The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

The fight for reproductive rights in Poland

Interviews with Dziewuchy Berlin, Zuzanna Dziuban and Anna Krenz   Why is this topic important to you? AK: As a Polish citizen, I am concerned about the political development in my homeland. I have many friends and family (and a house) as well as work partners in Poland. Therefore I am very interested in political, […]


17/11/2020


Interviews with Dziewuchy Berlin, Zuzanna Dziuban and Anna Krenz

 

Why is this topic important to you?

AK: As a Polish citizen, I am concerned about the political development in my homeland. I have many friends and family (and a house) as well as work partners in Poland. Therefore I am very interested in political, economic, health and cultural changes. In recent years the situation has become dramatic, as the PiS party has a parliamentary majority. Now nationalists walk down the streets and beat people up, as the church has become a bastion of hatred and hypocrisy. I love my homeland Poland, even though Poland does not love me. As a woman, I get really angry, when other women are being robbed of their basic human rights. As a feminist – I need to act!

Polish society has been divided – again, this time not on land as in historical times, over 200 years ago. But now the division is based on political views and runs through families and friends. This division will not disappear anytime soon. In the meantime, the government and other political (conservative / catholic) forces are destroying democracy and robbing people of freedom and basic rights. This all has gone too far at the moment.

ZD: I am an activist with ‘Ciocia Basia’, an informal, Berlin-based feminist collective, which supports people in Poland, and other countries where abortion is illegal, in gaining access to abortion in Germany. Ciocia Basia has existed for over 5 years and I have been active in the group for almost 3 years. My involvement in the group has political grounds: I believe that each and every person should have the right to decide over their own body and should have access to basic reproductive rights. Abortion is a human right.

I came from Poland and living in Germany means that, unlike in Poland, I can have access to abortion on demand up to 14 weeks – a privilege that people in Poland don’t have. I feel it is our responsibility and obligation to share this privilege with all those who don’t have it. It is a question of solidarity.

To be sure, I don’t agree with and I oppose restrictions on abortion in place in Germany, but still a 14 weeks limit is better than nothing. Access to abortion in Poland was almost entirely criminalized even before the recent decision of the constitutional tribunal. It was not illegal in only three situations: in case of rape; in case of risk to pregnant person’s life or health; and in case of severe fetal abnormalities. What this meant is that only 1% of actual abortions performed by people in Poland were carried out according to the restrictive law. All others, an estimate of around 100.000 a year, was carried out abroad, with the help of groups such as Ciocia Basia, at home with abortion pills, or in so called abortion underground. The new decision amounts to a total ban on abortion.

This does not mean that people won’t have abortions. They will. Many of them will be accommodated by abortion support groups abroad.

ZB: We want to raise awareness on the political situation in Poland through appearance in mass media, protests, actions, performances and collaboration with other feminist groups in Berlin. We also support Polish feminist organizations in their actions. Especially now, solidarity is crucial.

The Polish government has now delayed implementing a court ruling which would effectively ban abortion. How big a victory was this?

ZD: I find it very difficult to consider this a victory. It is just a postponement of a sentence aimed at waiting out, and containing the anger and resistance. Moreover, although the law has not yet been implemented, it has already had real consequences. Hospitals are canceling procedures or refusing to perform them. People who still have the right to legal abortion are looking for options abroad because a chance of finding a hospital or a doctor ready to go against the law that is not yet in power, are minimal.

To frame this as a victory means to misinterpret the reality on the ground. And it’s also politically useful for the proponents of anti-abortion laws. The ruling party already speaks about new ideas of abortion “consensus” making use of the fact that, from the point of view of the ban of abortions based on embryopathological (i.e. congenital malformations – ed) grounds, all softer options would look better. But they don’t and won’t.

Abortion activists and many people in Poland are not interested in and won’t be satisfied by any “consensus” proposed now by politicians. Abortion should be safe, legal and accessible – on demand. Whatever they offer now is simply not enough.

AK: It ain’t no victory at all!

The court ruling was not published, but that does not matter at all. Back in 2015, Prime minister Beata Szydło did not publish court ruling of the previous constitutional tribunal (not the latter fake one) – and still these rules went into power. This does not matter, that they did not publish the court sentence. [Editor’s note: you can read more about the 2015 Polish Constitutional Court crisis here]

The only kind of victory might be that PiS is now falling apart, divided into the more fanatic members who are against abortion, and want to ban it completely – and people who would rather keep the “compromise” or just keep it quiet (Kaczyński).

