listen to, to inform yourself, but I wanted to highlight these two books that I’ve learned a lot from and have spoken to me the most.

Sarah Schulman is a Jewish queer activist, educator, novelist, with novels and non-fiction work that span over three decades. She has been an active member of ACT UP since 1987 and has co-founded the ACT UP Oral History Project. In Israel / Palestine and the Queer International, she describes her dawning consciousness of the Palestinian liberation struggle and expands on what she has learned along the way and the importance of queer solidarity with the Palestinian people.

Dr. Sa’ed Atshan is a Palestinian academic who is Associate Professor of Peace and Conflict Studies at Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania, USA. In Queer Palestine and the Empire of Crtique he focuses on the rise of the Palestinian LGBTQ movement, the impact it had and still has both locally and internationally, as well as the global queer solidarity movement with the Palestinian liberation struggle.

With the global uprising of June 2020, it seemed as if a lot white folks, white institutions and so on, might finally make a massive shift towards truly valuing Black lives and putting forward material change. But seeing how things are going back to the way they were in the ‘underground’ dance music scene’ which I’m a part of, made me realize that most white folks are still not willing to push for material change. And when it comes to the lives of Palestinian people, most white people who consider themselves progressive, refuse to even do the bare minimum of speaking out in solidarity with the Palestinian people. With many of them using ‘not being well informed’ as an excuse. First of all, you don’t need to be ‘well informed’ to be against the oppression and killing of the Palestinian people by the Israeli state. Secondly, I do understand the insecurities in discussions around supporting the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, especially in Europe and North America, because most of our governments, if not all, are unapologetically pro Israel. Of course, the stance of our government heavily influences public discourse and vice versa and although things are changing, publicly expressing solidarity with the Palestinian people can still have a lot of negative consequences for some people, especially folks on the margins. But this is not the case for most people, especially those in a privileged position, and even if it does have consequences to stand for what’s right, isn’t it worth it?

When you stay silent, because you are not ‘well informed’ and you don’t put effort into educating yourself, then you have chosen the side of the oppressor. Lest we forget, white silence is violence. In Israel / Palestine and the Queer International Sarah Schulman discusses her own journey towards understanding and supporting the BDS movement and she is very honest about her own process.

“One of the strangest things about wilful ignorance regarding Israel and Palestine is how often “progressive” people, like myself, with histories of community activism and awareness, engage in it. In this way it somewhat parallels the history of homophobia, in that there are emotional blocks that keep many straight people from applying their general value systems to human rights for all. The irony, in my case, of being a lifelong activist and not doing the work to “get it” about Israel is deep and hard to both understand and convey. But I have come to learn that this insistent blindness is pervasive, and I want to use the opportunity of this book to confront and expose my own denial in a way that I hope will be helpful to others.”

There are those of us for whom support for Palestine was a given, because of the environment we grew up in or the friends we had early on. To them I’d like to say, and I want to emphasise that I am specifically speaking to folks in Europe and North America, some of us also need to educate ourselves to make sure that our solidarity is more in depth and not just on a reactionary level, which can sometimes reproduce anti-Semitic tropes. A mistake that is still made very often in Europe and North America that causes a lot of harm is, holding Jewish people all over the world accountable for the actions of the fascist Israeli state. Stop demanding from US-American Jews, Dutch Jews and so on, to speak on Israel. The right-wing, especially fundamental Christians and the Israeli government, push the narrative of equating Jewish people across the world with the state of Israel, even though there are Jewish led organisations in almost every country, including Israel, that stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people in their struggle for liberation. So, as progressives we need to reject the equating of Jewish people with the Israeli state.

Dr. Sa’ed Atshan points out in ‘Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique’

“Although there can be overlap between anti-Semitism and opposition to Zionism, distinguishing between them is essential, and acknowledging that distinction is necessary in order to recognize when anti-Semitism has actually become manifest. From the Palestinian vantage point, what matters is not how Zionism is romanticized but how it is practiced.“

Big part of both books is the BDS movement and Brand Israel.

Dr. Sa’ed Atshan:

“In 2005 the Israeli government launched its Brand Israel campaign, and Palestinian civil society launched its Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. The BDS movement demands boycotts against institutions complicit in Israel’s system of oppression and has motivated queer Palestinian activists to cultivate transnational solidarity networks. Its genesis marked a turning point for queer Palestinian activists, connecting their activism not only to Palestinian and Israeli audiences but also to people around the world.”

