The Left Berlin News & Comment

This is the archive template

Germany: One Year of Accomplice to Genocide

Germany justifies its support for Israel because “it’s complicated”. After at least 40,000 deaths in Gaza, this argument is no longer viable


05/10/2024

Germany has stood out during the genocide of Palestinians as one of Israel’s main allies, both through its words and its actions. In its erratic supposed fight against antisemitism, in a flight forward from its genocidal Nazi past, the German state and part of German society have accepted the oppression and extermination of the Palestinian and now Lebanese people as collateral damage.

To justify Israel’s existence after World War II, Germany seems to not know or not want to know anything about the history and present of the region, especially Palestine. It does not even know how many people of Palestinian origin it has living within its borders, whether there are 10,000 or 80,000. For, true to the principles of a land without people for people without land, Palestinian migrants have, for decades, been considered legally stateless. And by not wanting to know, they do not seem to want to know about the genocide in Gaza, which politicians, journalists and too many people in the street are still denying that it is happening. Nor do they want to know about the occupation in the West Bank, which they constantly whitewashing, nor about the psychopathic escalation of violence against Lebanon, which they celebrate and legitimate comfortably from their sofas.

For all the wars and terrorist attacks carried out by the Zionist state since its founding are reframed in Germany as necessary acts of self-defence. Palestine, its occupation, apartheid, ethnic cleansing, countless war crimes and crimes against humanity, and now textbook genocide is an inconvenient reality for Germany, which has made the colonialist state of Israel its raison d’état. In its staunch defence of Israel in the international arena, Germany has for decades been one of Israel’s main arms exporters and one of its main diplomatic allies in the European Union and the UN.

In theory, guided by a well-deserved sense of guilt, Germany has linked its existence to that of Israel. But to external eyes this looks more like a desperate attempt to turn the page, from being the state that exterminates Jews to the state that most defends them. Come what may. What before 7 October meant turning a blind eye to crimes against humanity, now means closing one’s eyes, covering one’s ears and shutting the mouth of anyone who speaks out, all in the name of fighting antisemitism.

Domestically, they misinformed and manipulated history, creating a distorted image of Arabs in general, and the Palestinian, Lebanese and Iranian peoples in particular, as the new super antisemites, who are striving to massacre the Jewish people and do away with what Hitler could not. To that end, Palestinian and anti-Zionist voices were often purged from Germany’s media and educational institutions if they step outside the pre-established discourse, which sees Israel as the eternal victim and never the perpetrator. At the institutional level, for example, the German parliament in 2019 passed a non-binding resolution against the BDS movement with the CDU, SPD FDP and a large part of the Greens voting in favour for alleged antisemitism. Pro-Palestinian demonstrations and events, including last year’s commemoration of the 75th anniversary of the Nakba, were also often banned because of potential antisemitic incidents.

By repeating, in the most classic Nazi propaganda style, that Arabs, and more specifically Palestinians, and their cause are nothing more than ‘Jew haters’, the idea is being established in the population that the current antisemitism in Germany is brought by migrants, that it is imported antisemitism. This, on one hand, justifies the growing tsunami of xenophobia and Islamophobia, and, on the other hand, hides the dangerous, rising antisemitism and Holocaust denial of the German right wing.

The whole picture has been exacerbated since 7 October. Germany, which has been Israel’s second largest arms supplier since 2003, increased its arms exports tenfold in the following months. According to estimates by the Forensis and the Stockholm International Peace Studies Institute, after 7 October, 99% of the weapons Israel received came from the US and Germany, with 30% of these coming from Germany. Amongst the weapons sent by Germany are anti-tank bazookas, ammunition and tanks.

It has also multiplied its diplomatic support, being one of the few countries to have voted either against or abstained in all UN ceasefire votes. In the recent UN General Assembly vote to oblige Israel to comply with international law and end its occupation policy in Palestine within a year, Germany, of course, abstained. Not only that, but one of its representatives, when questioned at a press conference afterwards, lied, saying that the occupation and Israel’s withdrawal must be agreed. When corrected by the journalist, the spokesman said something we have been hearing for the past year: ‘it is complicated’.

Germany, moreover, is the only country to have joined Israel in its defence in the genocide trial brought by South Africa at the Court of Justice in The Hague. While South Africa has been backed by more than a dozen countries, mainly from the global South. It also tried to prevent the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant from being issued by sending its objections to the court. This has at least delayed the issuing of the warrants.

Germany was one of the first to cease its UNWRA funding in the Gaza Strip following Israel’s false accusations about its workers the day after the Hague Court of Justice ordered Israel to do everything possible to allow humanitarian aid into the area as part of genocide prevention. When these accusations were proven to be fabricated, and after weeks of the world’s NGOs and the UN itself warning of famine, it was one of the last countries to restore it, without a word of apology for having accused Palestinian workers of being terrorists without evidence. These accusations that continue to resurface every time Israel bombs a UNWRA school again.