DB: We did not win, the war is not over. The delay does not mean that it will not be implemented at a later date. Our current government is defining its very own rules and therefore their actions are unpredictable. At the time the Constitutional Tribunal announced its decision, people who were awaiting abortion on embryopathological grounds were sent home. They are already being denied the medical help they need. And you cannot pause a pregnancy. Nobody cares about those people now.

Moreover, due to the pandemic traveling abroad is now more difficult, so many abortions will be executed underground, at home, without taking required hygiene measures. This will now increase.

It is not a victory and arguably international media reporting it as such is exactly what PiS and their allies want.

What is the scale of the protests in Poland? What forms of action are being used?

AK: Protests have been taking place since 22.10. 2020. These are large demonstrations with hundreds of thousands of people, in big and small cities, in towns and villages. This is massive. People go to the streets almost every day. There were marches, demos, blockades, bicycle rallies, car rallies. People are making a lot of protest art, they screen images onto buildings, the creativity is endless, as it usually is in Poland.

DB: Since October 22nd, people have been out in the streets. Mass protests have been taking place all over Poland in big cities and small towns alike. The biggest protest so far happened on October 30th, where about 150,000 people blocked Warsaw. We are not giving up. We have to act and we have to be smart about it.

The pandemic is accelerating once again and there are regulations that limit our ways of protesting. We are trying to come up with various forms of protests: walks, demonstrations, performances, online solidarity actions, reaching out to other feminist groups, networking with activists in Poland, etc.

ZD: The scale is massive and this is truly moving. It has already been said that this is the biggest protest movement since the 1989 transition. It cuts across all strata of Polish society, all social and age groups. And it’s not limited to major urban centers but unfolds too, in small cities and rural areas. In this sense it is really unprecedented. In most cases the protests take form of illegal mass demonstrations which take places virtually every day and sometimes gather over 100,000 people as was the case in Warsaw. But I also very much appreciate the small-scale guerrilla actions performed in the cities. These cover walls and benches with stickers informing about access to medical abortion, where to order pills and how to take them, or abortion support groups.

In December 2019, Ciocia Basia joined a pan-European initiative, ‘Abortion Without Borders’, with abortion groups in Poland, UK, and the Netherlands. Since the beginning of the protests following the announcement of the verdict of the constitutional tribunal, the number of the Polish helpline of the initiative has become the most often chanted and sprayed phone number in Poland. This is important because amidst all the anger and fear the situation has created, the demonstrators in Poland carry the message of hope and resistance. The politicians and lawmakers may ban abortion in Poland but abortion will still be possible – just call this number – and you will be offered practical support.

What people are shouting in the streets is that we are taking back our reproductive rights, regardless of the inhumane legislation. I think many learned the lesson from the protests performed earlier this year by queer activists in Poland. In face of such severe violations of civil and human right, there is no space for dialog or negotiations on somebody else’s terms. It has to be made clear that enough if enough but also that we can count on each other.

The Berliner Zeitung has called Berlin the “hotspot of the Polish resistance”. How have you managed that and what have you been doing?

AK: I disagree with the article and especially the word “hotspot”. If the author googled a bit, he’d knew that 2016 was the hotspot moment, when 2000 people came to Warschauer Brucke for the Black Protest. I think it started back then. And these 4 years make a difference. Life and the world change so rapidly that even these 4 years are a lot.

In the meantime, we protested – almost every month there was an action or demo. We did not have so many from the Polish diaspora attending – but that is how it is – the majority is interested only when really big shit happens. The energy and anger comes from Poland, like a huge wave. But it is not only the big, the loud and the angry, that makes a successful protest. It is also the daily unseen work, making connections, making the boring things.

I would rather see this moment as another step, another chapter in a rather long Polish activist history of Berlin. It started (well, even before) but in the 1980s, when local Berlin chapters of Solidarność organised demos, exhibitions and physical help for Poland. Forgetting that chapter is kind of… not maybe disrespectful but ignorant. That history and the people who were active then, and who work with us today – it is only a cool heritage, an enrichment, and respect to history of the Polish diaspora.

I am one of the organisers of the 2-week-long Bloody Weeks, and many actions before. In 2017, I organised an exhibition in the Berlin gallery Schau Fenster, showing recent protest artefacts but also photos from the 1980s, from members of Solidarity, and I was happy to include their newest protest photos too.

I agree that Berlin is a hotspot for the Polish resistance, but it did not pop up yesterday. It has been a long work and process, which the author ignores. The only thing he mentions about us, organisers, is that it was not us who painted the U-Bahn. Shallow journalism.