Sarah Schulman:

“What makes BDS difficult is that it requires a critical mass of people to take the time to understand why it is necessary and how it works. And it is dependent on people outside of Palestine and Israel to carry it out. We have to be the ones to impose sanctions, or else there are no sanctions. It is a strategy devised by the oppressed, but dependent on allies. And as far as I can see, it is the strategy with the most potential for success.”

It is very important that we listen to the will of the Palestinian people and if you are on board with the BDS movement you respect and advocate for what the movement’s demands are. Remember, it is not about you, it is about the will of the Palestinian people. The 3 demands of the BDS movement are; 1. Ending Israeli occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the Wall, 2. Recognising the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality, 3. Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN Resolution 194

Dr. Sa’ed Atshan:

“Boycotts have become the major tool and mode for engaging with Palestine solidarity globally, including in many LGBTQ communities. The formal endorsement of BDS by the queer Palestinian movement has provided LGBTQ Palestinians with a seat at the Palestinian civil society table, thereby challenging Palestinian homophobia and altering perceptions of queer Palestinians within Palestinian society.”

There is the narrative that being critical of Israel is inherently anti-Semitic, which in Germany, combined with their collective public guilt for sins of the past, is deep embedded. So much so that BDS movement is compared to the Nazi boycott of Jewish people. And this narrative is so widely spread that even nightclubs organise a solidarity march for Israeli and release statements defining Palestinians is terrorists and Israelis is the sole victims. When Susan Slymovics, an established anthropologist and the daughter of a survivor of Shoah, was scheduled to speak at the Free University in Berlin in 2018, there were calls to cancel her appearance. And because of her support for the BDS movement, she was even labeled as Anti-Semitic.

Sarah Schulman:

Portraying BDS as “pro-Palestine and anti-Israel” makes it sound like a football game, with false assumptions of equality of positions and equal playing fields. What will be justice for the Jews will also be justice for the Palestinians.

It is important to understand that speaking up is not enough and we need to be fully on board with the BDS movement. This is especially important for those of us in Europe and North America, because most of our governments directly support the oppression and killing of Palestinian citizens, either financially and / or with arms deals. So if our country is standing with the state of Israel, it is our responsibility to write, call, e-mail, the elected officials we voted for.

In countries like the Netherlands where there is a multiparty-system, some parties are less clear about their support for the state of Israel, but Bij1 is a party that unapologetically stands with the Palestinian people. So it is your responsibility to address this with the party you voted for and specifically the candidate who received your vote. I am specifically addressing white people more than BPoC here, because white voices still carry more weight with those (white people) in power, and solidarity demands engagement and support across differences.

Sarah Schulman:

“I have been in antiwar demonstrations with Catholics who actively fight against abortion rights, which I consider to be essential to female autonomy. So the only reason that sharing a common outrage with Hamas at the killings in Gaza disturbed me more than all the other religious fundamentalists I had had some moment of common ground with in the past was my own prejudice. Once that conceptual gap was faced, I examined the specifics. Hamas was democratically elected. It doesn’t matter what I think about Hamas. What matters is that my country, the United States of America, is providing military aid to Israel, who in my name is committing war crimes. So, consistent with my lifetime of work for justice, my responsibility regarding Israel is to speak out against what is being done in my name with my tax money. Period. It’s not always so clean, these decisions, but they still need to be faced.”

Both books obviously also focus on the LGBTQ section of Brand Israel.

Sarah Schulman:

“At this point I sat down and with help from the anti-occupation global activist community, amassed a year-by-year documentary guide to pink- washing so that the history and context of this emerging paradigm could be more easily understood and confronted. And the first thing that became clear, while doing this work, was that pink-washing was a direct product of Israel’s remarketing campaign: Brand Israel.”

Dr. Sa’ed Atshan:

“As Palestinians and as queer people, they name Zionism and homophobia, respectively, as the two primary reasons for their marginalization. Yet pro-Israel queer advocates such as Jayson Littman relegate Zionism to an “other issue” from LGBTQ rights. For queer Palestinians, Zionism and homophobia are fundamentally connected through ethnoheteronormativity. Queer Palestinian activists also experience the Zionist demand not to “single out Israel” as a lack of ability to even articulate the source of their oppression.”