Domestically, German politicians from all parties in the coalition government the Greens, SPD and Liberals, as well as the main opposition CDU and the ultra-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) express unwavering support for Israel, defending and justifying its actions. They call for and participate in demonstrations and events in support of Israel, while ignoring or banning pro-Palestinian ones.

There is also support for Israel on the German left. Several representatives of Die Linke have not only posed with the Zionist flag but have worn T-shirts of the genocidal Israeli army and waved its flag in their social networks, rallies and events. For example, during the campaign for the last European elections in the city of Halle, Die Linke, not only waved the flag of Israel, but also the flag of the criminal army on its information stand. One of its representatives together with a group of ‘leftists’ and with the help of the police blocked a legal demonstration in support of Palestine organised by students. This was only two weeks after an advisor of this party in the same city had to leave her post for participating in a demonstration calling for an end to the genocide. These incidents have not been condemned by her party leadership, which in 2011 was the first party in the German parliament to label the BDS movement as ‘antisemitic’ with stances “similar to those of National Socialism”.

It is shocking, to say the least, that at this stage of the genocide, after months of watching on our screens the burnt, dismembered, pulverised, rotten, eaten by animals, starved, tortured, flattened with steamrollers and decapitated bodies of men, women and children, that only 5 parties, and rather small ones, out of the 18 that were running in the European elections, called for a ceasefire and a halt to the sending of arms to Israel, and only 3 mentioned Gaza in their programmes and called for the recognition of the State of Palestine. This wilful blindness to international developments did not seem to detract votes from the pro-genocide parties, while pan-European parties such as Mera 25, which did have Gaza on its programme, did not get enough votes in Germany to send a representative to Brussels.

In recent weeks, Israel has intensified its attacks on the civilian population in Gaza, which is already on the edge of the abyss. It has also escalated its occupation and extermination in the West Bank, and now it pursues its expansive colonisation dream in Lebanon. German politicians and their subservient allied press are working hard to justify and even celebrate these attacks in the name of Israel’s alleged right to self-defence. German social media has been filled not only with articles admiring Israel’s prowess in its terrorist attack with beepers and walkie talkies, but with disgusting memes and jokes shared by politicians of almost all parties and journalists from the mainstream media.

With the ultra-right on a meteoric rise in recent state election campaigns, German politicians have decided to take the easy way out and instead of seeking real solutions to social problems, they are criminalising foreigners, especially Arabs, and becoming more openly racist by the day. Talk of remigration and border closures that used to come from Alternative for Germany has now been turned into reality by the supposedly moderate government coalition.

The dehumanisation and criminalisation of Arabs, both those living in Germany and those living in Middle Eastern countries, has been carried out with a level of propaganda of which Goebbels himself would be proud. In recent weeks ‘moderate’ politicians have made speeches calling Islam poison, blaming the state of health and education on an excess of migrants, and public institutions presented a Nazi propaganda-style video warning of the danger of Islamic radicalisation. They are clearly manufacturing consent, not only for the even more racist migration policies to come, but also for the expansion of the occupation and genocide that Israel obviously has in mind.

To this effect, German politicians and media serve as a mouthpiece for any and all of Israel’s lies. The Greens’ foreign minister Baerbock, at an event marking the 75th anniversary of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, claimed that she had seen with her own eyes a video of the rape of a woman on 7 October. The video is not even in possession of Israeli government sources or the UN task force that investigated such claims. Baerbock also claimed that Germany was no longer sending weapons and that those it had sent were for training purposes. Weeks later, Chancellor Olaf Scholz declared that they have not yet reached a decision to stop sending weapons, but right after added that “we have and we will”. They seem to be weeks away from creating their very own Ministry of Truth.

These claims they make about sending arms and what kind of weaponry will have to be proven true or not in the numerous lawsuits filed by Palestinian/German citizens in the country against various politicians and in the case filed by Nicaragua against Germany in the International Court of Justice at the Hague for complicity in genocide. Let us hope that some German leader also sits in the International Criminal Court at the Hague alongside their great ally, Netanyahu. Inshallah.