ZD: There are very many Polish people who are politically engaged people and living in Berlin. It is not a surprise that in a moment like this they are taking their rage and solidarity to the streets. But this political engagement has, over many years, translated into variety of initiatives, groups and projects directed at support of discriminated groups in Poland, be it LGBTQ+ communities, minorities, or those structured around reproductive rights.

Ciocia Basia has been active for years and on a daily basis, through practical activisms, fights for the right of people from countries where abortion is illegal, to access safe abortions. Even though we are very busy now, we feel that it is our obligation to speak at the demos and simply be there because access to abortion and reproductive rights are at the heart of our political activism.

DB: Our collective started in 2016, when the first Black Protests were happening. So we are not new to activist work. Each member of our collective has a unique background, some have more experience in activist work, some have more proficiency in performative art, others are politically active. We all use our best skills to reach out to people to not only show our solidarity and support, but also to give them a safe space, where they can let out their frustration and anger. We want to invite people to find a way of protesting that suits them – and the diaspora is huge in Berlin – so we have kind of taken it on us to channel people’s frustrations.

After a couple of years of our existence on the Berlin activist scene, we have collected some contacts to people working in media, politicians, social workers, experts, artists, and more. This has helped us establish a network of people that oscillate around topics that in various degrees are connected to Poland.

And although our name means ‘Gals4Gals‘, everyone is welcome to attend our actions or become a volunteer. We are open, diverse and authentic, maybe that is why we get support from the people around us.

The Polish media has also reported a fair bit on our activities, but that is because the head of the Constitutional Tribunal, Julia Przylebska, lives in Berlin – being married to the Polish Ambassador to Germany. So we have paid her a few visits to not let her escape to her comfortable existence in Dahlem after having set fire to Poland. Maybe this is part of the reason, as our activities here have also been very direct, and not just in solidarity with what is going on in Poland.

Are the protests just for choice or are they against other politics of the PiS government?

ZD: Yes, this is something that worries me a bit, the fact that the protests gradually loose focus on reproductive rights and became about the PIS and all the failed policies the government has implemented over the years. I totally understand that, as mass protests, they had to spread to accommodate multiple perspectives on abortion, and there are many incompatible positions even within the opposition. Some go to the streets to demand a return to 1993 “consensus”, some, as I do, to demand total decriminalization of abortion.

I am really happy to see that more and more people are leaning towards the second position – this is how it looks like, at least. But the decision of the constitutional tribunal has been for many just an incentive to protest the government, and some of those voices become louder than those of feminist activists, especially the voices of neoliberal and centrist male politicians. It would be lovely to have the PIS government overruled, the sooner the better, but not to end up in a situation which, from the perspective of the fight for reproductive rights, puts us back in a position from which we started: having to deal with restrictions imposed on our freedom of choice.

AK: Both and more. Abortion has always been a starting point, a spark, that flamed people’s anger and energy. It is not the first time, that people have go out onto the streets because of this. This spark – I also call it a ball, that little old men (Polish politicians) play. This spark always appears in difficult political times. Then, politicians take that ball, the society divides in to 2 groups (“teams”) and politicians can easily play against each other. It’s a shame, that it is about women’s bodies and souls. State patriarchy is so deep.

DB: Both. It is a complex issue, the frustration has been building up. The breaking point was the Polish Stonewall – a moment when LGBTQIA+ people started to fight back, protesting LGBT-free zones, which now make up half of the Polish territory, the abortion ban was the last straw. It concerns a bigger group of people. So now we are protesting not only the new regulations but we want to fight for our bodily autonomy, for the right to choose, for a judicial system that is not rigged by the ruling party, a state that is separate from the Catholic Church, the list goes on.

Sadly, there are people who do not understand the link between LGBTQIA+ right and the right to safe and legal abortion. Another thing is that some protesters are in the streets just to shout “fuck PiS”, but they do not care for the rights of people with uteruses and non-hetero-normative people. We cannot allow our message and the main cause of these protests to be lost in the chaos.

What has been the role of political parties and alliances like ‘Razem’ and ‘Lewica’?

ZD: From where I stand, I can hardly say that this is their protest and their revolution. What is unfolding in Poland is a bottom-up revolution of feminist and queers, very tired of being told how to protest and what to demand. This is not to say that some of the politicians, especially women from Razem and Lewica, haven’t been there with and for the protesters. But I think that on the level of policy and political courage there is still a lot to be done.