An argument that is used often in discussions by those who want to defend the oppressive Israeli state is, that “Israel is being singled out” and that “Singling out Israel is inherently anti-Semitic.”

Sarah Schulman:

“This is the weakest argument in this entire debate, and the one repeated the most. People never claim that Israel’s action does not violate international law. That’s a given. They simply argue that to do so is all right because others do it as well. It is disheartening to see members of the opposition be so careless and knee-jerk. I want them to have good reasons for their positions.”

There is also this idea, especially among white liberals, of being afraid of being labeled anti-Semitic and that excuse is used to not stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people. Instead they choose to be ‘neutral’ and think that Jewish people are the only people who can critique Israel without being labeled anti-Semitic, although, as shown above, even Jewish people are labeled anti-Semitic for being critical of Israel.

Sarah Schulman:

“I cannot overstate how much I hate and disagree with this statement. And even as I write this a year and a half later, I am sick of hearing it. As far as I am concerned, most non-Jews are anti-Semitic, and this simple assertion of the secret threat of the all-powerful Jew to brand some innocent Christian with the label “anti-Semite” is a good example. They don’t seem to be afraid of being anti-Semitic on a wide range of other planes. Only when it comes to criticizing Israel are they suddenly controlled by the thought.”

Sarah Schulman also addresses how some institutions who receive funding refuse to work with or de-platform those who are critical of Israel, because they fear that they will lose their funding, even when there is no proof that they will. This is mainly based on the anti-Semitic trope that Jewish people control everything, especially finance.

Sarah Schulman:

“I started to realize that there was a strange new configuration at play. The leaders of the LGBT Center, most of whom were not Jews, appeared to believe, without evidence, that there was a contingent of rich, vengeful, punitive gay Jews—whose names no one seemed to know—that were funding all our LGBT institutions. That, if we continued to have free speech and open debate in our community, these unnamed punitive rich Jews would take their Jew money and shut down the community.”

By now I hope it is clear how important reading / listening to these two books is. They show that ignorance is a choice; that evidence-based opposition to specific present-day Israeli actions is not anti-Semitic prejudice; that some anxiety around criticising Israel is itself rooted in anti-Semitism; that solidarity around basic human rights doesn’t require agreement on all contentious issues; and that LGBTQ+ rights and Palestinian rights are not in opposition. Both books obviously discuss more than these topics. In Dr. Atshan’s book there is an entire chapter dedicated to LGBTQ+ Palestinians and their resistance, Sarah Schulman talks in detail about her part in the first LGBTQ+ delegation from the United States to Palestine organised by Al-Qaws and Aswa, which took place in 2011 (which was co-led by Dr. Atshan). Schulman also talks about the anti-occupation queer Israelis she met and Dr. Atshan about how queer Jewish Israelis are one of the most vigourous and vocal supporters of Palestinian queers. The usage of the term apartheid to describe Israel is also discussed in both books, alongside the boycott movement against South Africa’s apartheid regime, and the role that news media and films play, to name a few.

I’d like to end with this passage from Sarah Schulman’s book:

How did the Europeans, who caused the pain in the first place, get off scot-free, while the Palestinians, who had nothing to do with it, ended up paying the price?

Here are things you can and in my opinion should do and tell your family and friends to do:

Buy both books through your local bookshop or get them directly from the publisher. I’d recommend reading / listening to Sarah Schulman’s book first.

Israel/ Palestine and the Queer International by Sarah Schulman, Duke University Press (2012)

Queer Palestine and the Empire of Critique by Dr. Sa’ed Atshan, Stanford University Press (2020)

News from Berlin and Germany: 12th June 2021

Weekly news roundup from Berlin and Germany


11/06/2021

Compiled by Ana Ferreira

 

NEWS FROM BERLIN

Former VW boss faces charges in Berlin

Martin Winterkorn stepped down as VW boss in 2015 after the scandal known as “Dieselgate”. Now, prosecutors in Berlin have brought charges against him, of giving false testimony to the German parliament about his knowledge of the carmaker’s emissions scandal. In a separate case, VW said on last Wednesday it was facing fresh charges in France. In February, the court dropped market manipulation charges against Winterkorn; however, he must still face accusations of fraud. Prosecutors chose to pursue the fraud charges, which carry a heavier possible sentence. Volkswagen has so far paid worldwide more than €30 billion in legal fees and recall charges. Source: dw