The press, both public and private, has played a major role in whitewashing Israel’s war crimes, as well as Germany’s role in them. All massacres and other war crimes are covered by public television in a criminally partisan manner. One example, out of hundreds, is the way that Tagesschau, a public daily news program, reports about one of the many massacres at a UNWRA school back in June:

“According to the Israeli army, numerous Hamas terrorists have been killed in an attack on a school in the Gaza Strip. UNRWA reports at least 35 dead. According to hospital reports, most of the dead are women and children. The Israeli army attacked a school building in the Gaza Strip where, according to the army, 20 to 30 members of the militant Islamist terrorist group Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) had been sheltering and using the school for their activities. The members of the terrorist groups had been in three separate classrooms at the school, located in the refugee neighbourhood of Nuseirat. Initial findings indicated that many of them had been killed in the attack, said military spokesman Peter Lerner  including terrorists who had been involved in attacks against Israel on 7 October. UNRWA: At least 35 fatalities The school is run by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). The death toll varies. The Hamas-controlled health authority stated that at least 30 people were killed in the attack. Hamas spoke of 40 fatalities. The Al-Aksa Martyrs’ Hospital in the city of Deir el-Balah said at least 37 people were killed, and an UNRWA spokeswoman told Reuters that there had been between 35 and 45 fatalities, but that the exact figure had not been confirmed. Hospital circles in the Gaza Strip also said most of the victims were women, children and young people. Another 50 people were injured. According to Palestinian sources, displaced persons had also sought refuge in the bombed building. Israel: No reports of possible civilian casualties: The Israeli military announced that the school had been observed in recent days. ‘The attack was postponed twice to avoid civilian casualties’, military spokesman Lerner said. The IDPs [internally displaced persons] were not in the targeted area, and the army was not aware of any possible civilian casualties as a result of the attack at this stage, he said. The conflicting statements of the warring parties cannot be independently verified. According to the Israeli military, this is the fifth known case within a month in which Hamas and PIJ terrorists have misused UNRWA facilities for their own purposes. ‘They use these facilities because they feel relatively safe,’ Lerner said. ‘This is extremely worrying for us.’ However, this does not stop the military from taking action against Hamas and PIJ.’”

This example defines the press of the last year: it’s all the fault of Hamas or Hezbollah, we can’t trust the death toll because it’s given by terrorists. People die, bombs fall, beepers explode, ignoring who is shooting or throwing bombs. They talk about the ‘people of Gaza’ avoiding naming Palestine, using the most neutral language, very different from the emotional and personal language they use when talking about the 7th of October. What Israel and its army say is always repeated, even if it is clearly propaganda. And always every day they have to mention the 7 October massacre and how many people were killed and kidnapped on that day. While they try to mention as little as possible the dead and wounded on the Palestinian and now Lebanese side. When the victims killed by the Zionist army are mentioned, only those of that day are mentioned, avoiding the cumulative death toll, and the mantra of the Hamas / Hizbollah-controlled health ministry is repeated, always casting doubt on the figures. Some public representatives and media repeat that there is no famine in Gaza and the dehumanising ‘conspiracy theory’ that what we see is a fabrication, that it is more like a movie produced by ‘Paliwood’, and that Hamas is responsible for the dead, both by action and inaction.

The press also demonises the entire pro-Palestinian movement both inside and outside Germany as violent antisemites who hate Israel almost because it is fashionable to do so. And the most prominent and visible activists of the movement are often singled out by name. This, in turn, feeds back to the police and politicians who, citing these reports, ban and/or break up demonstrations and events in an increasingly violent manner, which again became the front page of newspapers in this xenophobic and dangerous vicious circle.

The cancellations of events, films, books, people, and lectures are so many that an archive of silence has been created in which there are now hundreds of entries of the people cancelled. Among them are Ghayath Almadhoun, Nancy Fraser, Masha Gessen, Dr. Gassan Abu Sitta, Yanis Varoufakis and Hebh Jamal, to name but a few. Of those not invited in the first place because of their position or directly because of their Palestinian origin, there will never be a record. Although we know, for example, that Naomi Klein has not yet come to present her new book, if you have read it you know why.

It is noteworthy that this repression and censorship in the name of fighting antisemitism is being bizarrely ruthless with Jewish voices. Those who do not fit into most Germans’ imaginary of what it means to be Jewish and Jewishness. Images of the arrests of anti-Zionist Jewish people in Germany are going around the world. It is estimated that one third of the total number of people cancelled in this country are anti-Zionist Jews, the Jewish population in Germany being only 0.3% of the total. A large proportion of these cancellations have been at universities or activities organised and/or subsidised with public money, which points to a serious problem of deep-seated antisemitism in the German state and institutions. In November 2023, offering a room to Jewish Voice for Peace in the Middle East cost the cultural association Ouyun its funding. Shortly afterwards, Berlin police interrupted and tried to break up an event organised by Jewish women entitled “We have to talk” for using the word genocide. All of this demolishes the absurd idea that antisemitism in the birthplace of Nazism is imported from abroad.