AK: Apart from organising demos, taking selfies, marching… not much. There were some symbolic actions in the Polsih parliament – like women MPs wearing rainbow dresses, like women MPs making loud statements… there is a new idea coming now – another bill for liberating abortion, nothing new, but the time is right. Both RAZEM and Lewica are too small to make a difference, since PiS has the majority. Therefore it is crucial that die LINKE and Razem work together, also with other opposition parties.

What Lewica failed to do is… to talk to simple people, to farmers… to workers… it is a huge group, but was completely forgotten by opposition. All of the oppositon. That is why it was so sad to see, when conservative nationalist party ‘Konfederacja’ takes these people over.

DB: This has been interesting. The parties all seem to be treading a line between supporting the movement, and with trying to score political points off it. Razem, as part of the ‘Left Coalition’ (Lewica), have been very present – the MPs have been joining in the strikes across the country from the very first day. Lewica’s women MPs did a couple of actions in parliament, one of which was a visual one where they gathered with the Women*’s Strike symbols, kind of a harking back to their Pride flag action over the summer. Just a few days ago they also co-founded the Legislative Initiative Committee alongside the Women*’s Strike organisation, FEDERA and the Women’s Rights Centre, which aims to put together legislative projects regarding the liberalisation of the abortion law (i.e. full legalisation), improving access to contraception, and sex education. It’s a coalition of several groups working on the ground, but Lewica is their parliamentary ‘liaison’ so to speak.

Some others have just been trying to score political points – such as the bafflingly popular Szymon Holownia and his ‘Polska2050 movement’, who has sort of supported the movement, while also saying he is personally against abortion…

In recent years, movements in Ireland and Latin America have successfully extended abortion rights. How much have you been inspired by these movements?

DB: As Dziewuchy Berlin we are collaborating with ‘Berlin-Ireland Pro Choice Solidarity’, who campaign against abortion bans and ‘Ni Una Menos Berlin’ – a feminist group of Latin American activists. They have fought for their rights and were successful. We learn from them and exchange our experiences with them, but also offer our support in their activities. In a way, there is a network of non-German activists based in Berlin, who fight for the rights of their people.

ZD: We have always been very inspired with the movements in Latin America. They have always been uncompromising, and I love them for it. And they thought us that solidarity around reproductive rights, very practical and unconditional solidarity, means more than the persistence antiabortion laws.

AK: I would say it was a mutual inspiration. After Black Protest and Women’s strike in Poland, similar actions took place in South America. Both South American countries and Ireland as well as Poland are countries with a large influence and presence of the catholic church. We were all inspiring each other especially with energy, slogans, methods of protests and visual aspects. There are many similarities (church as the “enemy”, similar women’s power, but also differences – local politics and structures.

What is the next step in the campaign and how can people outside Poland help?

ZD: It is, obviously, very important to make the issue public, engage in political lobbying, take the solidarity with people in Poland to the streets. But as an abortion activist I see a great need for practical activism – for groups and people helping those in Poland to gain access to procedures. Every year around 1000 people had legal abortions in Poland, mostly those based on embryopathological grounds. Now they will need to go abroad to have procedures. It is a great task for us, for abortion support groups, to be able to accommodate them. I am sure that we will meet this with the help of new volunteers getting in touch in the last weeks, and many donations, which we receive from people, both in Poland and in Germany. This is, I would argue, a very important aspect of the help that could offered by people outside of Poland – abortions cost a lot of money and only when we have enough money, we can offer support to all in need.

Another great development is the establishment of new abortion support groups in other European countries. Already in September this year, a collective Ciocia Wienia was formed in Vienna, Austria, where abortion on demand is also accessible up to 14 weeks. Some of the rules pertaining to abortion are less strict in Austria – there is, for instance, no need to undergo an obligatory consultation 3 days before the procedure. Vienna will be an easier destination for people from Southern Poland, and – if one group is overwhelmed with the amount of work – we can help each other. Another support group, Ciocia Czesia, was established in the Czech republic. This mobilization of activists living abroad or being from abroad around reproductive rights of people in Poland is very moving and empowering. We take seriously the phrase, which permeated the protests in Poland, “you will never walk alone”.

DB: The war is not over, the protests are not over, the pandemic is not over either. We are currently looking closely at the situation in Poland and keep in touch with other feminist groups. At this point the situation is quite dynamic. On top of that, a new legislative project has been presented in Sejm – a part of the Polish parliament – Stop LGBT might limit queer rights even further. 200,000 people signed the motion, the Church has shown great support for the bill. We need to keep our finger on the pulse and act accordingly.