NEWS FROM GERMANY

Left and centre lose in Saxony-Anhalt

The state election in Saxony-Anhalt was more than a damper for the parties to the left of the CDU/CSU. The SPD, the Left (die Linke) and the Greens (die Grünen) together got just 25 per cent. This is bitter for all those who hope that something could happen. The last major mood test before the Bundestag elections shows that the centre-left is currently failing to mobilise majorities. Yet left-wing issues are capable of winning majorities. Most people are critical of housing policy in Germany; seven out of ten were in favour of a rent cap in autumn 2020, for instance. Source: taz

“Such a tweet is a real honeypot for green-left agitators”.

Hans-Georg Maaßen, CDU candidate for the Bundestag, sent shock waves through the political discourse landscape with a tweet. He wrote: “Annalena Charlotte Alma Baerbock = ACAB = All Cops Are Bastards. Coincidence or cipher?” In this context, he referred to a report that Baerbock wanted security agencies to check for right-wing extremist groups. CDU Secretary-General Paul Ziemiak said: “This tweet is impossible, unspeakable.” He added: “This is also not our level, not my level.” Maaßen said he has not mean anything serious. Maaßen is running for a Bundestag mandate for the CDU in southern Thuringia. Source: Tagesspiegel

Another step towards the surveillance state

In a few months, Federal Interior Minister Horst Seehofer will retire from politics. But this does not mean that Seehofer is already a “lame duck” in politics. Rather, after long internal debates, he has now pushed through a bill in the coalition with the SPD. It concerns the future of the Federal Police. According to this, the police will soon be able to use state Trojans against people who have not yet committed a crime. These state Trojans are based on malware that is smuggled in via security holes. Secret services and the police therefore need open security holes in devices such as mobile phones. Source: nd

Abortion still illegal in Germany after 150 years

Paragraph 218 of the penal code is a sad record holder. It became part of (West) German law 150 years ago and feminists protest against that for just as long. It obliges women to give birth. Those who do not want to do so have to go through a legally imposed gauntlet to terminate a pregnancy. If the situation is (a bit) better in big German cities, in areas of the countryside, it might not have, for instance, a single female doctor for months who performed abortions up to the legally permissible twelfth week. Women often drive hundreds of kilometers to find a practice. Source: nd

Election campaign ignores the poor

They are invisible, people in poverty. In the election campaign, they want to change that. They are supported by the Protestant organisation Diakonie. Being poor means indeed constantly improvising. The standard rates in the basic income support system are too tight, so that any unforeseen expense can threaten one’s existence. Before the pandemic, food banks, day centres, cultural offers that can be taken advantage of with little or no money were important to have social contacts at all – in the pandemic, this has also fallen away. Diakonie said it would support those affected and promote their self-organisation and networking nationwide. Source: jW

Racism and Nationalism in Sport

It’s Great That England’s Footballers Are Taking a Stand against Racism, but I Still Won’t Be Cheering Them on the Pitch


10/06/2021

The 2020 football European Championship is finally upon us, and sport is moving to the digital equivalent of the front page. It is timely, then, that two new stories have emerged which show the effect of racism on English sport.

Cricketer Suspended for Racist Tweets

First, there’s the cricket. England bowler Ollie Robinson was suspended after old tweets of his were found, including those which said: “My new Muslim friend is the bomb;”, “I wonder if Asian People put smileys like this ¦) #racist;” and “The guy next to me on the train definitely has Ebola.”