The repression had international repercussions when, after months of trying to prevent it from happening, even going as far as freezing Jüdische Stimme’s bank account, and branding it as a gathering of the world’s Jew-haters, the police forcibly cancelled the Palestine Congress in Berlin after the first and only speech, that of Hebh Jamal, in case anything antisemitic was said. The congress was, however, co-organised by German, Jewish and Palestinian activists.

But these German Zionists are up against a resistant Palestinian solidarity movement that, despite state violence, continues to demonstrate and take to the streets, while gaining more and more public and self-managed spaces. With activists bravely standing up to the political shows that are the trials currently taking place, rather than acting with the prosecution.

There is also a shift in German public opinion, which is beginning to see the situation in Israel a little more clearly, not as the poor state of their grandparents’ victims, but as a state in the hands of out-of-control terrorist fascists, who will drag anyone who supports them into an endless and dangerous war. Perhaps the threat of all-out war will bring this silent majority out onto the streets.

News from Berlin and Germany, 2nd October 2024

Weekly news round-up from Berlin and Germany


02/10/2024

NEWS FROM BERLIN

Raid on pro-Palestinian scene

Berlin police searched the homes of five men last Monday morning. The men are suspected of having made pro-Palestinian offences, police and the public prosecutor’s office announced that. A total of 125 officers executed five search warrants in the districts of Friedrichshain, Britz, Gropiusstadt, Tegel and Schöneberg on behalf of the Berlin public prosecutor’s office. Mobile phones, computers and other data carriers were seized during the searches and are now being analysed. No arrests were made. The Berlin police were also deployed on Monday due to a pro-Palestinian blockade. According to the police, around 20 people blocked the entrances to the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. Source: tagesschau

 

NEWS FROM GERMANY

Green Party leaders Ricarda Lang and Omid Nouripour resign

The Greens have suffered heavy defeats in the state elections in Thuringia, Saxony and Brandenburg. As a consequence, the party leadership has now decided to resign. ‘New faces are needed to lead the party out of the crisis,’ says Ricarda Lang. She still added, ‘Now is not the time to stick to your own chair, now is the time to take responsibility’. Until the party conference in Wiesbaden in mid-November, Nouripour and she would continue to run the business. The decision had not been easy. ‘It was a great honour to serve this party.’ Source: die Welt

BSW co-chair advocates a new approach to the AfD

The co-chair of the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW), Amira Mohamed Ali, has once again ruled out a coalition between her party and the AfD. At the same time, however, she reiterated her call for a different approach to the AfD. The BSW has always clearly stated that a coalition with the AfD is out of the question because this party is, at least in part, right-wing extremist. ‘But we have also always said that we want a different approach to the AfD than the other parties have taken over the past ten years or so,’ added Ali. Source: Spiegel

No more German passports because of the slogan ‘From the River to the Sea’?

The Federal Ministry of the Interior (BMI) sees the slogan ‘From the River to the Sea’ as a possible reason for exclusion from acquiring the German citizenship. This emerges from the BMI’s ‘provisional application notes’ on the new Citizenship Act. The new law, which came into force on 27 June 2024, is intended to enable well-integrated people to naturalise more quickly – after five years instead of the previous eight. The slogan makes reference to the area between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, which includes Israel and the Palestinian territories. Source: islamiq

‘I feel betrayed by both countries’

David Macou was 19 years old when he came to the GDR as a contract labourer from Mozambique in 1979. The promise: vocational training and money with which he could build a future back in his country. However, what he and others on the same situation didn’t know was that they were just puppets in an intergovernmental horse-trading deal between the GDR and Mozambique. There was hardly any contact with the local population. They encountered prejudice everywhere. David felt cheated by both countries: by the GDR, which withheld his wages, and by Mozambique, which had barely passed the money from Germany on to the contract workers. Source: rbb

“Lebanese and Palestinian people will free themselves with the help of us outside”

Interview with Lebanese socialist Jean-Michael Yahiya

Thanks for talking to us. Could you briefly introduce yourself?

I’m Jean-Michael. I come from Lebanon where I grew up in with kind of a Westernized mindset. I went to a school where we learned the French Baccalaureate system in parallel with the Lebanese system. I came to Germany to get my masters in robotics.

Since the seventh of October, I had a radical switch in how I look at the world in general, but especially at Europe, in particular Germany, which I thought was a country of human rights.

It’s just about a year since 7th October, but in the last weeks, Israel has extended it’s war into Lebanon

I wouldn’t say I’m surprised that it has gone in this direction, because the State of Israel is based on Zionism, and Zionism is, by nature, expansionist. But it worries me more because it touches closer to home.