Our collective is preparing to organize the Fourth Bloody Week – we will not stop fighting, we might adjust our actions to the current global situation, but we will not stop, we will not be silenced, we will not allow anyone to trample our rights.

AK: We are starting the fourth Bloody Week, this time less street protests, as corona is taking its toll, people are slowly loosing power on the streets.

More infos soon.

How can you help?

  • make online solidarity campaigns,
  • write about the situation in Poland in your countries, use your local media
  • support Ciocia Basia and similar organisations
  • support your local Polish activists
  • remember that shit happens in other countries too, we need a more transnational campaign.

Interview partners: Dziewuchy Berlin (DB) – Gals4Gals Berlin: Polish queer-feminist collective, Zuzanna Dziuban (ZD): activist with Ciocia Basia, Anna Krenz (AK): Polish artist, architect and activist living in Berlin.

On Wednesday, 2nd December, the LINKE Berlin Internationals are organising a public meeting: The Conspiracy Against Choice: Why abortion rights are under attack in Poland, Brazil and the USA. A limited number of places are available to see the meeting “live” in Aequa in Wedding, and the meeting will be livestreamed.

The referendum for expropriation in Berlin

The struggle for the right to vote of migrants


Last month the Berlin Senate gave its legal approval to the proposed referendum on the expropriation of more than 200,000 units in the hands of large real estate companies such as Deutsche Wohnen, Vonovia or Akelius. In the coming months, the social movement behind the referendum, called Deutsche Wohnen & Co. Enteignen (Expropriating Deutsche Wohnen & Co.), will face the collection of around 175,000 signatures to make the referendum a reality.

These 175,000 signatures are 7% of the electorate in Berlin entitled to participate in a referendum, which is about 2.50 million people. However, the population is much larger: a total of 3.77 million. The count excludes not only people who have not reached the legal age, but also all those who, living in Berlin and despite being adults, do not have German nationality. Currently, the number of immigrants without German nationality stands at 758,000 people, of which about 100,000 are underage. That is to say, there are about 650,000 citizens of Berlin who do not have the right to vote in a referendum.

A city-state

In geographical terms, Berlin is a city like Madrid or Barcelona. However, in administrative terms, Berlin is a Land (the equivalent in Spain of an autonomous region). Citizens of Berlin who do not have German nationality do not generally have the right to vote. That is either in communal elections (to the city’s districts such as Mitte, Neuköln or Steglitz-Zehlendorf), or in Land elections (Berlin, in this case), or in Bundestag elections (the German Parliament). In the case of EU citizens, they are entitled to vote in communal elections (equivalent to municipal elections in Spain) by virtue of the Union’s agreements.

The referendum for the expropriation of housing from large real estate companies is being held throughout Berlin. Therefore the electorate is similar to that of the Land elections, in which no foreign citizen can vote.

Transforming the economic into the political

This is where the question arises as to how far a democratic society can leave 650,000 adults out of the right to vote in a referendum (including elections), on such a fundamental issue as the right to a roof over one’s head. But what is more: are not migrants those who, among others, are particularly vulnerable to the depredation of the large real estate companies?

The requirement of a nationality, i.e. an official document that entitles us to such basic rights to vote, is a protective mechanism of the system itself. By denying fundamental rights precisely to the people most at risk of exclusion, who have the most difficulty in raising their voices, the system protects itself. Nationality becomes a conservative instrument of the State, a legalisation of xenophobia that gives more rights of citizenship by luck. Such as the right to vote, to a person because he or she was lucky or unfortunate enough to be born in a particular place (ius solis). Or, even worse, by right of inheritance (ius sanguinis), as if it were a monarchy.

We, the 3.77 million people who live in Berlin, live it, enjoy it and suffer it, whatever our origin. We suffer from the housing problems as migrants like the rest of the citizens. Or even more, because of the communication and administrative barriers. That is why we have to turn the struggle for the socialisation of housing into the struggle of migration for its political rights as well, so that hundreds of thousands of people can express themselves politically on equal terms, in a world where population movements are increasing.

This referendum may mean the struggle to undermine two of the fundamental pillars of the current bourgeois states: on the one hand, profit based on private property (in this case rentier); on the other, the nation as an element of discrimination between peoples.