The establishment rushed to Robinson’s defence. Oliver Dowden MP, Secretary of State for Sport, called for the suspension to be lifted, saying “Ollie Robinson’s tweets were offensive and wrong. They are also a decade old and written by a teenager. The teenager is now a man and has rightly apologised. The ECB has gone over the top by suspending him and should think again.” Dowden was supported by prime Minister Boris Johnson

In contrast, my old friend, the Liberation Theologist Dr. Anthony Reddie, commented:

“Maybe I have missed something here about the Ollie Robinson situation. 1st, he was 18, not 10 or 5. 2nd, he made racist and sexist remarks; remarks that were as repugnant then as they are now, as they were when I was aged 18, a long time ago. It’s not as if he was living in an epoch that had different values and perspectives (the excuse White historians make for racist actions and statements made during the age of empire and colonialism). I find it irritating, therefore, that we are STILL talking about education for White people about racism. 9 years ago was 2012, not 1812 or even 1912…

So we continue to make excuses for White people holding views that no one has any excuse to hold at this juncture in history. We’ve had a Race Relations act in 1965, an updated act in 1968, another Race Relations act in 1976, an amended act in 2000 and an Equality Act in 2010. When are we going to stop making excuses for White people making racist statements?”

England Football Team Continues to Take the Knee

Meanwhile in football, England manager Gareth Southgate is insisting that his footballers take the knee at the beginning of games. This is despite Tory MP Brendan Clarke-Smith comparing the act to the England squad giving the Nazi salute at a 1938 game in Berlin. The main establishment paper, The Times also called taking the knee a gesture which “has become meaningless and divisive”.

Some racist fans have responded by booing England footballers when they take the knee. Black Nottingham Forest player Lyle Taylor joined the abuse, saying that he has stopped taking the knee because it means supporting the “Marxist group” Black Lives Matter. Taylor’s understanding of Marxism seems a little confused, as later in the interview his main criticism of BLM seems to be that it’s supported by “massive, massive corporations”.

Boris Johnson has refused to commit himself. His spokesman issued an ambiguous statement saying “the prime minister fully respects the right of those who choose to peacefully protest and make their feelings known … On taking the knee, specifically, the prime minister is more focused on action rather than gestures”.

One of Johnson’s MPs, Lee Anderson took a much clearer position, promising to boycott England games. He posted on Facebook: “For the first time in my life I will not be watching my beloved England team whilst they are supporting a political movement whose core principles aim to undermine our very way of life.”

Taking the Knee – Part of a Proud Tradition

Southgate is right. Taking the knee is part of a proud tradition of people in sport taking a stand against oppression from Muhammad Ali refusing to fight in Vietnam to John Carlos and Tommie Smith making the black power salute at the 1968 Olympics.

Taking the knee in sport is most identified with (American Football player) Colin Kaepernick. At a pre-season game in August 2016, Kaepernick refused to stand for the US national anthem as a protest against police racism. He justified his action by saying “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color.”. Less than a week later, he also started taking the knee.

Kaepernick’s stance was taken up by other prominent athletes like LeBron James, Serena Williams and Megan Rapinoe. More importantly, perhaps, it crystallized a growing mood of anger against violent police racism, and when George Floyd was murdered in May 2020, sports stars taking the knee became almost ubiquitous, One could argue that this has helped normalise the righteous anger, but the visible participation of beloved sports stars has contributed to a climate in which Defund the Police has suddenly become a mainstream demand.

Besides, this was not just a gesture on the part of Kaepernick, who has been forced to pay for his actions. Then-president Donald Trump called for National Football League owners to fire any player who takes the knee. This is effectively what has happened to Kaepernick. Despite being one of the most gifted quarterbacks of his generation, he has been frozen out of the game and has not played in well over 4 years.

Sport is Political

For those calling for politics to stay out of sport, I’m afraid that that ship has already sailed. Sport is part of the superstructure of society. This means that in a neoliberal society, the rich oligarchs and corrupt regimes who own clubs will try to make fans pay as much as possible. And in a society which is imbued with racism and nationalism, this racism and nationalism will also be found in sport.

Black England player John Barnes noted that after he scored a wonder goal in England’s 2-0 defeat of Brazil, a section of English fans around the National Front “kept saying ‘England only won 1-0 because a nigger’s goal doesn’t count’”. In 1995, a friendly between Ireland and England was abandoned after a riot by racist English fans. Although the racism and fascism that used to accompany England games is not as visible as it used to be, we still often endure the nasty odour of nationalism.

When England play Germany, England fans regularly sing “Two World Wars and One World Cup” – which Wikipedia quaintly explains as being “part of the England-Germany football rivalry.” And yet this harking back to England’s imperial past, when “we” were capable of winning both wars and football matches, smacks of a pathetic nostalgia for the days when inhabitants of other countries (and Black Britons) knew their place.