Lebanon was not constantly occupied in the way that Palestine is occupied and colonized. Divisions grew after the so-called independence from the French – they managed to divide us very well. So I worry about the Israeli attacks, but I also worry about the solidarity and unity of the people to resist and fight the aggression.

A couple of days ago I read an interview with Lebanese socialist Simon Assaf, who said that the attacks of Lebanon have united Lebanon in a way that hasn’t been possible in the last few decades

I could see this. I also look at the group of friends who grew up with. A lot of people understood the nature, the background, and the history of Hezbollah, even though we, as Lebanese people, have also lived through terrible experiences with Hezbollah – not because they’re “terrorists”, but because they’re a party in power just like the other parties.

For example, during the 2019 uprising, we were repressed and oppressed by all the parties. Hezbollah were maybe the most violent because they have the tools for that.

So, Hezbollah is not a socialist organisation and it played a terrible role in Syria. But they are now under attack from Israel. What attitude should socialists take towards Hezbollah?

We should be aware of the history of Hezbollah. It grew up as a movement from below, because the Shia community was very much isolated and oppressed during the Civil War. They were heavily affected when the Israelis invaded.

But as Hezbollah grew into a political party and integrated into the political class in Lebanon, its radical stances got diluted. They definitely played a terrible role in Syria that could not align with our values as internationalists.

But at the moment, they are the resistance, and as socialists, I think we should stand behind them, not because they are Hezbollah but because we should stand behind the resistance.

Some people, especially in Germany, are saying that Israel’s attack on Hezbollah and the killing of Nasrallah are legitimate because of their links with Iran.

There were always some exchanges of fire between Hezbollah and Israel whenever either the government in Israel or the party in Lebanon started to lose popularity, just to remind the people why they are there.

But you can’t carpetbomb the middle of a city just because Hezbollah exists there. I think the reaction of Hezbollah to the genocidal escalation on Gaza was legitimate as they did not attack Israel in its so called territories, but in the Sheba’a – the occupied Lebanese territories controlled by Israel. It is a totally valid approach to wake up resistance there.

It was very clear that Israel’s plan was to make the so-called buffer zones unliveable. They started by burning trees and using phosphorous bombs, to make the land uncultivable. People who make a living from the land by selling oil, olives, or soap now cannot live from it. They will be pushed away. I believe that the Zionists would then want to step in and colonize part of the Lebanese territories.

What’s everyday like life in Lebanon at the moment?

1 million people are already internally displaced. People from the South came to Beirut, thinking Beirut would be safe. But now the Israelis are sending messages to stay away from any property of Hezbollah without people knowing what that means.

They’ve been sending messages on Twitter at 3am where people are sleeping, saying that people should get out of their area. I’ve seen images of people on the streets and public places, with none of their belongings. The situation is quite ridiculous.

This is on top of the divisions I was talking about earlier. For example, refugees from Syria and Palestine are not receiving the same aid and support as the Lebanese people, because the organizations on the ground discriminate in favour of people from Lebanon.

All this is where Hezbollah is part of the government. Why are they seen as speaking for the resistance? Is the Lebanese Left not able to provide an alternative leadership?

In the Lebanese uprising, I don’t remember any concrete Left forming. People were very niched in support for the sectarian parties that came out of the Civil War. The result was groups of militias fighting against each other.

There’s no organised Left which is able to offer an alternative. But people are coming together, trying to help each other in every way they can, which is really nice. They are showing solidarity, and are hopefully getting more aware about the situation with Hezbollah.

At the same time, there’s the elitist mindset that still looks up to Europe. The people who emerged from the Fascist movement in the Civil War – the Phalanges – still have the same very racist mindset, thinking that Lebanon should be purely Lebanese. And they look to Europe for civilization.

But I think people are waking up and realizing that the heavy silence from the people in power and the media about Palestine is very similar when it comes to Lebanon. People who at first could not sympathize with the Palestinians are now realizing that it was not about Hamas.

During the Civil War, some Lebanese experienced attacks by the PLO, who have not always made the best decisions within the Lebanese community. But now they realize it’s not about the Palestinian people. It’s more about us as Arabs, as Lebanese and Palestinians and Syrians. We’re all put in the same box and our blood is not seen to matter as much as that of people of Europe and the US.

Why do you think Israel is attacking Lebanon? Don’t they have too much on their hands already with Gaza?

In Gaza, they have failed to reach any of their objectives. It was always clear that it was not about the hostages or even about 7th October. Those were excuses to carry out the genocide and to make Gaza unliveable.

We see a similar parallel in Lebanon, where they say it’s about Hezbollah. Now that they have taken down Nasrallah, they’re still striking very heavily at Beirut, but also at the Beqaa valley. We should not forget about the Beqaa, even though it’s spoken about less.