This article first appeared in Spanish on the www.mundoobrero.es and www.tercerainformacion.es Websites. Reproduced with the author’s permission

Stop Heimstaden: Tenants fight mega-sale of 4,000 Berlin flats

The residents of Neukölln’s Donaustrasse 107 were in fighting spirit. While they saw off the gloomy weather hanging over their garden party with Glühwein and colourful cakes, they also had a bigger problem to contend with: the grim prospect of falling into the hands of the Scandinavian housing company Heimstaden. “It’s not just about this […]


11/11/2020


The residents of Neukölln’s Donaustrasse 107 were in fighting spirit. While they saw off the gloomy weather hanging over their garden party with Glühwein and colourful cakes, they also had a bigger problem to contend with: the grim prospect of falling into the hands of the Scandinavian housing company Heimstaden.

“It’s not just about this one house, it’s about the sell-off of the cities. Buildings are the new gold,” said one of the tenants, who called herself Lila Fuchs.

Her house is one of 130 which, at the end of September, Heistaden announced it intends to buy. The company plans to spend €830m on a total of almost 4,000 flats.

The deal is so big that now Berlin’s governing Senate has got involved. A joint negotiation committee includes finance secretary Vera Junker (SPD), housing secretary Wenke Christoph (Die Linke), and urban development councillor Jochen Biedermann (Die Grüne). Their aim is to persuade Heimstaden to sign Abwendungsvereinbarungen – ‘avoidance agreements’. [These agreements allow the company to avoid the fate of having the sale blocked by the state, which has a right of first refusal (Vorkaufsrecht) under which it could step in and buy the houses into public ownership. In return the company has to make binding commitments to protect existing tenants — editor’s note.]

“Heimstaden has announced several times that it wants to be seen as a long-term owner and a good landlord in Berlin,” Wenke Christoph told ND. “By signing the Abwendungsvereinbarungen the firm can now put these words into action.”

Bernd Arts, a spokesperson for the company, said: “When purchasing residential buildings in Milieuschutz areas [designated neighbourhoods where special rules apply to protect existing tenants], Heimstaden is offering to sign wide-ranging Abwendungsvereinbarungen with the respective local authorities.

“Forthcoming discussions with politicians will show whether we’re going to find a solution that is acceptable for both sides,” he added.

The Green councillor Jochen Biedermann said that “so far there have been no offers that the district could accept.

“We’ll have to see what comes next,” said Biedermann.

Even exercising the right of first refusal over some smaller packages of buildings, which Heimstaden had already tried to buy this year, has not yet persuaded the company to compromise, according to the Green councillor.

“Central coordination [of the negotiations, which would otherwise be carried out separately by each district of the city] is a new way of doing things that will hopefully become a precedent,” said Gaby Gottwald, a Die Linke politician who sits on the housing committee in the German parliament.

“We mustn’t give an inch when it comes to Abwendungsvereinbarungen. If we start agreeing to special conditions for big institutional investors, we’ll destroy the power of the instrument.”

Katrin Schmidberger, the Green spokesperson for rented housing, said state-owned housing companies had a particular responsibility to make a contribution when it comes to the houses. “The whole governing coalition is now faced with the question of making new state money available,” she said, pointing out that the relevant pot is empty. Schmidberger said the coalition had to show that it “clearly rejects business models that are to the detriment of Berliners.”

In Neukölln alone, Heimstaden wants to buy 27 houses in Milieuschutz areas. For 16 of those, the deadline for the exercise of the right of first refusal is November 23rd. For the rest, there’s about a month more time.

“We suspect that part of the strategy of Heimstaden is to create uncertainty about the [Vorkaufsrecht] deadline,” said Luca Niefanger. “We are orientating ourselves around November 23rd.” He’s a spokesperson for the new coalition Stop Heimstaden, which is working on networking tenants across Berlin.

“It’s going quite impressively. The response is huge,” said Niefanger. Multiple demonstrations had been planned for the coming days. The biggest protest, which took place on Sunday in front of the main Berlin town hall, addressed not just Heimstaden but also the wider sell-off of cities.

“We demand the exercise of the right of first refusal and that politicians find solutions for all houses which are not covered by Milieuschutz,” said Niefanger. Indeed, only about half of the houses are able to benefit from Abwendungsvereinbarungen, he said.

There are, however, repeated examples of tenants winning the day. Take Mehringplatz, for example. On Monday, the state-owned housing company Howoge announced the acquisition of a high-rise complex from an investment fund run by the Luxembourg-based Optimum Asset Management SA.