Nationalism in German Sport

Every 2 years there’s an international football competition, be this the European Championship or World Cup. Around this time, every other house or car in England seems to be festooned with the St George’s Flag, which is otherwise mainly seen at the head of a Nazi demonstrations. If this feels intimidating to me, I shudder to think how it would affect the victims of everyday racism.

When I first moved to Germany in 1995, the atmosphere was quite different. In Euro 96 — maybe the high point of laddish English nationalism — there was nary a German flag to be seen. The memory of Nazi rule made many Germans somewhat reticent to openly display too much national pride.

Then 2006 happened. Germany hosted the World Cup, fan miles were erected and suddenly flags were everywhere. Most of this was “harmless fun”, and yet there was a definite change of mood. Suddenly Germans felt able to do what the Brits had done for centuries and celebrate their nation.

In 2007, the “citizen’s movement” pro-NRW was formed as a dubious collection of Nazis and “concerned citizens”. Many of the members of pro-NRW found their way into Pegida and the AfD. Three years later, former Berlin finance minister Thilo Sarrazin (SPD) published the best-selling book Deutschland schafft sich ab, in which he raged against immigrants, Jews and Islam.

Now of course there is no causal relationship between flags at football tournaments, social democratic racism and the worrying growth of far right parties, but the removing of taboos about talking about national pride helped contribute towards a climate in which Sarrazin was lauded and openly racist parties could grow.

Nationalism after Brexit

The European Championship is England’s first tournament post-Brexit, where both sides of the main media discussion showed an unhealthy obsession with the place people happened to be born. One side championed “Great” Britain (usually used as shorthand for England), while the other cheered for Europe – the same Europe that is sending troops into Mali and treating refugees with racism and imprisonment.

This debate has been accompanied by equivalently bland political slogans. As the wealth of the ultra rich rose astronomically, David Cameron insisted “we’re all in it together”. Meanwhile, following the removal of Jeremy Corbyn, new Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has wrapped himself in the Union Flag in an attempt to push a political vision in which nation trumps class.

Supporting “our boys” in the football isn’t the worst possible sin, but it’s part of the same process of saying that I’m essentially the same as my boss, or my landlord, or my prime minister, because we’re all “English” in a way that people from ‘less civilized’ countries are not.

This is not, by the way, the same as supporting your local team – especially in an England whose history is so tied up to imperialism. I support Bradford City, the team from the industrial multi-racial city in which I grew up. The last (and only) time they won any significant trophy was the 1911 FA cup.

For a couple of years (literally two) at the turn of the Millennium, City were in the Premier League. In the first season, when they finished 17th, one place above relegation, the local paper produced a supplement called “Heaven Seventeenth”. Since then, after the Chairman ran off with most of the money, the team has spent most of its time in the third and fourth divisions.

No sane City fan would call the team the best in the world. Compare and contrast with the way in which the England team is treated. Despite not having won any serious trophy in over 50 years, every tournament is preceded with hype that this is “our” year, followed by accusations of dirty foreigners and cheating referees when the team inevitably crashes out.

Such hubris is not unconnected to the way in which history is taught in British schools. “We” owned a third of the world, “we” single-handedly won two world wars, “we” ruled over an Empire in which racism and slavery were just unfortunate mistakes – or more likely, are not mentioned at all. Is it any wonder, that the English always seem convinced that “their” team is superior to all others?

But This Time it’s Different”, isn’t it?

But is this England side different? Never one to stop flogging a dead horse, Billy Bragg claims that Southgate’s behaviour reminds us of ‘what it means to be a progressive patriot’. Recently, Bragg reposted an “evocative” statement from Southgate on Facebook.

Addressing potentially racist England fans, Southgate wrote “Regardless of your upbringing and politics, what is clear is that we are an incredible nation — relative to our size and population — that has contributed so much to the arts, science and sport. We do have a special identity and that remains a powerful motivator.”

On one level, this is so much more than the bland statements that we have come to expect from football managers. Yet it still contains many of the same flaws that show up in Bragg’s notion of “progressive patriotism”. As I have argued elsewhere, ‘why should “standing up for the traditional value of fairness’ be seen as a specifically British quality? Are Britons really more fair than Iranians or Iroquois?”