The attack on Lebanon is meant to distract, while Israel carries on with its genocidal campaign in Gaza, and escalates in the West Bank. It is an example both of Israel’s failures and also of its ongoing colonization of Palestine.

There’s a theory that Israel attacked Lebanon to try and bring the US more actively into the war.

Yeah. Israel has lost a lot of legitimacy with its allies, who are starting to realise that they cannot support them as much as they did in the beginning. So it’s in Israel’s advantage to go into a bigger war by escalating towards Lebanon, and maybe hoping that Iran gets involved. This could win them more support from the US and the European countries.

Israel is also not doing well economically. They need economic support from the US to keep the whole project living and to keep colonizing more and more of Palestine.

We have elections coming up in the US and Kamala Harris has made a turn. She’s now expressing sympathy for Palestinians at the same time as continuing to support sending weapons to Israel. What is Harris’s attitude towards Lebanon and Lebanese people?

They want a ceasefire to pacify the movement against Harris and the Democrats. But at the same time they’re sending more money. Similarly, they call for a ceasefire in Lebanon and say they don’t want any sort of escalation. But again, they’ve sent $8.7 billion in military aid to Israel.

They’re still doing the same thing that they did when there was the huge massacre in Dahieh. They dropped ten 2000 pound bombs, reducing six apartment buildings to ashes. This was reported live on television. The US said they were still assessing the situation, and were not aware of exactly what was happening. They said that they could not directly trust what was being reported. This is wild, but it’s also what they have been doing with Gaza and the West Bank from the start. They’re always assessing the situation.

Israel is carrying out a genocide in Gaza and is threatening another genocide in Lebanon. Can they be stopped?

I think the BDS movement and the world community should be, and could be, a big factor in strangling the economic flow of aid towards Israel. Israel always survived because of external economical and military aid. Not from within its colony as it cannot sustain itself without external backing.

Israel can be stopped if the settlers living there suffer economically, and they see that there is no alternative to keep going this way. Maybe there will be a civil war. Maybe not, I don’t know, but this is something very long term. It’s hard to imagine how things will turn out at this point, but I really hope for a total arms embargo, a total ceasefire, and justice for Palestine, justice for Lebanon.

I think that the Lebanese people and the Palestinian people will be able to free themselves and take care of the situation, with the support of us, the people outside.

You’re living in Freiburg in Germany, where we feel a long way away from a mass boycott campaign or an embargo. What is the next step for Palestine and Lebanon Solidarity in Germany?

We should never stop talking about Palestine and now Lebanon. Some German people have probably more sympathy towards the Lebanese people for, well, racist reasons.

In parallel, the Lebanese people are also realizing that what’s happening in Lebanon is very heavily tied to Palestine. They’re also starting to learn, so hopefully the movement will grow. The masks have dropped, and people are starting to realize what’s happening.

Here in Germany, there’s the spectre of fascists being on the rise, and people are realizing that it’s not a coincidence. Racism is allowed, normalized and tolerated in this society which is very apparent as it is being blatantly used right now against the Palestine Solidarity movement.

We’re trying our best to keep mobilizing, informing people, talking about the importance of BDS and also about the importance of talking about Palestine and the history of Palestine.

Are you optimistic or pessimistic at the moment?

I’m optimistic and hopeful, because I look at the resistance in Palestine, in Lebanon, and also worldwide. It’s not just armed resistance. We’re all contributing to resisting the violence of the colonial and imperial system.

It’s very painful to know what’s happening to our people back home, whether in Lebanon or Palestine. It is beyond words. I really hope for a total end to our suffering, not just by a ceasefire, but also by reaching justice for the people.

Is there anything else you’d like to say that we’re not covered?

Keep talking about Palestine. Keep talking about Lebanon. History is very important to look at and to learn from. And get organized to fight racism and the systems that allow such violence to happen.

THE BIG CHILL

One-Day Symposium

THE BIG CHILL, One-Day Symposium, Spore Initiative, Berlin-Neukölln, 5 October 2024, 11h00 – 18h00

At the invitation of Candice Breitz, symposium guests Michael Barenboim, Daniel Bax, Yasmeen Daher, Alexander Gorski, Pauline Jäckels, Nadezda Krasniqi, Jerzy Montag, Michael Rothberg, Nahed Samour and Charlotte Wiedemann will discuss the modes of silence and array of silencing mechanisms that constitute the chilling effect that has settled over German public discourse in the wake of the horrific atrocities of 7 October 2023 and the unspeakably grotesque and disproportionate violence that Palestinians have been subject to both leading up to and since that date.