“I opened a bottle of prosecco straight away,” tenant Daniela Berger told ND. After a negotiation process, a total of 372 flats at Mehringplatz 12-14, Friedrichstr. 246 and Wilhelmstr. 2-6 will now become property of the city. The tenants had alleged serious neglect of the buildings and many flats are said to have been left standing empty.

A delighted Pascal Meiser, a Die Linke parliamentarian said: “For the tenants around Kreuzberg’s Mehringplatz, who are in many respects in need of special protection, this decision finally brings security that they are not once again going to fall victim to ruthless profiteers.”

This report originally appeared in ND and is published here by kind permission of the author. Translation for The Left Berlin by Tom Wills.

Spanish tombs on the outskirts of Dresden and Berlin

We are located in Dresden, capital of Saxony, in what used to be the German Democratic Republic (GDR). Leaving from the north of the city, already where the houses end, we pass under a highway and to the left is the Heidefriedhof, one of the cemeteries that the municipality has.We enter and find a typical […]


We are located in Dresden, capital of Saxony, in what used to be the German Democratic Republic (GDR). Leaving from the north of the city, already where the houses end, we pass under a highway and to the left is the Heidefriedhof, one of the cemeteries that the municipality has.We enter and find a typical German cemetery, with a wide central walk and a dense wooded area on the sides scattered with tombstones.

After walking a few tens of meters along the central promenade, an obelisk with the initials of the Fédération Internationale des Résistants (FIR) is erected. It forms a cauldron from which flames rise. Below, a plate with a text in quite visible letters: “Zum Höchsten der Menschheit emporgestrebt” (Having aspired to the highest of Humanity). From this memorial, turning to the right, a monumental complex with a circular plaza and two promenades begins, which honors the struggle against fascism and reminds us of the horrors of war, an ode to peace and anti-militarism.

The collective tombs of anti-fascist fighters are located in one wing of the complex, the one closest to the FIR’s obelisk. Names are mixed in different languages, most of them are German. But we also find others such as Ángel Álvarez, Santiago Zamuz, Policarpo García-Suárez, Domingo Villanueva or Julio Aristizábal. What are these recorded names doing there? We follow the traces of Operation Bolero-Paprika.

On September 7, 1950, the French Republican Security Companies (CRS), a special police force, entered the homes of dozens of Spanish and Eastern European communists living in France. Thus began Operation Bolero-Paprika. Accused of disturbing public order or of being fifth columnists of the French Republic, they were expelled from the country. A pact between the United States, France and Franco’s Spain in the middle of the Cold War – sent many Republicans who had fought against fascism in Spain and France, against Franco and against Hitler, into a second exile.

A group of about 30 people arrived on September 10 at the border of the German Democratic Republic (GDR), where they began a new life that started in Schleiz and Malchow. Most would go to Dresden and Berlin. In the capital of Saxony, in March 1951, they left their autobiographies collected for the local authorities. This is now compiled in a book entitled “Y el año que viene – ¡En España!” edited by Margarita Banqué. Born in 1949 in France, she was the daughter of Bautista Banqué, one of the first 30 to be expelled. In this book, Ángel Álvarez relates that he was a candidate for deputy for Asturias of the Spanish Communist Party (PCE) in 1933 and then in 1936. He also says that in the GDR he was granted a 70% disability and that the doctors attended to his vertebrae and heart problems. Policarpo García, a furrier born in Madrid and later a partisan in the internal Resistance in France, was given a job by the GDR in the Sanar Eisenwerk ironworks in Cossebaude (Dresden).

One after the other, they tell us extensively about their lives. Their membership in unions and parties, their professions, the war in Spain and the fronts on which they fought, the positions and tasks they carried out for their organizations both in Spain and in exile. It follows their imprisonment in concentration camps in France, their struggle against Hitler in the French internal Resistance, and finally, their detention and deportation to the GDR. These are lives full of comings and goings, of double exile. They finally find a home for the family, a job for men and women, health care and education “on the other side of the wall”. Their experiences were forgotten for decades in an official historiography that silenced those who were communists and obscured everything that was happening “in the East”.

We are going from Dresden to Berlin, to the district of Treptow-Köpenick, southeast of the German capital. There, between the 96a highway, the S-Bahn tracks, the Spree river and the Britz Canal, is the Baumschulenweg cemetery. It has a double structure, split in two by the Kiefholzstrasse. On one side is the crematorium and several sets of graves, the old part, whose planning dates from 1911 contains black pages of history marking the incineration of 2,300 prisoners of the Sachsenhausen Concentration Camp in Oranienburg, north of Berlin. On the other side is the new part, planned and built between 1936 and 1939. In 1981 a granite and bronze monument by Gerd Thieme was erected there to honor the fighters against fascism and for socialism. At his feet, several rows of tombs contain the mortal remains of these people.