Bragg assumes that Southgate’s act of solidarity – like that of the US-American Kaepernick can somehow be attributed to his nationality, as, presumably can the Maoism of former German player Paul Breitner or the socialism of ex-Brazil captain Socrates. Yet it is just not the case that all Englishmen – or US-Americans, Germans or Brazilians – would behave in the same way. I’ve already given enough examples of Tory MPs to show that this is simply not the case.

Having said this, we do live in interesting times. Former footballers like Stan Collymore and Neville Southall and current players like Marcus Rashford have done more to challenge Boris Johnson’s neoliberal politics than the “leader” of Britain’s Labour “opposition”.

For this reason, I want Rashford to score a hat trick in every game. There is one condition, though, and this is that England lose each of these games 4-3.

News from Berlin and Germany: 5th June 2021

Weekly news roundup from Berlin and Germany


04/06/2021

Compiled by Ana Ferreira

 

NEWS FROM BERLIN

Demonstration for cyclists’ rights

The Berlin branch of the Allgemeiner Deutscher Fahrrad-Club (ADFC) has called for a rally next Sunday. The aim is to demonstrate for a quick traffic turnaround in which the concerns of cyclists are given more attention. A total of 16 routes are planned across all districts, all with the Große Stern in Mitte as their destination. Afterwards, there will be a joint ride to the Brandenburg Gate, where a final rally will take place. For some of the routes, the city motorway 100 as well as the Avus stretch on the A115 will be closed in the meantime. Source: rbb

NEWS FROM GERMANY

Collaboration between CDU and AfD

The election of Max Otte as chairman of the CDU-affiliated Werteunion has met strong criticism in many quarters. In the past, Otte drew attention to himself with AfD-friendly statements. In 2017, for example, he announced in an interview he intended to vote for the AfD in that year’s Bundestag elections. But it is not only the election of Max Otte as the new Werteunion chairman that is causing a stir regarding the relationship between the CDU and the AfD. In the run-up to the election in Saxony-Anhalt, where the AfD could replace the CDU as the strongest force, the local CDU’s dealings with the AfD are under criticism. Source: fr

Solidarity with the junge Welt

The orders in the last three weeks have shown it: around 400 people have recognised the scandalous process and supported junge Welt quite practically with a subscription. One would like to think that German media would be just as prudent and recognise the harassment of the daily newspaper junge Welt as a possible gateway for tighter control of all media in this country. Many vehicles of the international media showed support to jW. For no one knows who will be harassed tomorrow by the German domestic secret service because of a disagreeable attitude in reporting. Source: jW

Teachers give out books containing racist language

The short story “A Beautiful Relationship” was given to a pupil in a German school. The story is from the 1980s, and contains the N-word. The pupil confronted the teacher about the text: “It’s 2021 now, why can’t school texts just use the politically correct term for Black people?”. There was nothing she could do about it and it was not her responsibility, replied the teacher. The choice of words in the assignment is not the only thing the pupil finds problematic, however. “I would have preferred my teacher to take me seriously and acknowledge that the text is hurtful to me.” Source; taz

German cities are too dirty

The EU Commission sued Germany because the annual and hourly limits for nitrogen dioxide have been exceeded in numerous areas since 2010. Germany is thus systematically violating the EU Air Quality Directive. However, air quality in German cities has improved recently, partly because of the Corona crisis. Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) already stated the judgement from Luxembourg had “fundamental and far-reaching significance in the fight for clean air”. However, the association regretted the ruling came more than ten years after the limit values came into force. Since 2011, DUH has pushed through measures such as improvement of public transport, as well as speed limits of 30 km/h. Source: taz

Climate movement mobilises against motorways

The protest about the construction of the A14 is flaring up again. The climate movement plans to demonstrate in Wittenberge on Saturday. Activists want to travel to the bridge by boat or bicycle and there will be a demonstration from the train station in Wittenberge. For a long time, it was quiet about the A14, but after the BUND regional associations of Brandenburg and Saxony-Anhalt agreed to a settlement in 2019 and stopped further lawsuits, the motorway construction is considered to have been pushed through and the alternative concept – an expansion of the existing federal roads instead of building a new motorway route – to have failed politically. Source: taz