Since 7 October, despite the International Court of Justice having ruled that it is plausible that Israel has committed acts that violate the Genocide Convention, much of German civil society has opted for silence in relation to the catastrophic death toll in the occupied Palestinian territories, a silence that to some extent betrays the fear of being branded antisemitic under the vague logic of German Staatsräson and/or the IHRA’s working definition of antisemitism. Parallel to this broad display of anticipatory obedience, Palestinians, progressive Jews and their allies have been muted, de-platformed, stigmatized (and at times even criminalized) with voracious frequency. A series of anti-democratic measures have been applied (or are currently being drafted) to the ends of curbing and censuring non-violent opinions that lie well within constitutional parameters yet run counter to the increasingly dogmatic discourse that has been perpetuated by Germany’s political class (and reproduced, with ominous consistency, across much of its press landscape).

Symposium participants will consider how perceived and/or actual restrictions on freedom of speech, freedom of political opinion, freedom of assembly and academic freedom have led to the normalisation of repressive attitudes and policies towards a range of racialised minorities that are too often cast as ‘other’ to white Germany—as well as towards intellectuals, artists, activists, journalists and students.

Silence can signify in a variety of ways. It can be imposed or self-chosen. It can be a consequence of social, ideological or legal coercion. It can betray deep apathy or cloak deep empathy. It can be a necessary tool of self-preservation. To what extent have silencing mechanisms and related discourses of exclusion gained support under the cover of political initiatives that promise to afford greater safety to Jewish life in Germany and beyond? To what extent have communities that are already deeply impacted by prejudice, become increasingly vulnerable as heated discourse pertaining to Israel-Palestine continues to polarize the public sphere? How can we collectively work towards the breaking of repressive silences?

The Big Chill’ is curated by Candice Breitz. The symposium is funded by the Hochschule für Bildende Künste Braunschweig, with immensely generous support from Spore Initiative.

Anti-Muslim racism as diversion from social crises

The currently pervasive racism against asylum seekers and Musilms is a simple diversion from the budget crisis and increasing capitalist competition.

After the incident in Solingen, in which four people lost their lives in a knife attack, the standard answer from the whole political landscape was tougher migration politics and rabble rousing against refugees and people seeking asylum. Solingen is being used above all to create an atmosphere of racist scapegoats – above all in the heated election period in Eastern Germany in September.

The extent to which this narrative will be repeated after Olaf Scholz’s statement “We have to deport more people and faster” remains to be seen. But since the knife attack, we have heard uninterrupted insinuations by politicians from all large parties that the most dangerous people using knives are all Islamists.

In the Bundestag, a Green politician said “the poison of Islam does not just reach the heads of people abroad – it also reaches people here”. Later she claimed that this was a slip of the tongue, and she meant to say “Islamism”. Nonetheless, this is what she said.

In the mainstream media and the state courts, it seems that the terms Islam and Islamism are being used as synonyms, as we can see in the coverage of the closure of the Blue Mosque in Hamburg and of a cultural centre in Frankfurt-Main.

Mass deportations as an answer to Solingen and Mannheim

The German government’s answer to individual acts of violence in Solingen and Mannheim serves to present German migration and asylum politics as both the cause of and the solution for individual violence. The “traffic light coalition” is carrying out a brutal shift to the right in its migration legislation.

Originally, they did this together with the CDU whose demands on migration are barely distinguishable from those of the essentially Fascist AfD. But now the CDU has withdrawn from talks on migration because they say that the proposals by the coalition parties are not severe enough.

CDU chairman Friedrich Merz posted “Es reicht” (enough), and is now demanding a complete suspension of the right to asylum for people fleeing Afghanistan and Syria. Meanwhile, Sahra Wagenknecht demanded the Chancellor should send a stop signal to the world – ‘the Willkommenskultur (culture of welcome) is over, we can’t manage it, don’t even start’.

In talks with the SPD which by-passed the government, Merz called for no more taboos, and said that everything must be considered. He would use the “national emergency” to carry out changes to the German constitution. Dual citizenship should be banned. This would make it practically impossible for many people to gain German citizenship, as some countries do not allow you to give up your original citizenship.

Racism hides the question of distribution

Above all the CDU is blaming the coalition’s current migration politics for the knife attacks. And yet shortly after the Solingen killings, a German woman carried out a similar knife attack in a bus in Siegen. The only reason that there were no deaths was because three Muslim women overpowered the attacker. There was no need here to call a national emergency.

Merz also claims that people seeking asylum are the only reason why the situation in and around nurseries, schools, universities, medical practises and the housing market is more catastrophic than ever before. It is clear that this is racist agitation and scapegoat propaganda by a politician who, as a former board member and lobbyist for Blackrock – the largest asset manager in the world – is not really interested in a society of solidarity.