We find here Carmen Carrasco (born Carmen Ansorena), Antonio Carrasco, Francisco Rodríguez, Adela Lafuente (born Adela Fernández) and Manuel Lafuente. The latter, born in 1936, was deported with his sons Manuel and Fernando to the GDR. Fernando Lafuente still lives in Berlin today. Together with Margarita Bremer (born Margarita Banqué), editor of the book “Y el año que viene – ¡En España!”, they told recently their story for the German radio SWR. In his autobiography, Francisco Rodriguez tells us how he decided to get married for the second time in France after “long and deep meditation”. The autobiographies are not only an account of professional, trade union and political merits, they also tell us personal anecdotes like this one, sometimes even with a sense of humor. They remind us that they are not mere names, but flesh and blood people with their personal stories.

Among the Baumschulenweg tombs there is no longer the tomb of one of the most famous people expelled during Operation Bolero-Paprika: Elisa Uriz Pi (1893-1979). Pedagogue and revolutionary teacher, feminist fighter and international defender of children’s rights, Elisa received the expulsion order months after the first deportations and arrived in the GDR with a safe conduct. After a consultation with Sabine Gansauge, responsible for memorials at the cemetery, Elisa Uriz’s grave, No. 502, was removed in 2002. Three tombs away, at no. 499, however, remains the tomb of the renowned modernist architect Manuel Sánchez Arcas, along with those of María Krùs-Lobes (María Cruz López) and Celestino Uriarte, who was a leader of the PCE and the PCOE. These last ones arrived years later to the DDR, past the Bolero-Paprika.

Why is Elisa Uriz Pi not buried with the rest of the anti-fascist fighters in the operation? The most probable cause is because her death took place in 1970, before the memorial was erected in 1981. The dates of death of the rest of the Spaniards there were all later, except for Manuel Lafuente, who also died in 1970. In his case we can assume that the remains were moved to this place in 1983, when his wife Adela Lafuente died.

We turn around, leave the Baumschulenweg cemetery behind and change to Lichtenberg district. Near the station of the same name, to the left of Frankfurter Allee and walking east, is the Zentralfriedhof Friedrichsfelde. This cemetery is famous for housing the remains of Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Liebknecht, Franz Mehring or Ernst Thälmann, among others, in the Memorial of the Socialists.

Going deeper into the cemetery, among trees and tombstones, a brick stele with an inverted red triangle stands out. It marks the beginning of the rows of tombs containing the victims and people persecuted by the Nazi regime (inside or outside Germany), as well as those who fought in the Resistance. There we find a tombstone surrounded by carefully maintained vegetation that bears the names of Bautista Banqué and Teresa Banqué (born Teresa Doz). Their names are perfectly legible despite the passage of time thanks to the maintenance and cleaning work carried out mainly by the association VVN-BdA (Union of Persecuted People of Nazism – Federation of Antifascists, in its German acronym). Bautista and Teresa are the parents of the editor of the autobiographies – Margarita – who still lives in Berlin with the surname Bremer. They are the only victims of Operation Bolero-Paprika to be found here, although not the only people exiled. A few more rows in the background we find under a tree the tombstone of Josep Renau and Manuela Ballester, famous muralists, poster artists and communist painters, among other dedications. Also here were the remains of Josefa (Pepita) Úriz Pi, sister of Elisa Úriz Pi and outstanding pedagogue and leader of FETE-UGT, but her grave met the same fate as Elisa’s on Baumschulenweg.

All this history, as Margarita writes on the cover of her autobiography book, are “tesserae” of the historical memory. Their life is that little stone that goes unnoticed one by one, but which is in itself fundamental. Since each one composes the mosaic of the memory of those who fought fascism, whom history paid with such an unjust double exile for their communist membership. They are tesserae that, as archaeologists and narrators of memory, we unearth with care to bring them to light. We put them together one by one until we have the picture of a past that is only lost the moment we stop mentioning it and that deserves to be remembered. Only by knowing our history can we build the Third Spanish Republic, the one that many of the exiled communists in the GDR probably dreamed of seeing before they died.

This article first appeared in Spanish on the eldiaro Website. Reproduced with the author’s permission

Photo Gallery: Stop the sell-out of the city. We are reclaiming Berlin. 8 November 2020


09/11/2020