It is not asylum seekers who make decisions about investments, wages, and public centre work contracts, but the state. It is not asylum seekers who decide how high rents are in cities, and how high the land prices are in the countryside, but a profit-seeking market of competing large companies and investment funds. It is not asylum seekers who overload hospitals, medical practices and the health system, but the government’s dismantling of critical infrastructure and comprehensive healthcare provision.

Budget crisis comes to a head

In 2022, Germany shifted €60 billion of unused credit from the Corona emergency fund into a new “climate and transformation fund”. Here the Bundestag, with the votes of the coalition parties, retrospectively passed a supplementary budget for the financial year 2021. The CDU/CSU voted against.

The Federal Constitutional Court ruled that this behaviour of the traffic light coalition had violated the constitution. They based their verdict in particular on the evasion of the so-called Schuldenbremse (debt brake).

The hole in the 2025 budget amounted to a figure in the tens of millions, and led to a redistribution from below to above. Instead of cutting social spending, the state guaranteed tax relief to the rich and big business.

The quarrel in the traffic light coalition about how the missing money can be raised ultimately hangs on the question of the extent to which the state can put the burden upon working people. There is no discussion about taxing the rich. Instead further repression against welfare recipients will be used to fill the hole in the budget.

Racism divides in the face of overwhelming conditions

The racism which is currently rampant is a clear strategy of diversion from the real causes of social worries and fears. It diverts the working class from the real cause of a lack of investment in the social sector. The political parties are counting on racism, and hounding marginalised and vulnerable people to drive a wedge between working people. They want to divide parts of the public who produce all social and private wealth – wealth which is not produced by Friedrich Merz, Olaf Scholz or the Nazi Björn Höcke.

The increasing impoverishment of broad parts of society is leading to enormous fears of social decline. The dismantling of the social sector is increasing the gap between poor and rich even further. The latest so-called “Mitte-Studie” (study of the middle class) calls this phenomenon “Marktförmigkeit” (market-formedness), and says that this is “released” by the massive insecurity in “times of crisis”. According to this study, it is exactly these insecure “market-formed people” who are open to right wing propaganda.

For Marxists this is nothing new, and we won’t get tired of insisting that the political and material relationships in which people find themselves form their consciousness about the political system. Racist slogans, a Fascist leadership cult, and even extermination fantasies take effect as a drastic alternative in the light of the inability of all mainstream and left parties to handle the crises of the capitalist economy. The absence of a socialist opposition to the capitalist and parliamentary system combined with scaremongering and division paves the way to a further shift to the right.

Capitalism cannot be social

The planned cuts in social spending lead to a critical and life-threatening situation for large parts of the population. The rising cost of living is rising while people’s consumption is being transported directly into the pockets of rich bosses and shareholders.

The current racist insinuations against asylum seekers, our neighbours and colleagues, as promoted by Blackrock lobbyists like Friedrich Merz are not based in fact. It is not true that lower social spending will be solved by the full removal of the right of asylum, nor that the money “released” will flow into necessary public sector structures and dilapidated infrastructure. Neither will it result in the expropriation of housing companies like Deutsche Wohnen, the nationalisation of energy companies and the consequent dependence on the market.

Racism in general, and anti-Muslim racism in particular are in the sharpest sword used in the 21st century by capitalists and their mainstream politicians to divide the working class and weaken their organisations.

The racism of the mainstream parties only serves to further intensify the crisis of the capitalist economic system. The livelihood of the middle class and small entrepreneurs, in the form of young apprentices, is increasingly deported and taken away, Through increased competition, the existential fears of many more will grow, and Fascism will seem an attractive answer for many of these isolated middle classes as a way of apparently overcoming the crises.

Anti-racist workers’ struggles more necessary than ever

Workers’ struggles which have already been announced at Volkswagen, in the 2025 public sector bargaining round, at nurseries, schools, Universities and Deutsche Bahn must be carried out in a consistent anti-racist manner.

Growing and expanding social movements were always a point of attraction for working people. It is our task as anti-racists and as socialists to provide answers to the crises and their causes. We must consistently oppose wars, weapon delivery and rearmament. We must consistently oppose anti-Muslim racism and antisemitism. We must build broad alliances to confront the far right and to reduce – then fully prevent – their influence on society.

All this combined with a radical criticism of capitalism can cut the ground from beneath the far right – ground which for weeks the mainstream parties have been making fruitful for Fascist organisations. The racist basis for incipient Fascism is currently being channeled into wider society. .This basis can still be opposed and its foundation can be destroyed. To do this, our anti-racism and our solidarity in the fight against oppression and underpayment must be indivisible.

This article first appeared in German on the Sozialismus von Unten website. Translation: Phil Butland. Reproduced with permission.